Discuss: The new 3DS and the emergent "split userbase"... is this a good trend?

I don't know, but i'm sure that's a HORRIBLE naming strategy.
I thought the whole Wii U thing had taught them a few thing, but apparently they still have one or two things to learn.
Sooooo confusing.

This is the biggest problem with the console.

Another WiiU name.

When you say "hey man did you see that new 3ds", it doesnt sound like its a revision. 2ds was a stupid name and all, but new 3ds is right up there with the WiiU. It probably wont be nearly as confusing for people, but its still a bad decision.
 
I don't think it is a good trend for gaming consoles personally. It fragments and more importantly confuses the user base. I think it fits handhelds better though, because you don't have to worry as much about multiplatform development and online communities.

That said I wouldn't put it pass MS, who seems willing to do anything, to release an "New" Xbone a year or two from now.
 
Wikipedia dates might not be accurate, but I have no other base.

Game Boy: April 21, 1989
Game Boy Color: October 21, 1998
Game Boy Advance: March 21, 2001


.....okay I feel stupid for bringing the Game Boy Color comparison. Did anyone see Nintendo planning to release 3DS's successor in 2018?
 
This is the biggest problem with the console.

Another WiiU name.

When you say "hey man did you see that new 3ds", it doesnt sound like its a revision. 2ds was a stupid name and all, but new 3ds is right up there with the WiiU. It probably wont be nearly as confusing for people, but its still a bad decision.

Hey man did you see that new Gameboy called the Gameboy Color?

What about the new DS.. the DS Lite?

The shit doesn't change. Why are people assuming that Nintendo has ever been any different?

NES... SNES.. Go Bingo.
 
A few exclusives here and there is not a big deal. I'm surprised it's controversial. There is no doubt that all of the forthcoming consequential games are still going to the entire range of the 3DS platform.

All of the usability improvements are far more important and everyone should welcome them. I'm especially interested in the 3D viewing angles. It's such a great feature that I usually pass on because it's badly implemented. I hope the eye tracking is reliable.
 
I guess I don't undertsand it.

Why not just focus on a new, much better handheld instead?
 
I'm not happy about it, the 3DS is 3yr 6mths old & this is basically a new system, i'm not going to be replacing my original day one 3DS, i bet the WiiU will be next :/
 
Hey man did you see that new Gameboy called the Gameboy Color?

What about the new DS.. the DS Lite?

The shit doesn't change. Why are people assuming that Nintendo has ever been any different?

NES... SNES.. Go Bingo.

"Super" Nintendo Entertainment System to me sounds like it would be something new and more powerful.

DSLite - indicates that its a slimmer version

to where as

WiiU - tells me.. its a wii.. but its for u? wait.. is it for me? i made this? i made this.

New Nintendo 3ds - ???????
 
If hemorrhaging money is alive, I don't want to know what you think dead is

The old Nintendo is bleeding money logic. If only we could say the same thing about Sony.

"Super" Nintendo Entertainment System to me sounds like it would be something new and more powerful.

DSLite - indicates that its a slimmer version

to where as

WiiU - tells me.. its a wii.. but its for u? wait.. is it for me? i made this? i made this.

New Nintendo 3ds - ???????

Because it's a perception of marketing, nothing more. The same thing that people assumed Xbox 360 was okay because having "Xbox 2" against Playstation 3 was going to make Microsoft look weak.
 
I totally understand the feeling of the millions who feel left in the dust for this

lol. what dust?
xenoblade? the wii game that nobody bought to begin with, is now all of a sudden going to fracture the handheld user base and cause a significant amount of people who can't afford the new hardware model (and coincidentally didn't even buy the wii game) to all of a sudden have a strong urge to play a jrpg they were never interested in, & miss out on a game they probably won't ever know existed?

this system isn't even a half step. it's not technically enough of a technological improvement to be a half step.

that's like calling the 4mb expansion pack a 'half step' between n64 tech and gcn tech.
just to be clear (because for some reason i feel like i need to), it wasn't.
it was a simple hardware 'touch-up'. it did not fracture the n64 user base (LOL).
the n64 fan base didn't cry in horror when they realised they couldn't play majors mask or donkey kong 64 without the expansion pack. or that rogue squadron looked so much nicer with it.

i'm going off on a tangent now but...
it was a different generation then. gamers in those days inherently understood the concept that if you wanted a specific piece of software, you needed to buy the hardware required to play it. that these companies don't "owe you" anything. and because of this, i feel like gamers were actually smarter & more reasonable as a result.

a concept that seems to be lost on modern day gamers today who cry like babies when a game isn't available to play on the hardware the've already bought. "waaah bayonetta", "waaa tomb raider" "waaa first party funded console game" (because you know there are gamers who are this stupid)…..

and today, here, people are trying very very hard to make it seem like this new hardware is a "DS2" (or 3) or something.
it's a fucking current hardware touch up.

all of this. it's all a symptom of the massive 'self-entitlement' of todays gamers, and todays youth in general. also i'm getting too old for this.

