Disney, release the original Star Wars movies already!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Wait... what? Are you serious?

It's a bit (or quite a bit) of work to reassemble them, but nothing that can't be done. Not to mention they can use existing prints as a shortcut.

The conclusion from this very long and detailed article (seriously an excellent read!): http://secrethistoryofstarwars.com/savingstarwars.html

The negative could be re-conformed to its original configuration, using the original, saved pieces, but this is problematic due to handling issues (and losing more frames). When Robert Harris restored Godfather last year, he had to do it entirely digitally, saying that if any pin-registered mechanism were to touch the negative it would crumble. In Star Wars' case, using scans of the separation masters is perfectly viable, and though IPs and Technicolor prints are not ideal for masters they could be usable if cleaned up digitally. Perhaps the easiest option would be to simply follow the 1997 restoration pattern but in the digital realm: scan the negative in 8K, then scan the stored pre-SE shots or re-comp them, and fill in any damaged areas with IPs or separation masters, reconstructing the original cut, then digitally remove dirt and damage, and finally use a Technicolor print as a color reference for the Digital Intermediate created. Such a product would be theatrically viable, as pristine as when it had been shot, and 100% faithful in image and color to the original release.

The pricetag of doing a project like this would likely be under a million dollars. Jim Ward claims that Lucasfilm sold $100 million in DVDs in a single day when the refurbished Star Wars films came out in 2004, and while this figure might not be replicated (though in my opinion it probably would, if given a comparable marketing campaign) clearly there would be worthwhile profit.
 
Hayden Christensen sucks but... it really doesn't make sense to have Shaw-Anakin there anymore either. You're supposed to look at that person and see Anakin, but to
post-prequel
viewers who are familiar with an Anakin in their head, they'd think "who is that old man???"

Prequels? What prequels? There are no prequels.
 
Screw anyone who didn't like the Ewok tribal song ending. This is the problem with cherry picking what to update. Other people have shitty opinions... Just release the theatrical version.
 
Screw anyone who didn't like the Ewok tribal song ending. This is the problem with cherry picking what to update. Other people have shitty opinions... Just release the theatrical version.

Star Wars is crying out for a Criterion Collection release, or something of that calibre; it's cinematic history that needs chronicling. If you start delving into which bits to enhance, which additional scenes to include, you start missing the forest for the trees. Personally, I'd prefer to have them in all their late '70s, early '80s glory, with big ugly matte lines, vaseline smears and Wolfman costumes. These movies are closing in on forty years old, and I am 100% OK with that. Those old effects look dated to our 2014 eyeballs, sure, but it's OK for 40 year old things to look dated. In 2034 it's going to look even worse, and in 2114 only future-hipsters are going to bother unplugging from the Matrix to watch non-interactive, meatspace, two-dimensional 'movies'. "You mean I have to use my eyeballs?"

It's this thought that we're hot shit with our 2014 CG technology that led to the Special Editions in the first place. Lucas was so smitten with these new-fangled computers that he went hog wild and started attacking the original negatives. That stuff looks laughable today, and ludicrously out of place with the rest of the effects in those movies, but in the fullness of time that's going to be true for any era in which we try and enhance these movies. These are the thoughts that lead to Yoda being replaced with CG because the puppet can't backflip, or entire battle scenes being redone because kids today need more excitement, or all the human characters being redrawn to match up with our own self-images when we all evolve gills or whatever. No thank you. I will take an unenhanced, totally faithful digitisation of an existing film reel, if you please.
 
I think the Blade Runner model would be the ideal situation; a Blu-ray boxset that includes all significant cuts and versions. It's interesting how people welcome Ridley Scott's revisionism yet revile George Lucas for his - in fact, I think a sizable number of fans regard The Final Cut to be the definitive version of Blade Runner, including myself. The key difference is that Scott has allowed for the original theatrical cut to be readily available to the masses - even if he himself finds it to be unrepresentative of his vision - and that is to be respected. Consumer choice is important; I think if Lucas had offered an unaltered version for purists and film preservationists alongside a special edition from the beginning, there would have been a lot less controversy about the changes.

Now, a really cool Star Wars special edition would be some sort of customizable Blu-ray where you could manually turn on/off individual changes in the menu, effectively allowing you to create your own version.
 
Isn't there some online fan project out there dedicated to restoring the original theatrical versions? I heard something about it a few months ago.

EDIT: And I remember the original VHS of A New Hope definitely did not have the updated lightsaber effects. I remember watching Kenobi's duel with Vader and wondering why their lightsabers were dying out about 50% of the time.

I thought the dying lightsabers were intentional as a kid.

Regardless, I would prefer they not muck around with updated effects. I don't think films should be treated like video games; they shouldn't be "patched" or modded, unless we're talking about instances where studio interference ruined the original cut (like Blade Runner). Wiping over flaws is essentially rewriting interesting history.

It's interesting how people welcome Ridley Scott's revisionism yet revile George Lucas for his - in fact, I think a sizable number of fans regard The Final Cut to be the definitive version of Blade Runner, including myself.

