• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Doctor Who Series 2011 |OT| Wibbly Wobbly Timey Wimey Stuff

Status
Not open for further replies.

scarybore

Member
985boi said:
The Doctor Who blu-ray's is only 1080i? WTF?

I might be wrong, but I believe that technically, there is no 1080p standard with blu-rays at 25 or 50fps. I think what the BBC usually do is encode the video as 1080i at 50fps on the disc and your blu-ray player deinterlaces it and outputs it as 1080p at 25fps.

In either case, the only BBC blu-ray that I have is Sherlock and that looks fantastic, I really wouldn't worry about it.
 
Clegg said:
It's only a compliment if you're a bitter lunatic.

I quite liked Miles' stuff until it became what were basically little more than bitter diatribes. Even if I didn't always agree with him, his writing was generally interesting and entertaining.

Still follow him on Twitter though. He posts some funny stuff there occasionally.
 
378767_10150907444290114_723970113_21266310_2034427266_n.jpg


Getting my Doctor Who on.
 

Clegg

Member
Box of Bunnies said:
I quite liked Miles' stuff until it became what were basically little more than bitter diatribes. Even if I didn't always agree with him, his writing was generally interesting and entertaining.

Still follow him on Twitter though. He posts some funny stuff there occasionally.
Oh I liked him too. Unfortunately he lost the plot a few years ago.

He's bitter over not being asked to write for the show. It's all so very petty.
 

isny

napkin dispenser
Couple of photos for ya'll from my recent trip to the Doctor Who Exhibition in London. (Click for bigger pics)

I'll uploaded more next month when I'm back home. I'm still currently traveling and outside of the country.


Gift Shop



Ten's TARDIS



Merch (Exclusive Mug and TARDIS Keychain)

 
Who movie on the way?

http://www.slashfilm.com/harry-potter-director-david-yates-bigscreen-doctor-who/

Russell T. Davies and then Steven Moffat have done their own transformations, which were fantastic, but we have to put that aside and start from scratch. We want a British sensibility [in a screenwriter], but having said that, Steve Kloves wrote the Potter films and captured that British sensibility perfectly, so we are looking at American writers too.

Who movie in TV continuity? Yes, please.

Who movie with it's own continuity. No thanks.
 
infiniteloop said:
Who movie on the way?

http://www.slashfilm.com/harry-potter-director-david-yates-bigscreen-doctor-who/



Who movie in TV continuity? Yes, please.

Who movie with it's own continuity. No thanks.
Hmm. I don't think Doctor Who is a franchise in which you necessarily need to worry about continuity. They could get Tennant and Rose if they want a more iconic duo and simply tell an untold story from their run together.

Or, better yet, just get Tennant and have him meet up with a new companion during the period when he's off doing his own shit for a while.

A new companion is necessary IMO, simply because you need a gateway character that can introduce the audience to the strange world of the Doctor. Especially if you plan to have a big budget and be a box office hit.

Getting a new Doctor all together seems like a waste of the existing talent as is. Getting Tennant seems like a great idea, but I think that lessens Matt Smith's role which hurts the franchise as well.

Honestly, the idea of a Who movie doesn't interest me all that much.
 
infiniteloop said:
yeah, but they're talking about starting from scratch. New Doctor, new companion. Nothing from the TV Show.

I guess it will exist in its own separate world. I'd rather they don't bother but if there's money to be made on the concept it will eventually come into existence.
 
I'm cynical, I'm guessing it would be a terrible film. A film that wouldn't bother to fit in with an explainable point in the continuity, with no grasp of how time travel usually works within the constraints of the Doctor Who universe, 'fixed points', 'not crossing one's time line' screw it! The Daleks would be the villains of course because of creative bankruptcy and £, they just wish to exterminate the universe again, expect a repeat of Journey's End but even dumber! Heh add the Master (Jason Isaacs) in as their creator and as the brother of the Doctor. Shoot the whole film as if the camera lens have been covered in dust!

And you know what, it could be a big pile of steaming excrement, the kind to make the Peter Cushing movies look like nostalgic heaven, and I would still pay to watch this film if Alan Rickman was the Doctor.
 
Ganhyun said:
I have to say, that I like Amy Pond better than the other companions except for Rose.

There's nothing better than Amy Pond anywhere on TV. I loooooove her. Beautiful, sassy, just can't get enough of her. She totally makes the show. I started on season 5 and have very little interest on going back just because there's no Amy Pond (plus it's such a cool name).

Also newest doctor is best doctor, so I have like no reason to go back.

As for monster of the week, as a rule I hate it. Usually nothing moves forward and there's no real sense of danger since you know nothing can change. Thus I usually prefer an overarching storyline. I have to say, some of the stand alones are actually pretty good on Doctor Who (in contrast with Supernatural for example), but I still would prefer more focus on a bigger story for next season.
 

Htown

STOP SHITTING ON MY MOTHER'S HEADSTONE
Amy Pond is better than Rose because Amy eventually stopped treating her loving boyfriend like a smear of shit on a sidewalk.
 
Yeah, Rose is a pretty awful person – leaves her boyfriend, her mother, creates nearly apocalyptic circumstances by selfishly saving her father, can't be happy when the Doctor gives her everything she ever wanted: a complete family...

and ultimately settles for Doctor-lite and not the REAL real Doctor. Martha was much better if you ask me.

But Amy is better than all of them.
 

DrForester

Kills Photobucket
King of the Potato People said:
And you know what, it could be a big pile of steaming excrement, the kind to make the Peter Cushing movies look like nostalgic heaven, and I would still pay to watch this film if Alan Rickman was the Doctor.

Entire 2nd act is Alan Rickman telling the companion what TARDIS stands for...



If he wants to bring back some Harry potter Alumni....

David Thewlis (who has apparently been on short lists to play The Doctor since the show came back).

Rupert Grint. GINGER!
 

neojubei

Will drop pants for Sony.
Htown said:
Amy Pond is better than Rose because Amy eventually stopped treating her loving boyfriend like a smear of shit on a sidewalk.


I can agree with this. I felt so sorry for Mickey.
 
infiniteloop said:
Who movie on the way?

http://www.slashfilm.com/harry-potter-director-david-yates-bigscreen-doctor-who/

Who movie in TV continuity? Yes, please.

Who movie with it's own continuity. No thanks.

I'd actually be down for this with no continuity to the TV show. There's no reason the two things can't co-exist.

In fact, I sometimes feel like the current show is held back by its own past sometimes - as much as I love that it acknowledges my favourite eras - like those of Tom Baker and Jon Pertwee. Its having to appeal to new viewers while making 'sense' in light of the decades of TV before. The current series is also hamstrung by decisions made only a few years ago during the RTD era -- all the timelords being dead, the master seemingly disappearing to finish them off, davros definitively gone etc. They have continually doomed and un-doomed the universe - I often feel as though its better to write any iconic villains out ambiguously than to definitively kill them. It is stretching the timey wimey a bit too far to kill and un-kill villains and companions the way they have been.

It seems routine now for the show to try and 'undo' what it has already done; it has been written into a corner so much by some episodes that the only way to do an 'undo' is to do some kind of horrendous deus ex machina reset. When they get to the point of trying to explain to new viewers that the Doctor is on his last generation, and that they're just going to ignore that and move on anyway, it'll have jumped a shark too many imo. At some point it *does* need to begin anew if its to continue.

A movie needn't be creatively bankrupt. As a movie franchise, there's no reason why it couldn't be a sci-fi James Bond -- a franchise that goes on for a long time with a series of different actors. I would love to see Gallifrey with hollywood style production values, adventerous plots with even more ambitious cinematography, an even more epic score etc. Plot wise, I feel like there is unlimited potential for 2 hour story arcs and over-arching stories -- proper studio backing and a team of well-picked writers could really do something amazing. The Battlestar Galactica reimagining is probably my favourite TV show of all time, but I would love to see a movie series of that too - because the core concept is just so great and has so much potential that I will happily give anything a chance that uses it.
 

WanderingWind

Mecklemore Is My Favorite Wrapper
Htown said:
Amy Pond is better than Rose because Amy eventually stopped treating her loving boyfriend like a smear of shit on a sidewalk.

To be fair, Mickey should've never left the friendzone. The guy was a complete wuss and never hesitated to leave Rose in dangerous situations while he pissed himself in fear. Fuck that guy.

Rory deserves his happy ending. Mickey's run on Who should've ended in the rubbish bin where it started.
 
WanderingWind said:
To be fair, Mickey should've never left the friendzone. The guy was a complete wuss and never hesitated to leave Rose in dangerous situations while he pissed himself in fear. Fuck that guy.

Rory deserves his happy ending. Mickey's run on Who should've ended in the rubbish bin where it started.
I thought Mickey turned out pretty badass.
 
No more Martha. Please. She became better once the was off of Who, but please...no more Martha.

And Rory and Amy better get a fucking happy ending. Hell, I would be fine if they ditched Amy and just kept Rory as the sidekick, and I love me some Karen Gillan.
 

Quick

Banned
PhoncipleBone said:
Amy+Rory>Amy alone>Rose (although that is close>Donna>>>>Martha

My sentiments exactly.

I like Martha, but she was the weakest character, in my opinion. And she had a lot of potential to be awesome.
 
Quick said:
My sentiments exactly.

I like Martha, but she was the weakest character, in my opinion. And she had a lot of potential to be awesome.
Yup. Martha was so awful because all she did while with the Doctor was pine for him. I liked Donna because she didn't put up with the Doctor's shit at all. Rose was a nice, sane balance of them all. Amy is like all the extremes of Donna and Martha rolled into a sexier package but better and bearable. But Amy and Rory together is just god tier level companionship.

Martha did get better once away from the Doctor but never really recovered in my eyes.
 

celebi23

Member
infiniteloop said:
Friday, during children in need, there'll be a preview of the christmas ep and a mini-episode written by Moffat.

mazza_pud1.jpg
Awesome! We usually have gotten either one or the other in past years.
 
PalaceBrother said:
What is "Children in need" and are the past "mini episodes" available anywhere?

They are usually added to the DVDs. You can probably just find them on the youtube as well.

The memorable ones are the one between Parting of the Ways and The Christmas Invasion (forgot the name) and "Time Crash".

Also, it wasn't Children in Need, but you should check out "Time" & "Space" as well.

Some years they just had a little sneak peak or a trailer of the Christmas Special.
 

BatDan

Bane? Get them on board, I'll call it in.
According to Wikipedia, the mini episode set between The Parting of the Ways and The Christmas Invasion is also called "Born Again", but most people simply call it "Doctor Who: Children in Need".

Yes, all the mini episodes can be found on YouTube.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom