SargerusBR
I love Pokken!
Just let it go
Because they can't just do that. Again - they'd have to find a private collector willing to cough one up, and private collectors likely won't do that. Plus, even a PRISTINE print from 1977 likely would need a TON of restoration done to it, so you're still spending the money on a new scan and clean-up, and you're right back at the major question: Is there enough of a market for this particular product to make spending all that money worth Disney's time?
Or would Disney look at the last 20 years of Home Video sales of Star Wars in it's various SE/DVD/BD forms and think that spending the millions to get that product out there might not be the greatest investment, even on a mostly promotional level?
I'd love to see it happen, but those are some of the obstacles that get in the way of Disney just plopping the original versions onto a Blu-ray and sending them out the door.
edit: Never seen that Ethan Hawke movie.
Jokes aside, my ideal version is the theratrical one with updated lightsabers / blaster bolts or whatever. No greedo shot first nonsense or silly cg animal additions, but I'm not really angry if they want to update a couple of vfx shots.
Jokes aside, my ideal version is the theratrical one with updated lightsabers / blaster bolts or whatever. No greedo shot first nonsense or silly cg animal additions, but I'm not really angry if they want to update a couple of vfx shots.
Fuck, I had no idea about any of this. That's depressing as hell.This comes up every now and again:
1) Rights issues: Fox still owns the distribution rights to the Original Trilogy til 2020, I believe, and Star Wars (1977) in perpetuity. Disney would have to strike a deal with Fox regardless in order to release them
2) The negative used in the 2004 Lowry scans is from the 1997 Special Editions. The Special Edition negatives have those "fixes" embedded within. A new scan would have to come from those same negatives - relying on fan copies is iffy, as fans aren't supposed to still HAVE those copies, so it's doubtful they'd be willing to volunteer their prints knowing that Lucasfilm would just keep them once they got them.
3) The composite elements for the original effects work DO apparently reside at ILM still, but the problem is you'd have to re-scan the SE negatives, and then re-composite the original elements. OR, you'd have to digitally re-create the original effects in the computer and layer them over the top of the current transfers.
Either way, there's a lot of money that would have to go into any of the above before a blu-ray release of the originals could be released, and it's still up in the air as to whether Disney/Lucasfilm considers the potential return on investment to be worth that cost, especially when there's over a decade's worth of proof that the large majority of consumers don't care enough about the changes (or even LIKE them) to make the Original Versions valuable to anything more than a fraction of the potential audience.
Yes, exactly. I don't mind cleaning up the picture and effects etc., but the problem is they've added so many little bits and pieces over the years that I don't remember which version had which additions! When did they add the extra Jabba the Hutt scene in Episode IV? The 1997 re-release? The DVD release? I have no idea anymore. I think, for the most part, when people say "originals" they mean no "extras". I think a general remaster/clean-up would be OK for most people.Yeah a lot of people seem to forget that not all the changes were negative. I think most of the visual and audio upgrades are a good thing, its the additional content like random characters being pasted into the background or changing how events originally occurred that is mostly ranging from pointless to outright terrible.
I would prefer the 1997 special edition to be re-released. Because honestly, those are the best versions of the films. Just the right amount of effects touch ups and edits for the better, a much better ending composition from John Williams for ROTJ rather than Yub Nub, Jabba scene in A New Hope, and no Hayden Christensen or ADRed Vader "Noooo".
Unfortunately, I have a feeling that best version of these movies is going to be lost to time since everyone just wants the originals and automatically assumes ALL of the revisions were shit.
Unfortunately, I have a feeling that best version of these movies is going to be lost to time since everyone just wants the originals and automatically assumes ALL of the revisions were shit.
Release the original, unaltered trilogy first. Then release updated versions. That's the reason why the fucking special editions have caused so much outrage in the first place... most fans aren't opposed to a special edition with edits, but at least make the original version available for those who want it.
![]()
best version
Are we thinking of the same Jabba in ANH scene here? The one where Jabba doesn't resemble ROTJ Jabba at all, and Han walks over his fucking tail, and Boba Fett just mugs for the camera for like eight straight seconds? No, I'm pretty sure we can lose that.
There's so much shitty late-'90s CGI in the early parts of Star Wars it's almost like they did it as a joke. The first shot in Mos Eisley has like four hundred extras, aliens, speeders and dinosaurs walking in front of the camera for no reason at all. I firmly believe that Lucas intended to do that to the whole trilogy, but then he saw how much work it took, got lazy and half-assed the rest of the special editions. We don't even need to talk about Greedo shooting first and missing from two feet away, Luke's scream as he drops in Cloud City, the music video that breaks out in Jabba's Palace, etc etc. Theatrical or death.
The Jabba scene was good, bad effects at the time or not, it was worth including to set him up for future films.
It sets him up as a chump! Jabba's supposed to be intimidating, we're supposed to be worried about Han owing a debt to the guy. He's a looming threat, sending bounty hunters after Han, and when we finally see him it's in his giant palace with his crowd of sycophants and hangers-on and private army and stuff. Sure, it turns out he can be strangled to death by a ninety pound girl in her undies, but we didn't know that at the time. The added scene for the special edition shows beyond all doubt that Jabba is a complete wuss from the very start, nothing worth worrying about at all. Han figuratively and literally walks all over him.