It's not that interesting. The theatrical cut of Star Wars was a massive cultural phenomenon, loved by audiences and praised by critics of the time. The theatrical cut of Blade Runner was met with a mixed response from critics and audiences, and all the major players who worked on the film hated the studio-ordered additions.
 
Has anyone mentioned George Lucas's passionate campaign before congress a few decades back to prevent companies making changes to older films? It's probably common knowledge, but it's worth posting.

"A copyright is held in trust by its owner until it ultimately reverts to public domain. American works of art belong to the American public; they are part of our cultural history.

People who alter or destroy works of art and our cultural heritage for profit or as an exercise of power are barbarians, and if the laws of the United States continue to condone this behavior, history will surely classify us as a barbaric society. The preservation of our cultural heritage may not seem to be as politically sensitive an issue as "when life begins" or "when it should be appropriately terminated," but it is important because it goes to the heart of what sets mankind apart. Creative expression is at the core of our humanness. Art is a distinctly human endeavor. We must have respect for it if we are to have any respect for the human race."

Here's an article with details on the case in question - http://savestarwars.com/doasisay.html

I wonder why his opinion changed?
$$$$$$
 
Has anyone mentioned George Lucas's passionate campaign before congress a few decades back to prevent companies making changes to older films? It's probably common knowledge, but it's worth posting.



Here's an article with details on the case in question - http://savestarwars.com/doasisay.html

I wonder why his opinion changed?
$$$$$$

Lucas is not a hypocrite because he was railing against film studios altering films without the director's permission. Lucas was free to do with his own films as he pleased.

And before people say that he didn't direct ESB & ROTJ, Lucas got Irvin Kershner's permission to alter Empire. And Richard Marquand was just a director in name only.
 
And Richard Marquand was just a director in name only.

This isn't really true. Marquand directed most of Jedi - it's just Lucas didn't really like a LOT of that direction, and heavily re-edited the film into the shape he wanted it in once Marquand turned in his cut.

But Marquand did direct Return of the Jedi. You can't just say he "doesn't count" for the purposes of making Lucas look a little less hypocritical for altering Jedi like that.
 
97 special editions are shit. Come on. You guys must be high. CG Jaba looked awful, even back then. Plus it ruins the mystery and allure as to who or what he is. No surprise, no build up. He just shows up. All of the added effects and changes were unnecessary too. I hate em

Fox needs to stop being assholes and just let it go. Give the people what they want: The original, theatrical, unedited, unchanged, unaltered version that we all grew up watching as kids.
 
Lucas is not a hypocrite because he was railing against film studios altering films without the director's permission. Lucas was free to do with his own films as he pleased.

And before people say that he didn't direct ESB & ROTJ, Lucas got Irvin Kershner's permission to alter Empire. And Richard Marquand was just a director in name only.

You're not wrong. The lines I highlighted were more my point - that these pieces of culture belong to the American public and that altering them for profit is barbaric.

I know that Star Wars technically/legally/intellectually belongs to George and he's technically permitted to do whatever he wants, but I still disagree with it personally and I think it's at least a little hypocritical to alter them for profit after railing against that exact thing before congress in the past.
 
97 special editions are shit. Come on. You guys must be high. CG Jaba looked awful, even back then. Plus it ruins the mystery and allure as to who or what he is. No surprise, no build up. He just shows up. All of the added effects and changes were unnecessary too. I hate em

Fox needs to stop being assholes and just let it go. Give the people what they want: The original, theatrical, unedited, unchanged, unaltered version that we all grew up watching as kids.

Yeah, but if we take into account the PT, there's no need to have any mystery around Jabba, since he's already in Episode 1.

But yes, original unedited versions are way overdue.
 
Fox needs to stop being assholes and just let it go. Give the people what they want: The original, theatrical, unedited, unchanged, unaltered version that we all grew up watching as kids.

I don't know if this is a "Fox are being assholes" situation at all, really.
 
It will happen eventually.

Maybe next xmas. I have a feeling Episode VII will get pushed out of next year for some reason.

I think December is a lock regardless of how the film turns out. It already got pushed back from May, and Disney is pretty adamant on a 2015 release as they've basically promised investors a return on that acquisition.
 
December 18th is happening. They're opening up the purse-strings to make sure the post-production gets done on time. It's not going to be cheap.
 
I'd love the original versions - or as others have said, the og versions with updated FX but no awful new shit. But really, what I want right now are digital downloads of the OT. iTunes is the only place where I ever really buy music or videos and I'd much prefer that over a blu ray that I'll lose. I was pretty shocked to find out recently they aren't available digitally anywhere.
 
If you ask me, I'm pretty sure we won't to be denied a proper DVD/Blu-Ray release of the original theatrical cut of Episodes IV, V, & VI. Especially since that opportunity is one that the Disney Corporation will use to get the same fan base on board to promote the upcoming Episode VII.
 
Such a shame, everytime i think about it or read about it somewhere i want to sit and watch the original versions, i don't have a VHS anymore and no DVDs of the originals. I want them on bluray.... i have not seen these movies since Episode 1 was released in '99 and the were a big part of my life growing up.

It will be a glorious day when i can finally see them as i have seen them when i was a kid/teen, but that day maybe will never come. I even changed my mind about any fx enhancements at all. I now want the janky ass stop motion, the original music at the end of RotJ and Alec Guinness as Obi Wans ghost.

I've bought a lot of movies from the 80's that got transferred to HD, the last one was Robocop 1 a few months ago, i love watching these movies again and having something missing as big as Star Wars is just sad.
 
Checked out a bit of that despecialized version. It looks so beautiful.

Also, I gotta say it's pretty damn impressive how good the special effects looked (specially during the trench run).
 
Thanks to whoever put me onto the Despecialized Editions in another thread, those are really fantastic.

Are we permitted to talk about where to find these?... I've only ever found the IV Despecialized Edition and I'd love to get my hands on V and VI, but is that frowned upon here?...

Also, any recommendations on how to watch them on a tv? My blu-ray player has a usb slot, but I don't have a USB stick big enough to hold the movie...
 
I was hoping this got bumped with news. A rumor will do for now. It's better than nothing.

If Disney gave us Blu-rays of the original cuts, maybe with some of the basic cleaned up effects, I would forgive for anything/everything else. JJ Abrams can do his worst (or is that his best?) and I won't care if I can have those original cuts.
 
the rumor is bullshit tho, because it's part of the same rumor that says Lucasfilm is gonna de-canonize the Prequels, which is absolutely not happening.

Fox & Disney will likely come to a financial arrangement at some point in the next few years, I'm sure. But this rumor is not proof of those machinations getting underway.
 
He'd replace it with the Nic Cage edition where every character was played by himself.

Would be miles better than the last 3.

717.jpg
.
 
I think all these rumors are based on fanboy hopes since JJ Abrams is going to pump Episode VII with too much fan fiction. People get these crazy ideas in their mind and probably misheard someone saying it be cool to re-release them since Lucas is gone, cause people believe Lucas is the only reason they don't exist.

It is proven that a lot of the saved film reels were in bad shape and they had to take multiple different reels to create one good reel to edit (and they had to edit them to restore them to original as well).

Also, Fox.
 
I didn't mind the special editions when they strictly just updated effects.

In the special edition of A New Hope I love that you actually see the X-Wings leaving Yavin.

In the original movie the X-Wings are represented by little white dots in the distance.
 
To be honest, I feel like no matter what, a blu-ray release of the originals will be a disappointment.

I want the originals, restored, with the improvements done to the visuals (like the Blade Runner final cut) minus all the additional scenes.

I feel like what we will get will be a blu-ray release of the originals with all the original mistakes, etc, prior to the 97 SEs
 
But that's the whole POINT of releasing the Originals.
Most people consider the final cut of blade runner the definitive cut...

I dont care to have the original movies as they were shown in theaters on blu-ray. I want them restored, remastered, with all all visual fuckups cleaned up. Just leave it at that, and leave out all the added scenes.
 
Most people consider the final cut of blade runner the definitive cut...

That's completely beside the point. People don't want The Originals because they want a "definitive cut"

They want the originals because they want The Originals.

Hell, a lot of people bought that Blade Runner set not for the Final Cut (which isn't even that different from the "Director's Cut") but for the Workprint Cut, which wasn't even restored. And even more people bought it to get the theatrical and the European cuts, because those didn't exist on blu OR dvd up until that point, either.

People want the originals because they want The Originals.
 
they don't own the rights to A New Hope. Fox won't give that up unless they get a huge payoff.
Disney bought Marvel for 4 bill, Star Wars for 4 billion and that shitty youtube makers whatever for like 500 million all in a what? 4-5 year period?

I think they can afford to buy A New Hope.
 
Disney bought Marvel for 4 bill, Star Wars for 4 billion and that shitty youtube makers whatever for like 500 million all in a what? 4-5 year period?

I think they can afford to buy A New Hope.


Fox will never sell the distribution rights to Star Wars. If anything they will sign deals allowing Disney to use it in OT box sets in which Fox gets a hefty cut of the profits. Fox will probably even be able to get a cut of all revenue derived from OT merchandise in general in such a deal.
 
Can't believe Disney spent billions for the franchise and didn't secure the rights to the original film.

Because they're literally unable to, Fox owns it forever. You can't buy what won't be sold.

Fox definitely has tables and charts of what income the original Star Wars would give them over X amount of years vs what Disney would offer. Disney would have to essentially pay more than the film would bring in, based off Fox's own research, meaning they'd legitimately lose money buying the original film.
 
this is brought up constantly and its ridiculous
fox and disney will work out a deal, its that simple. why does everyone think fox is just going to deny all attempts at releasing star wars? lol
how the hell do you think the movie has been released so many times, already
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom