You'd think being against the figurehead of a populist racist movement on such a racially diverse country wouldn't be so hard, but they still manage to fuck it up.
I'm allowed to vote for whomever I want to. If you say otherwise, get fucked.
I'm not a registered democrat or republican. I vote for whomever I think would do the best job. Most of the time, that person is already on the ticket. This time that's not the case.
Is DWS really joining Clinton's campaign? I can't find anything online that says she is...
Maybe a joke added by a mod to the end of the title?
Is DWS really joining Clinton's campaign? I can't find anything online that says she is...
Maybe a joke added by a mod to the end of the title?
Debbie Wasserman Schultz immediately joins Hillary Clinton campaign after resignation
Washington Times‎ - 13 hours ago
Man, I do have to question Hillary's immediate hire, though. Corruption is beside the point; it's a very poor move, regardless. It's making her look bad, even if all the claims were nonsense.
Why not give her a job after the election? To have her join the campaign now is not a good look.
That's just as bad as her getting the job now.
If Donald wins the election historians will talk about how Hillary and the Democrats lost because they ran an unpopular candidate with 30 years of baggage and a history of sloppy politics instead of actually having a real primary.
So many up and coming Democrats like Warren, Booker, Tim Kaine, and the Daytons of the party sat out.
Where the fuck did I say you're not "allowed"? Before losing your mind telling me to get fucked, maybe learn basic reading comprehension. Yes, you are indeed allowed, and I am allowed to offer my opinion of that choice, which is that it's cowardly, petty, useless, and counter-productive. The fact that you believe you're somehow edgy or noble by voting for someone not on the ticket is hilarious. Kind of like going to a restaurant and requesting a made up menu item, adding an option in a multiple choice test, etc. If you're proud of yourself for lacking the analytical skills to choose between available options, even if neither of the options are your perfect choice, then that's a weakness in yourself. The fact that you think its a strength is sad.
That doesn't say HRC is giving her a job - it just said HRC will help in her re-election to Congress campaign.
Am I reading it wrong?
These are the same people who sank Howard Dean in favor of John Kerry, costing us 4 more years of Bush. Bernie would have torn Trump apart, but it was Clinton's turn.
It's very difficult to prove who hacked what, but this is pretty conclusive:
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/07/25/us/politics/donald-trump-russia-emails.html
No, I agree - I haven't found anything that says she is "Joining the Clinton campaign"...looks like she is just going to help her. Who knows what that actually means...
These are the same people who sank Howard Dean in favor of John Kerry, costing us 4 more years of Bush. Bernie would have torn Trump apart, but it was Clinton's turn.
No, I agree - I haven't found anything that says she is "Joining the Clinton campaign"...looks like she is just going to help her. Who knows what that actually means...
But in a reaction statement to reporters Sunday, Mrs. Clinton gave Ms. Wasserman Schultz a soft landing by announcing that she would join the Clinton campaign.
“I am glad that she has agreed to serve as honorary chair of my campaign’s 50-state program to gain ground and elect Democrats in every part of the country,” Mrs. Clinton said in the statement.
The statement went on to say that Ms. Wasserman Schultz “will continue to serve as a surrogate for my campaign nationally.”
That doesn't say HRC is giving her a job - it just said HRC will help in her re-election to Congress campaign.
Am I reading it wrong?
No, I agree - I haven't found anything that says she is "Joining the Clinton campaign"...looks like she is just going to help her. Who knows what that actually means...
Lol no. People have short memories as to how awful a campaign Bernie ran. Bernie would have lost in the GE
"It was Clinton's turn". What a stupid thing to say.
If they lose its no ones fault but their ownNah, the Democrats will just blame 3rd party voters like they did in 2000.
https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/757318117391474688
https://www.hillaryclinton.com/brie...nal-committee-chair-debbie-wasserman-schultz/
"I'm glad she agreed to serve as honorary chair of my campaign..."
That doesn't say HRC is giving her a job - it just said HRC will help in her re-election to Congress campaign.
Am I reading it wrong?