The Mos Eisley stuff is definitely a VHS special edition addition, too. You can actually see these weird scrub marks around all the added stuff that I assume were part of the matte-ing process on the original film prints.
I don't necessarily think that every SE addition is terrible, but... well, I think the vast majority are. Removal of big black matte lines and upgraded lightsabre effects are great, but personally I'd rather have a theatrical cut with minimal restoration and enhancement than start picking and choosing from all the different versions. I want to see them as they were in the cinema.
YI don't believe that CG cavalcade in Mos Eisley was added until the DVD release, not the 97 special edition, but I could be wrong about that.
Jokes aside, my ideal version is the theratrical one with updated lightsabers / blaster bolts or whatever. No greedo shot first nonsense or silly cg animal additions, but I'm not really angry if they want to update a couple of vfx shots.
Say what you will about the 1997 edition, I prefer it. Cloud City looks gorgeous in that version. Way better than the original version
Well previously the closest to a theatrical release was the 2006 editions that were purely theatrical - no SE updates what-so-ever and people whinged about that. You can't please everyone.
Yeah, Empire definitely gets off the lightest. With the exception of that stupid scream they give Luke (which has since been taken out), I can't really think of anything too offensive in there. I'd agree that the updated Cloud City looks really nice too.
Slightly off-topic, but I got to ask (since we're talking about original versions here) -
How come Star Wars fan are obsessed about every little change yet totally accept the name change of the original Star Wars?
Not only is that was stupid and a bad name for a movie, it eventually led to the fucking prequels.
I would buy a theatrical edition Blu Ray set so hard it'd make your head spin. I still have my VHS set of the trilogy sitting on my shelf, though I have to rely on the Despecialized Editions thesedays because I got rid of my VCR years ago.
The Despecialized Editions are worth Googling for anyone interested in the best remastering job we're likely to see until Disney has a crack. It's all done by one guy named Harmy, I think, who's edited together near perfect theatrical cuts of all three movies from pretty much any source he can get his hands on: DVDs, the Blu Rays, HDTV broadcasts, Laserdisc, etc. They're not Blu Ray quality, but it's really incredible work all the same. He even did a Despecialized Remastered edition for Star Wars (720p, about 15GB) a couple of years ago, though every time I check back I find that he's still trying to perfect it rather than moving on to the other two movies. I can't exactly blame him, since it must be an incredible time sink.
I don't think I've ever called it A New Hope in my life. It's always just been Star Wars.
Didn't George Lucus destroy the original negatives when he remastered them?
This comes up every now and again:
1) Rights issues: Fox still owns the distribution rights to the Original Trilogy til 2020, I believe, and Star Wars (1977) in perpetuity. Disney would have to strike a deal with Fox regardless in order to release them
Am I the only one who thinks it's ridiculous that someone can own the rights to something they don't own anymore? Rights laws are a joke.
Wait, why didn't you buy this when it came out in 2008?
http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Original_unaltered_trilogy_(DVD)
I believe the unaltered version gimmick would sell tons.
there has been a dvd releae of it a few years ago, as far as I know it bombed.
the desire for these unaltered versions isnt as high as the internet makes you think.
Jokes aside, my ideal version is the theratrical one with updated lightsabers / blaster bolts or whatever. No greedo shot first nonsense or silly cg animal additions, but I'm not really angry if they want to update a couple of vfx shots.
Wait, why didn't you buy this when it came out in 2008?
http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Original_unaltered_trilogy_(DVD)
As I've written above, it was a hack-job of a release. In truth, yes, the casual viewer probably doesn't really care about the different versions of Star Wars, but that's exactly the reason why it probably didn't sell well at all. The only ones who want to buy it are also the ones who give a damn about image quality. So they just dropped the ball with their target audience.
Assuming they got that right it probably would have sold like hotcakes.
I honestly doubt that, I bought them, and of course I wasnt 100% happy with them either. but I'm certain most people who care about watching the original cut of the movies, bought this version. I think (and disney pretty sure, too) that a good version wouldnt sell that much more.
I doubt that, it sold poorly because everyone who cares about that version knew it was poor. If Disney makes a Blu-ray edition that is visual great, it will sell.
I honestly doubt that, I bought them, and of course I wasnt 100% happy with them either. but I'm certain most people who care about watching the original cut of the movies, bought this version. I think (and disney pretty sure, too) that a good version wouldnt sell that much more.
I have the VHS tapes from back in the day, but no I did not because they sucked and I don't care that much. If they release a Blu Ray, I would bite.are you telling me you didnt buy it? its still the only way to get that version.
are you telling me you didnt buy it? its still the only way to get that version.
It's not even the best way to get that particular transfer. That would be LaserDisc.
I had a laser disc rip on dvd, that the version I used before the 2008 release.
I don't mean a LaserDisc rip. I mean the actual LaserDisc.
It's like the DVD, but without the compression.
That's how pathetic the theatrical DVDs are.
people want the movie on dvd/blu ray though, no everyone as or wants a laserdisc player. thinking in a niche like that is the same reason why people think the relese of the original cut, even in a perfect version, would be a sucess. it wouldnt.