"You know... Beans really aren't so bad after all."
In a final ouroborous-like reference to the first NewWho filming block, he farts out regeneration energy?
"You know... Beans really aren't so bad after all."
"You know... Beans really aren't so bad after all."
Question: Is there any way The Doctor could acquire more regenerations that wouldn't feel like a deus ex machina?
Easiest way of writing it would be Timelords returning. They set the limits, they can break them. Rassilon and The Master already have.
The number 507 came from the head of Russell T Davies, who wrote the Death Of The Doctor story for The Sarah Jane Adventures, and SFX talked to him about it, and whether this was a permanent rule change in the Doctor Who universe.
"507 - I could not resist!", he admitted. "I was hooting. It'll never stick, though. That 13 lives is stuck in people's heads. It is, isn't it funny? Yet they only said 13 once or twice."
He repeats, too, that a new rule hasn't been established, adding "That's why I'm quite serious that that 507 thing won't stick, because the 13 is too deeply ingrained in the public consciousness.
Thank God you're not a television writer.Doc13 dies and have a throw away line like "It's a good job the Time Lord council isn't around" and move past it.
Thank God you're not a television writer.
fuckin' lol
Yeah, either they ignore it or they go into detail.
I have a tiny little feeling this is way smaller a problem than you guys think.
Isn't Moffatt really against the idea of The Doctor having a nemesis?
Isn't Moffatt really against the idea of The Doctor having a nemesis?
It’s almost impossible to disentangle the qualities of Smith’s tenure as the Doctor from Moffat’s reign as showrunner; they fit each other so well, both in their qualities and their flaws. For some time, it really looked like the eleventh Doctor could become the definitive Who; the standard to judge all the others by. But Smith’s legacy suffers from the fact that something went awry in the writing of the last series; that for all the enjoyable twists and flips as they were in flight, very few episodes nailed the landing.
Because when the script was missing something and the momentum was gone, Smith had a tendency to . . . well, turn it up to Eleven. He’d overcompensate for the exposition dumps and the gaps in narrative sense, twirling and gurning and SHOUTING A LOT and tripping over his own elbows. He would do Hair Acting.
To an extent, the show’s suffered under the weight of its own ambition (a pretty laudable reason). Ultimately, the Moffat/Smith years have fundamentally been about story. Not just the giddy, headlong rush of Moffat’s narrative, but the idea of story as a living, breathing thing - a force of nature in its own right. In Moffworld, the Doctor’s superpower isn’t his mind or his two hearts or his sonic screwdriver; it’s that he’s a legend. He’s a fable passed down the generations, “a goblin, or a trickster”, the thing monsters have nightmares about, the reason our language has the word “doctor”.
This was no subtext; it was all upfront in the plot, as befits a post-Buffy, monsters-are-metaphors TV show. Smith’s first series ended with him escaping oblivion by becoming a bedtime tale he told to the young Amy, her childhood memories a life-support machine; his last with Clara literally jumping into his lifestory to save him, the ultimate sacrifice of giving herself up entirely to his history. It was all about story.
And if there’s been a problem with this last series, beyond the structural flaws and the tonal mis-steps, it’s the lurking feeling that none of these stories really demanded to be told. They didn’t live out in the world, in herds of wild narrative roaming the twilight, just waiting to be discovered and written down. They felt like constructs, awkwardly fitting themselves around external necessities - marketing material in search of a plot, or an extended trailer for the upcoming 50th anniversary episode. They forgot to bring the mythic.
I just hope Moffatt brings him out with a bang. Tennant deserved considerably better than End of Time.
I do not get why they keep saying that. I consider the last 10-15 minutes of End of Time the best of the best. It starts with four knocks on a glass door.
The 13 regen limit was imposed by the Time lords. They granted the master a new regen cycle for the time war and offered him one during The five doctors in exchange for his help.
The limit was likely in place to stop someone having an insanely profound effect on time (like the doctor has) and to limit current population of time lords at any given time.
In Sarah Jane the doctor says he can change 507 times.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_9D-2HJMD9s
Throw away line or not it's something they could fall back on.
The 13 lives thing seems silly to me, Any explanation around it is just going to cause confusion for fans of NuWho only. Just ignore that aspect completely. Doc13 dies and have a throw away line like "It's a good job the Time Lord council isn't around" and move past it.
The Master Race was some CBBC level shit that rivals and possibly outdoes the Series 1 burping bins/farting aliens.
Great article.He's against other Time Lords specifically, I think. Thinks the Master is crap, etc. He believes that having other Time Lords over him weakens the Doctor as a character.
New Statesman has a wonderful article on the Moffat and Smith era, and its legacy. A snippet:
It's a really good - and I feel accurate - piece. I agree with it, but I've talked to death in this thread about Moffat's story-driven writing versus the RTD character-driven writing. Matt's going to be well-remembered, for sure.
http://www.newstatesman.com/culture/2013/06/matt-smith-rise-and-fall-hipster-doctor
I think all of the finales are briliant.
The Master Race was some CBBC level shit that rivals and possibly outdoes the Series 1 burping bins/farting aliens.
Surely you're forgetting about The Sound of Drums/Last of the Time Lords. I certainly try to, anyway.
Surely you're forgetting about The Sound of Drums/Last of the Time Lords. I certainly try to, anyway.
Surely you're forgetting about The Sound of Drums/Last of the Time Lords. I certainly try to, anyway.
Best Tennant finale, by a mile.
It only has 10 bad minutes, unlike the bad hour that is Journey's End.
It had Daleks shitting on Cybermen (admittedly with some neat dialogue), and the long, tedious Bad Wolf Bay bit. I'd stick on Last of the Time Lords before that any day.Oh, get out of here. You're just trolling us at this point. How is Doomsday not the best Tennant finale? How?!
It had Daleks and Cybermen!
I don't think I am. It was a resolution that was handled poorly, sure, but that's all it was. I actually think the Archangel Network was a rather neat solution to it all, and one that was neatly seeded throughout the series. It just needed a more compelling method of putting it up on screen.Anyway, you're underestimating how bad those 10 minutes are. They worm their way back through the narrative of the rest of the episode (and Sound of Drums and arguably the climax of Utopia) and just make everything immensely unsatisfying by way of being complete nonsense. And then they reset the whole thing so nothing of value actually occurred at all.
Wish Tennant would come back
The difference being Moffat's smart enough to set the tone to match that of a fairytale, whilst the S3 finale comes off as sci-fi until the reveal of Jesus Doctor.
Oh, and they don't hint that Jesus Doctor is a possibility at all! It's a complete ass-pull.
The Bad Wolf Bay goodbye is heartbreaking, you monster.
I can't believe people like you still exist. He's gone-get over it!
They seem really inefficient at shooting the show.Can someone explain something to me. I always read about how hard the schedule is and how it's non stop. Smith himself said it's 24/7 on a recent interview. But it's only what, 13 episodes a year? How long does shooting take?
Tennant was shit. There... I said it.
They seem really inefficient at shooting the show.
This is pretty funny, intentionally avoiding setups and allusions to force a deus ex. It's like bizarro world writing.I read "The Writer's Tale" and found it really illuminating as to the narrative and storytelling decisions RTD made. He is very much against ever hinting towards things like that. He'd never ever have a line that would suggest the Network could be used as a solution to an impending problem. He would outline what it could do. Then much later suddenly have what he previously said it could do twisted to form the solution.
He illustrates this really well with the scene in "Last of the Time Lords" where the Doctor rushes into the TARDIS and finds it's been turned into a "paradox engine". He says other writers would have a scene earlier on in the episode where the Master talks about building one, or an underling informs him that "the paradox engine is almost ready" or something, so the viewer knows one is about to appear and so when the Doctor finds his TARDIS has been turned into one, you're like 'ah this is the thing the Master previously referred to, now I'm seeing it.' While for Russell that would be bad writing - he wants the first time you ever hear of the concept of a paradox engine to be the moment when you're actually seeing one there in front of you doing something. He says something like 'I want everything that happens to be happening in the present.' I'm probably not explaining this very well and I know people find his plotting unconvincing, but for me it perfectly explains why his scripts have such an energy to their pacing.