And curiously ps5 pro has the same drops even with more bandwith/gpu memory, look at the coincidence. They just haven't take in the count the alternate usage of the cpu/gpu with variable frequency of the ps5 hardware, seems straight to the face to me.
That only works if the other versions didn't use VRS, which they do.
They said ps5 pro has the same occasional fps drops of ps5 base if my memory not tricked me...and surely it's not "regular" the series X hardware has the fps performance advantage over the ps5 pro.
The system clearly feels like a scam at this point.
Series X system felt like a scam because ps5 base can beat it sometimes with less hardware grunt?
Bullshit?? Guess the typical excuse of some egos to deny pure logic and something that has always been assumed as a fact that the platform with the largest user base is generally the one that Studios give priority in optimitation and even designing a game.
You know right the base of development it's the pc platform than ported to the series X and ps5 in their respectively different tools kit. They don't start with the ps5 code to port to the series X tools, what hell of stupidity is that.
Same. I waited a year to play that game on PS5, with the new features. I think I put about 90 minutes into it before uninstalling and selling my copy.
It uses some kind of software VRS on PS5 too. They really shouldn't use any VRS as the game appear super soft on all platforms IMO.Nah, the feature works. VRS is applied on certain elements only.
Despite it, the overall screen clarity is notably sharper on Xbox.
And it helps retain performance, the PS5 is running ~10 fps behind Series X in the same combat areas.
The blurry TAA makes it hard for me to see the PS5, XSX, and even the PS5 Pro clearly.Despite it, the overall screen clarity is notably sharper on Xbox.
If most of drops happen during the combat it's extremely unlikely it was the gpu the cause.
I don't know how works VRS hardware but if it's tied to the TOPS job should work extremely well and with a lot less artifacts on ps5 pro to give even more benefits.
No, that's not the case...
Strategies like this are more a thing of tiny studios. The largest one have completely different team and environment for the different consoles. And also the series X had the biggest advantage to share the development enviroment with the pc, so, paradoxically, someone could prefer to start to work with series X and "porting" just later to the ps5.
I guarantee to you it can't happen considered the limited specs of the switch 2. There is nothing of magic in the DLSS algorithms and with less hardware resources can't surely beat another upscaler based to the same logic but with just a different branded name. DLSS it's neither that superior as some people tend to believe. Said that, considered the size of the screen, switch 2 will be more than fine with such custom DLSS.
Hardware RDNA2 VRS is a bad technology. All PC gamers who tested both always remove it for a good reason. The trade-offs are not worth it. I read some say 7% better performance with PS1-like textures.
Yep. More often than not on the One X specifically, you would see third party games perform a little worse than PS4 Pro, due to the developers of said game using the extra horsepower to push for higher resolutions. Very rarely would we see games actually receive improved settings on the console, and increased frame rate was hit or miss, due to the One X having the same overall CPU as the base Xbox One. RDR2 and a handful of other games showcased what the system was capable of, but those examples weren't the norm. Doesn't mean it was a bad console though.
Its use in XSX has been shown on different occasions to be magnificent and worth it....VRS hardware in XSeries surely has special optimization vs PC. That there are situations where its implementation has not been the best makes the same sense as when PSSR is implemented horribly, and that doesn't mean you say it's 'not worth it.'
I would say that it's a valid complaint no matter what's happening most of the time.
The thing is that MS is doing good everywhere here and some simply want to make it seem like it isn't. There are countless cases of multiplatform games from studios and third-party publishers with the same or even worse results.... In the end, it gives the impression that, for some, 'doing well' means putting XSX in the background and prioritizing PS5....
They aren't even doing well on their own console, there's settings that don't even work. And Series S version looks terrible. This was rushed on everything.
Have you watched the video?
I think the bang for the buck is pretty poor compared to eternal. Yeah it looks bit better but eternal runs much fasterBetween Indy and now Doom, IDTech has taken the lead as arguably the most performative engine in the market.
Solid 60fps with RTGI on console hardware when so many games struggle to hit a consistent performance without those features.
Wonder if there's still time to shift the inevitable Halo Remake or Fallout 5 over to IDTech.
That was my takeaway. I'm going to wait for some patches on this one.
Like how they got GTA V running on the 360
That's the real takeaway. It won't get any better as these industry people can go online and find hordes of gamers talking gleefully about PSSR and DLSS. If the reception of these slop scalers wasn't so good, there would be more pressure to just not use them. At this point is anyone even expecting PS6 and XB5 to run at native res and refresh? Just going off the top of my head, were Gamecube and Dreamcast the most recent consoles to actually hit that target?
The flaws you mention are trivialities, certainly nothing that undermines the experience. On the other hand, you have a technologically very complete game running at a perfect or almost perfect 60 fps on all platforms. Much more than what 98% of multiplatform games can say at their launch. And that doesn't take into account that it hasn't been released yet and that a day one or upcoming patch will likely resolve those small details.
Maybe that's a question for you
PS5 is performing light-years better than XSS. Some lower fps at moments of high demand means nothing when the game runs at much higher resolutions, better RTGI, many more effects, texture quality, shadows, etc., etc...
Agreed about TAA. Still doesn't excuse gamers at large for joyously accepting these 'solutions' with expectant mouths. Trying to play Forza Motorsport last night and despite disabling anything that might be construed as a slop scaler, it's still there in the gameplay. Tough times for people looking for a crisp, well resolved image.
No it's definitely a question for you. They literally say that Series X is king. And it's DOOM. The thing you'll notice the most is framerate drops.
I don't see how, exactly, not when a 3070 is hitting 60fps at 1440p, Ultra Nightmare, and a 4070 is managing the same but without any upscaling. A Series X using 5 year old hardware in an APU with limited wattage, is managing TDA at 60 fps locked with RTGI, whilst a PS5 Pro is outputting the game at a higher resolution, and is only dropping frames occasionally.
The resolution is considerably higher on Pro. A VRR display will make the… Two instances of 55 fps drops pretty much nonexistent.
