I do however anticipate that the long term future of technology will be based on cloud usage (global rather than local for everything) whether some want to believe it of not so who knows.
could Someone explain the term 'stawman' in the most simple way I have a hard time understanding the wiki definition.
This is kind of irrelevant if most games are created on XO and then ported to PS4.
Are you trying to redefine Math here? The PS4 has 50% more raw GPU processing power compared to the Xbone, not 33%.
You're quoting a product name (Gaikai is all you need to counter your answer), and mention a part/chip of the system that is not related to the "cloud" in any meaningful way. "Cloud computing" won't be used to enhance game processing anyway, as that would mean persistent significant cost in providing processing power for games - for marginal possible benefit. That's just economically unsound.
This is kind of irrelevant if most games are created on XO and then ported to PS4.
Considering how closely the hardware is related to each other and PC, it's more likely games will be developed on PC, then ported to PS4/XBO.
The platform that gets off to the biggest head start, if that happens of course, will be the defacto lead platform.
Money talks.
Xbox always wins baby.
Digital Foundry is soooooo pro microsoft/xbox they say: xbone gpu 33% less powerfull instead of Playstation 4 GPU 150%!! the power of xbox gpu!! .....
Or even say " PS4 gpu 50% more powerfull then xbone gpu" . no, theyre experts at downplaying just like they did all those years with head2heads.
F%*k them and most american/pro xbox media.
Playstation will prevail!! No matter what you do
Oh man. Please tell me this a joke. I believe digital foundry is based in the UK by the way.Digital Foundry is soooooo pro microsoft/xbox they say: xbone gpu 33% less powerfull instead of Playstation 4 GPU 150%!! the power of xbox gpu!! .....
Or even say " PS4 gpu 50% more powerfull then xbone gpu" . no, theyre experts at downplaying just like they did all those years with head2heads.
F%*k them and most american/pro xbox media.
Playstation will prevail!! No matter what you do
Digital Foundry is soooooo pro microsoft/xbox they say: xbone gpu 33% less powerfull instead of Playstation 4 GPU 150%!! the power of xbox gpu!! .....
Or even say " PS4 gpu 50% more powerfull then xbone gpu" . no, theyre experts at downplaying just like they did all those years with head2heads.
F%*k them and most american/pro xbox media.
Playstation will prevail!! No matter what you do
Digital Foundry is soooooo pro microsoft/xbox they say: xbone gpu 33% less powerfull instead of Playstation 4 GPU 150%!! the power of xbox gpu!! .....
Or even say " PS4 gpu 50% more powerfull then xbone gpu" . no, theyre experts at downplaying just like they did all those years with head2heads.
F%*k them and most american/pro xbox media.
Playstation will prevail!! No matter what you do
They won something, definitely. I'm just not sure it's something they wanted to win.Wins what?
Digital Foundry is soooooo pro microsoft/xbox they say: xbone gpu 33% less powerfull instead of Playstation 4 GPU 150%!! the power of xbox gpu!! .....
Or even say " PS4 gpu 50% more powerfull then xbone gpu" . no, theyre experts at downplaying just like they did all those years with head2heads.
F%*k them and most american/pro xbox media.
Playstation will prevail!! No matter what you do
Digital Foundry is soooooo pro microsoft/xbox they say: xbone gpu 33% less powerfull instead of Playstation 4 GPU 150%!! the power of xbox gpu!! .....
Or even say " PS4 gpu 50% more powerfull then xbone gpu" . no, theyre experts at downplaying just like they did all those years with head2heads.
F%*k them and most american/pro xbox media.
Playstation will prevail!! No matter what you do
Digital Foundry is soooooo pro microsoft/xbox they say: xbone gpu 33% less powerfull instead of Playstation 4 GPU 150%!! the power of xbox gpu!! .....
Or even say " PS4 gpu 50% more powerfull then xbone gpu" . no, theyre experts at downplaying just like they did all those years with head2heads.
F%*k them and most american/pro xbox media.
Playstation will prevail!! No matter what you do
There's a 600gf difference between PS4 and Xbone. You need to add another >.
Also this comparison just highlighted that the Xbone is exactly the middle ground between a WiiU and PS4 in GPU performance. Wonder how many games will be sub-full-hd on the platform.
Digital Foundry is soooooo pro microsoft/xbox they say: xbone gpu 33% less powerfull instead of Playstation 4 GPU 150%!! the power of xbox gpu!! .....
Or even say " PS4 gpu 50% more powerfull then xbone gpu" . no, theyre experts at downplaying just like they did all those years with head2heads.
F%*k them and most american/pro xbox media.
Playstation will prevail!! No matter what you do
I think.... I MIGHT have an idea WHY he SAYS he thinks xbone is phenomenal..... I just MIGHT...
The day m$ steps out the console business...... I will be a happy MAN. !!!
Once divorced, never coming back to you microsoft haha. .. Gonna marry Sony. Bye
I bet Digital Foundry is going out of business within a year or so.... Reaaaaly quitlyyy...
One and only correct answer.
We all know ea wants ms to win the consolewar
both illuminati. Its just that they need the money/marketshare otherwise when they would have the chance, they would stop supporting Nintendo and Sony all togeher.
Don't do this to yourself. Please! There is still time!