Clinton says that Wasserman Schultz will serve as honorary chair of her campaigns 50-state program to help elect Democrats around the country.
It's joining the campaign."Honorary Chair" isn't a job capacity - it's a glorified cheerleader. Same thing Obama is doing for her right now, except he is POTUS.
No, I agree - I haven't found anything that says she is "Joining the Clinton campaign"...looks like she is just going to help her. Who knows what that actually means...
Something can be truthful and stupid at once.Lol no. People have short memories as to how awful a campaign Bernie ran. Bernie would have lost in the GE
"It was Clinton's turn". What a stupid thing to say.
She should not be anywhere near Clinton's campaign at this point.
"Honorary Chair" isn't a job capacity - it's a glorified cheerleader. Same thing Obama is doing for her right now, except he is POTUS.
Glorified cheerleader or not, it still looks pretty bad to give her an honorary title the day she announces she's stepping down and a day or two after the email leak.
"Honorary Chair" isn't a job capacity - it's a glorified cheerleader. Same thing Obama is doing for her right now, except he is POTUS.
How is being a named person in a campaign not joining the campaign?I agree that it looks bad, and that she shouldn't be anywhere near the campaign - but I still disagree that she officially "Joined the Clinton campaign" with her honorary title.
I agree that it looks bad, and that she shouldn't be anywhere near the campaign - but I still disagree that she officially "Joined the Clinton campaign" with her honorary title.
So why bring on somebody who will only bring down your campaign?
Does Hillary really need somebody's expertise who lost a shit ton of seats in the 2014 election?
Either way its a stupid fucking move.
How is being a named person in a campaign not joining the campaign?
I agree that it looks bad, and that she shouldn't be anywhere near the campaign - but I still disagree that she officially "Joined the Clinton campaign" with her honorary title.
I agree that it looks bad, and that she shouldn't be anywhere near the campaign - but I still disagree that she officially "Joined the Clinton campaign" with her honorary title.
Something can be truthful and stupid at once.
Explain why the only actual challenge to a non-incumbent during primary season for one of the two major political parties came from an Independent?
Unless the argument is that there are no Presidential candidates other than Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden and one declined to run, which would be an amusing tactic given our current President's stature in summer 2007, what other explanation is there?
I'm team Hill all the way but this is gymnastics (that may not be needed, it's a bad look but who knows if this will hurt in the long run).Oh no doubt - but people framing it like she's gonna be part of Hillary's cabinet are way off.
It shows HRC is loyal, at least.
The "Honorary" part. She is again, just a cheerleader.
You wouldn't say Obama is part of her campaign, but he is cheerleading on her behalf.
Same thing with DWS, except she ain't the POTUS.
That's just the way I view it.
It would also look bad, but at least it wouldn't influence the election. Not sure what they're thinking.That's just as bad as her getting the job now.
Oh no doubt - but people framing it like she's gonna be part of Hillary's cabinet are way off.
It shows HRC is loyal, at least.
The "Honorary" part. She is again, just a cheerleader.
You wouldn't say Obama is part of her campaign, but he is cheerleading on her behalf.
Same thing with DWS, except she ain't the POTUS.
That's just the way I view it.
Welcome to politics where a good deed leads to a favored owed. Wonder how many good deeds still need to be repaid.
Who the fuck cares if Hillary is loyal to somebody like that? To the average american it comes across as corrupt in a time where the system is the debate. Democrats should be working to try and make government as efficient and transparent as possible so that the public can be convinced that it can do greater good as opposed to just clogging social and economic issues up.
Either it shows Jeb Bush levels of political ignorance (which reminds me of her first campaign in 2008)
I'm not even a Bernie fan but Hillary's history of shit politicking is gonna get an orange reality tv star the white house.
Shit like this, combined with the Kaine VP pick, just show us all that she believes she'll beat Trump no matter how badly she fucks up in the interm.
The Democrats are that confident. Hopefully, that confidence is warranted.
Wait why is Kaine a problem? He has been great so far.
That's just the way I view it.