I guess I don't undertsand it.

Why not just focus on a new, much better handheld instead?

because it's not a new, better handheld.
it's a touch-up of a current existing handheld. that's the point.

i seriously don't understand how this is such a difficult concept to understand.
no offense.
 
I'd say they're treating them pretty similarly.

But why talk to a brick wall
Well on one hand you have Smash Bros, Pokémon, Codename STEAM and Xenoblade. And on the other you have... what again?

The brick wall would be Sony's Vita support I guess?
 
This was probably mentioned already, but until I can transfer my digital copy of games across different 3DS systems then this is just a total dick move. I bought the FE:A 3DS bundle... if I can't keep FE:A if I buy a new system, whats the point of the bundle to begin with?
 
I don't know, but i'm sure that's a HORRIBLE naming strategy.
I thought the whole Wii U thing had taught them a few thing, but apparently they still have one or two things to learn.
Sooooo confusing.

Say it with me now "This is the Japanese name."

Consumers won't get "New" and "新し" mixed up.
 
I see this as Nintendo trying to extend the shelf life of the 3DS hardware by using more or less the same cheap components with incremental improvements aimed primarily at allowing for easier porting of GameCube and Wii generation titles that will be used to flood the 2015 and beyond market. They're trying to hold off committing to a true successor by fluffing up the 3DS with a revision. As the system somewhat flounders in the West I do not think this revision will make a significant dent in the market: the changes are welcome but long overdue, and do little to nothing to alleviate majority of the concerns/observations as to why dedicated portable gaming hardware has stumbled in modern times due to the advent of mobile gaming. I feel the appeal of the 3DS LL is maybe too heavily reliant on what the 3DS XL and 2DS already had: a combination of those aware of yet hesitant to buy finally doing so, and early adopters looking to upgrade. Neither of these markets are particularly big and so, again, these seems like an effort to desperately extend the core 3DS shelf life instead of really hit the market hard with something new and appealing.

My concerns are as followed:
- Reliance on ports over new, exclusive software. I maintain the hardware upgrade will lead to a ton of GCN/Wii ports, and while that interests me somewhat I would like to see new stuff.
- Long term software support. Nintendo is historically fucking atrocious at committing long term to any device or peripheral that fragments their market. It's nice to talk shit about a better CPU and exclusive software, but proof is in the quantity. I would not be in the least bit surprised to see this release, get a bunch of ports, then die shortly after.
- Shitful marketing. 3DS LL sold alongside 2DS and 3DS XL and 3DS? Recipe for disaster.

I'm going to hock off my XL (which is one week old, fuck) soon and intend to get one of these whenever they hit Australia. But yeah. Not a move I'm confident in at all.

Just to clarify: "3DS LL" is the Japanese name for the 3DS XL, the new 3DS revisions are called "New 3DS" and "New 3DS LL" (and probably "New 3DS XL" when they introduce it to the Western market where "LL" is branded "XL".
 
It was increased CPU power and RAM just like the DSi and I presume New 3DS (they only said CPU...). So how is the GBC a new gen but DSi, not?

The GBC came out a long time after the original GB.

Currently one single game, which is a port of a 4 year old Wii game. There won't be many exclusive games.

In general you won't be able to play new games if you don't own new hardware. E.g. you can't play PS4 games, when you only own a PS3. But considering this is only a very minor upgrade and of course not the same as a new generation, so you won't miss out on a lot.

Except, if this thing takes off like they're hoping it will (Why else make a much beloved game like Xenoblade exclusive), there will be a ton of exclusives.

It doesn't personally affect me, as I had planned on buying an XL for MH4U, so now I'll just get a "New" XL, but this is still a really shitty thing to do.
 
This was probably mentioned already, but until I can transfer my digital copy of games across different 3DS systems then this is just a total dick move. I bought the FE:A 3DS bundle... if I can't keep FE:A if I buy a new system, whats the point of the bundle to begin with?

That'll teach you to buy bundles! But honestly I'm curious about this since I bought a 3DS XL with Mario Kart 7 pre-installed. I would hope that a system transfer, which included my Nintendo eShop data, would allow me to "transfer" the purchase of Mario Kart 7 over to any new 3DS system I owned.

At least that's what the new Nintendo id system seemed to imply.
 
I'm not a fan of this decision. I already traded in my 3DS once to upgrade to the 3DS XL, and now I have to trade THAT one in as well if I want to play games like Xenoblade on it (which I really want to).

Well technically I'm not obliged to do anything of course, but it still kind of sucks. I also think it shows Nintendo isn't really sure on what to do anymore with their hardware, seeing as there's also a 2DS and all...
 
I don't think userbase will be split in west, this whole "new 3DS exclusive" thing will be a Japan only. 3DS is dying in west as literally not a single big western developer is making a game right now. Everybody is waiting for a graphically monster next handheld.

My guess is Nintendo will delay next gen handheld and release more "new 3DS" games in Japan while next handheld will arrive in west way earlier than Japan. Like, Holiday 2015.
 
I see this as Nintendo trying to extend the shelf life of the 3DS hardware by using more or less the same cheap components with incremental improvements aimed primarily at allowing for easier porting of GameCube and Wii generation titles that will be used to flood the 2015 and beyond market. They're trying to hold off committing to a true successor by fluffing up the 3DS with a revision. As the system somewhat flounders in the West I do not think this revision will make a significant dent in the market: the changes are welcome but long overdue, and do little to nothing to alleviate majority of the concerns/observations as to why dedicated portable gaming hardware has stumbled in modern times due to the advent of mobile gaming. I feel the appeal of the 3DS LL is maybe too heavily reliant on what the 3DS XL and 2DS already had: a combination of those aware of yet hesitant to buy finally doing so, and early adopters looking to upgrade. Neither of these markets are particularly big and so, again, these seems like an effort to desperately extend the core 3DS shelf life instead of really hit the market hard with something new and appealing.

this is EXACTLY what this new hardware is.
it's not necessarily bad. it's not necessarily good.
for people who always wanted custom cases, its friggin great.

why is this soooo difficult for sooooo many to understand?
have they stop teaching critical thinking in school?
why is mob mentality so prevalent?
 
because it's not a new, better handheld.
it's a touch-up of a current existing handheld. that's the point.

i seriously don't understand how this is such a difficult concept to understand.
no offense.

And I don't understand why it is so difficult to understand that making this system (and the subsequent games required) takes manpower and resources away from development of a new system.
 
Oh the lets ignore how bad my favorite company is doing by looking at something else logic

Oh please. I don't give a shit who does what numbers on the console or handheld sphere. I've been on this forum way too long to combat this petty battle. The fact remains that Sony seem to lose more money than Nintendo consistently ever since they entered the entertainment industry concentrated in videogame sales. Armchair critics will decry the fact that Sony are hampered by the ballooning effects of their other company arms that subtract the overall performance of the Playstation brand and its money-making impetus, but at the end of the day no one can deny that Nintendo rarely go by a year on year basis where losing money is a normal occurrence.

I own both a Vita and 3DS. Sure I don't own a PS4, but I'm not a sucker - if the games that INTEREST SOLELY MYSELF hit, then sure I'll buy one.

And if there was ever a favourite company then they are long dead to the cold winds of the 1980s my friend.

And I don't understand why it is so difficult to understand that making this system (and the subsequent games required) takes manpower and resources away from development of a new system.

It's nothing more than bandaid to patch the gap between their new "bridged" hardware ;)
 
I'd be mad because I just got my XL, but I still have a ton of games left to play on it. Still, I waited this long because I knew they'd keep putting out revisions. Looks like I didn't wait long enough.

Also, Nintendo's use of "New" as part of official names continues to baffle me. Anyone up for some New Super Mario Bros? Y'know, that game from 2006?
 
In general is nothing new across game handhelds (GB>GBC, DS>DSI) and much across across (the yearly) iOS and Android devices. What it could mean for Nintendo now is another thing, as the 3DS is not as huge of a seller as their previews handhelds. So, they're betting on this and Amiibo to help them improve sales more.
 
Oh please. I don't give a shit who does what numbers on the console or handheld sphere. I've been on this forum way too long to combat this petty battle. The fact remains that Sony seem to lose more money than Nintendo consistently ever since they entered the entertainment industry concentrated in videogame sales. Armchair critics will decry the fact that Sony are hampered by the ballooning effects of their other company arms that subtract the overall performance of the Playstation brand and its money-making impetus, but at the end of the day no one can deny that Nintendo rarely go by a year on year basis where losing money is a normal occurrence.

I own both a Vita and 3DS. Sure I don't own a PS4, but I'm not a sucker - if the games that INTEREST SOLELY MYSELF hit, then sure I'll buy one.

And if there was ever a favourite company then they are long dead to the cold winds of the 1980s my friend.



