Alright you win, here I am. But no that generalizing statement of, "I'm not wasting my time w/ you" is not true w/ most of the people on these boards, only you. You've stated yourself that you like to argue for the sake of arguing and wont back down even if your point isn't correct (playing devils advocate). So I usually find arguing with you completely a waste of time and just consider you more of an extreme for the sake of being extreme poster.
I don't argue just for the sake of argument. I almost always believe in what I'm saying. My world stance is that criticism compels far more interesting conversations than circle jerking, and so I tend to participate far more in one type of discussion than the other. I play devil's advocate occasionally, but I doubt I can even recall the last time I did that because it's very rare. And it's almost always in the service of a point I do believe in.
And yes, I'm generally more positive when it comes to the games I play and why not? You can still be critical, yet civil when it comes to a franchise you enjoy or want to enjoy. And there was no lack of hyperbolic criticisms in the AC3 threads, it was really not necessary I jump on board w/ that and the constant berating of something (when it's so damn exaggerated) get's under my skin.
I don't care that you're positive. You understand that, right? This criticism of your behavior in these threads is not about you being endlessly optimistic. It's about you attacking others who are being critical, and refusing to actually address their points. Instead, you rely entirely on some commentary about how bad the community is being or how excessive the criticism is and then back away whenever anyone prods you to actually back your position up on why you feel the criticisms are unwarranted.
But in this case and the post specifically I was just voicing my goddam annoyance w/ this communities never ending drama regarding every small detail... really the word "genuine" set them off.
Let me see if I can point to the problem here, and maybe help you understand how it comes across.
Darknessbear said:
"I'm all for voicing criticisms and standing to what your vision to what a game should be, but this is no longer a community based on the love of a game, but more of a group dedicated to relentlessly bashing a game even if it is unwarranted at times."
For you, a community for any game must be based on love for it to be a worthwhile community. Whereas, on neoGAF, these communities are not based on love. They're also not based on hate. The community is based on
discussion. The problem I have is that you keep dismissing criticism in a way that is trying to stifle discussion. The problem you have is that you think the criticism is stifling the ability for the love to foster and take over, when that's not what neoGAF is about anyway.
If you want a community based almost entirely on 'love', you must find some fanboy community usually focused entirely on the game you like, and then you can have the rainbow/unicorn/fairy tale topic that you seem to desire.
If you want a community based on discussion, no matter how harsh that discussion might be, neoGAF has what you want. And honestly, it can often have great circle jerks, so it's not like you can't find places to enjoy what you're looking for. When I went into the Ghost Trick thread to critique the many problems it had, I was like the first person in a dozen pages who had even said anything negative about the title. The reaction in that topic was embarrassing, but it seems to be what you're looking for. So I recommend you maybe enter a game thread AFTER it has been moved into a game community forum, since that tends to be when the only people left are those who desperately love the game in question.
Darknessbear said:
It's essentially everything I think is wrong with the gaming community now... wanting/hoping for a game to fail/be bad and getting irate when it receives positive scores. But I'm not saying criticisms should not be discussed, by all means it should be a central discussion. But when you start getting worked up at a developer for things that are so trivial it becomes almost a joke (the way a character says a certain line of dialogue, how a person words their twitter, uncontextualized quotes... or other aesthetic things that wont be mentioned) it becomes a nuisance.
I think in this case, the feeling was that they were somehow suggesting that reviews under a certain point were not 'genuine.' It was a bit kneejerk, but I don't think it was from a desire to see the game fail or be bad either.