Below is a serious post;Well obviously this is just for the first year! Year two and beyond expect Avatar quality graphics for Xbox, and Toy Story 1 graphics for lolstation 4.
oooohh...augmented cloud computing:
http://ca.ign.com/articles/2013/05/21/xbox-one-to-become-more-powerful-over-time-via-cloud-computing
As internet access/bandwidth gets better they can offload more computing into the cloud increasing the power of the Xbox One.
This could potentially leave the PS4 in its dust. AFAIK the PS4 is one or the other....local or cloud.
My PC has 1000% more power than PS4 and Xbox One
Start with 1.8tflops, calculate the difference between that high end number and 1.2tflops, tell me what number you arrive at. If you're being honest about it, it's 33%
Gaikai can not match Microsoft's azure. Are you insane?
It's like a repeat of "those leaked specs aren't real!" all over again.
They aren't real soddamnit! They're over 2yrs old. Just you wait and see. Why do you think ms glossed over the specs during the reveal. They obviously have enough money and power that upgrades are still in progress
please...
only giving a voice to their plans among the screams of stone throwers. Asking for an opportunity for the plan to unfold before calling it irrelevant, or idiotic
nothing more, no grand savior ...
I do however anticipate that the long term future of technology will be based on cloud usage (global rather than local for everything) whether some want to believe it of not so who knows.
Come E3, we'll get the true ONE - with Dual-APUs.They aren't real soddamnit! They're over 2yrs old. Just you wait and see. Why do you think ms glossed over the specs during the reveal. They obviously have enough money and power that upgrades are still in progress
I'm going to summarize what I know with regards to Xbox 3.
VGLeaks info has been accurate due to what the info is coming from.
- Always online/internet connection required
- No used games
- No BC
- CPU has increased performance over normal Jaguar cores.
- ~3GB and 2 CPU cores are reserved for the OS, apps, Kinect, etc.
- Xbox has a crazy (IMO) amount of hardware dedicated to audio tasks (e.g. gaming and Siri capabilities)
- Kinect is a pack in
- Same day digital releases for all games
If I learn anything new before I leave the boards, I'll pass it along.
For me I'm not going to write off Sony's audio direction at this point. With the change to Jaguar cores, they will need something competent in that area.
Come E3, we'll get the true ONE - with Dual-APUs.
Not sure where to put this but speaking of specs it reminded me that bgassasin pretty much had most of the details correct.
Oh man, how did I forget that one. Enough money to stop time. Power of the cloud.They aren't real soddamnit! They're over 2yrs old. Just you wait and see. Why do you think ms glossed over the specs during the reveal. They obviously have enough money and power that upgrades are still in progress
Not sure where to put this but speaking of specs it reminded me that bgassasin pretty much had most of the details correct.
I'm going to summarize what I know with regards to Xbox 3.
VGLeaks info has been accurate due to what the info is coming from.
- Always online/internet connection required
- No used games
- No BC
- CPU has increased performance over normal Jaguar cores.
- ~3GB and 2 CPU cores are reserved for the OS, apps, Kinect, etc.
- Xbox has a crazy (IMO) amount of hardware dedicated to audio tasks (e.g. gaming and Siri capabilities)
- Kinect is a pack in
- Same day digital releases for all games
If I learn anything new before I leave the boards, I'll pass it along.
For me I'm not going to write off Sony's audio direction at this point. With the change to Jaguar cores, they will need something competent in that area.
Percentages, how do they work.
A being 33% less than B is the same as B being 50% more than A.
This has been pointed out to you numerous times, but despite this basic mathematics lesson, you seem intent to remain deliberately obtuse.
Percentages, how do they work.Start with 1.8tflops, calculate the difference between that high end number and 1.2tflops, tell me what number you arrive at. If you're being honest about it, it's 33%
Gaikai can not match Microsoft's azure. Are you insane?
Full View of the Cloud
Everyone just sort of nods along when cloud gaming is brought up. It's not an especially captivating idea. (The only reason anyone really perked up over it with the PS4 was because of backward compatibility.) Video games are most easily understood in concrete examples, and the real work in conceptualizing how to use this tech hasn't really been done yet. But man this is cool.
Essentially, Microsoft has made the Xbox modular. The background tasks that will be offloaded to the cloud will be a serious deal in a large number of cases. You know how in Skyrim sometimes you can look at a specific part of a specific wall and your framerate will randomly dip down into the afterlife? That workload (which is probably a silly mistake, but still) would probably be shifted off to some Microsoft server, and never make it to your Xbox. The decision-making process of when to do thatit only fires on "latency insensitive" loads, not "latency sensitive" onesstill dictates that the majority of workload will still be done locally, client side (i.e. on your Xbox). But that's not always going to be the case.
What's in the box, the hard specs, was determined by the experience team to be a big enough step forward to be a next gen console, and being that the PS4's specs are basically identical, it seems basically right. It's the step you'd take if you were just doing what you'd always done. But the ways that hardware, alongside the cloud computing, will be used have the ability to expand drastically.
The 300,000 Xbox Live servers Microsoft is bringing online this year will be a constant developers can rally around, knowing that the vast majority of users will be connected, so you can try out new ideas knowing that they'll be usable by almost everyone. (The same goes for the Kinect being included with every One.)
Every time I randomly click on this thread I see people arguing about the percentages lol. Learn math you fucks.