It's nothing more than bandaid to patch the gap between their new "bridged" hardware ;)

your the one that keeps bringing up sony. sony sucks. whatever.

my only comment was that this move continues to show nintendo is out of touch and doesn't know how to combat their increasing irrelevance.
 
It's been years since the 3DS released. None of you would be complaining if Nintendo had went and announced a 4DS in which NONE of the games for it could be played on previous devices. Do you get mad that your Wii can't play Wii U games too?
 
I'd be mad because I just got my XL, but I still have a ton of games left to play on it. Still, I waited this long because I knew they'd keep putting out revisions. Looks like I didn't wait long enough.

Also, Nintendo's use of "New" as part of official names continues to baffle me. Anyone up for some New Super Mario Bros? Y'know, that game from 2006?

Anecdotal, I know, but a friend of mine from the States got hooked big time co-op on the NSMB game on Wii, and then on the Wii U. This directly led to the fact that they all finished the game and needed new Mario - low and behold what's this shit called Super Mario 3D World that included co-op?

I told her she and her husband & co. fell for the gimmick. Most of them never play games too hardcore compared to the resident GAF crowd, but it gave me time to pause and think.
 
sörine;127601087 said:
Well on one hand you have Smash Bros, Pokémon, Codename STEAM and Xenoblade. And on the other you have... what again?

Xenoblade looking about as bad as the GoW collection. Nintendo coping sony again
 
Hmm I might buy a 3DS if it improves lag in older games enough.

Glad Nintendo finally improved the hardware, shame about the massive slap in the face to the fans who will basically have to buy this to enjoy the more demanding games.
 
your the one that keeps bringing up sony. sony sucks. whatever.

my only comment was that this move continues to show nintendo is out of touch and doesn't know how to combat their increasing irrelevance.

Sony are based in Japan, as much as Nintendo are. Your original comment showcased how out of touch Nintendo seem to be. What better example to provide than a budding competitor in the same market from the same country & culture?

Of course one could easily counter my argument by stating how successful the PS4 hardware is doing in both North American and European markets..
 
Good trend? No. But I expect it to be a pretty minor variation until proven otherwise. If a majority of first/third party games start being New 3DS only I'll start to agree it's a big problem instead of a small, but stupid one, but for now it seems like a poor idea but not one that's going to be extremely annoying for fans or damaging for Nintendo.

sörine;127603799 said:
Fortunately they didn't copy them when it came to memory cards.

So, what's Sony's coming new Vita games lineup look like again?

Um, fantastic?
 
The exclusive games for the new 3ds will be games that anyhow wouldn't have been on the "old" 3ds because of the CPU limitation, so I don't get the complains. No one steals no one's games. It like the Bayo 2 discussion, but for different reasons. There wouldn't have been a Xenoblade 3ds without the new 3ds. In addition if this revision sells it will only prolongue the life and the support of the 3ds series and thus benefiting both new and old 3ds owners.
 
Sony are based in Japan, as much as Nintendo are. Your original comment showcased how out of touch Nintendo seem to be. What better example to provide than a budding competitor in the same market from the same country & culture?

Well one company is focusing success on the west and succeeding with their console while the other is floundering everywhere.

One of these countries appears to be out of touch with their place in videogames. And doesn't look like they know how to fix it
 
I am happy.

My White 3DSXL is showing its age (was preowned to begin with and needed a replacement screen). Also, it means Majoras Mask 3D is likely to have better specs than before.

Also, improved 3D. Thats a huge selling point for me
 
It's not the first case (of a new model of the same system being "overclocked" thus splitting the userbase).
Of course all the cases have different contex.

Game Boy -> Game Boy Color (GBC came out 8 years after GB)
Wonderswan -> Wonderswan Color (WSC came out less than 2 years after the first WS)
DS-> DSi (6 years? Exclusive games were for the most part released only through digital shop)
 
And I don't understand why it is so difficult to understand that making this system (and the subsequent games required) takes manpower and resources away from development of a new system.

If Nintendo is indeed moving towards a unified platform, the important traits of the next handheld will be the software environment and the infrastructure, not necessarily the hardware. If they need time to get those in order, I'm happy to see them squeeze as much potential as possible from the 3DS which suffered from its own embarrassingly rough launch.

Besides, the only real hardware changes here are minor; an overclocked CPU, the integration of an existing peripheral, NFC, eye-tracking etc. I'd hope this doesn't consume too many resources.

Well one company is focusing success on the west and succeeding with their console while the other is floundering everywhere.

One of these countries appears to be out of touch with their place in videogames. And doesn't look like they know how to fix it

On the macro-level I agree but this is not really an apt indicator for Nintendo's strategic woes.
 
Top Bottom