NotTheGuyYouKill
Member
MY EMOTIONS. MY EMOTIONS!
Oh god the feels.
![]()
I got you bro... I got you.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1368a/1368a77de076c8c2fbc576b7b523844db581e3d7" alt="banner2226pyev.gif"
Oh god the feels.
![]()
Oh god the feels.
http://www.quiteunlikely.net/starlitblue/amyjwilliams.png[IMG][/QUOTE]
Is this official? If so...OH GOD SO MUCH FEELS.
If not? OH GOD SO MUCH FEELS.
Agreed. He's been better with keeping it subtle. RTD was screaming from the mountain tops.
I wanted to see the gay Anglican marines again.
Shame one of them got his head lopped off.
RTD: "THIS CHARACTER IS GAY, AND THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH THAT, SO YOU'RE JUST GOING TO HAVE TO DEAL WITH IT!"
Everyone else: "OK, that's cool, it doesn't bother me in the slightest."
RTD: "WELL TOUGH, YOU'LL JUST HAVE TO GET USED TO IT."
Not to say RTD didn't make it over the top, but from I remember of Outpost Gallifrey (or whatever it was bloody called then) in 2005 a lot of people were very upset that RTD's Gay Agenda (tm) was trying to make homosexuality look like 'normal people' instead of, presumably, depraved sex addicts trying to undermine British values by daring to exist or something. There was a large streak of Daily Mail conservatism, I fear, and probably still is.
Just to make it clear, I had no issues with it, but that doesn't take away from the fact that it was about as subtle as a sledgehammer to the face.
Would be nuts seeing River and Brian interacting.
"Oh hello, who are you?"
"Hello, grandad."
Oh god the feels.
![]()
I do love all the future religion stuff in "Good Man"/"Wedding", although they need to explain better who's actually aligned with the Silence.
I feel like a lot of the Silence and their organization and plans is still unexplained...but I'm not compelled at all to look it up.
Are we talking about Torchwood here? I just rewatched Utopia last night and Jack was hitting on everyone male and female
That's just Barrowman, man was spending way too much time on those musical talent shows
Oh god the feels.
![]()
Good, because I'm pretty sure there's nothing to look up yet. The Silence are the organisation who exist to kill the Doctor and ensure that when the Question is asked, silence will fall.. They're led by the creepy hypnotic alien dudes and Kovarian. That's literally all there is to it at the moment.
I sure hope this series gives us some more answers.
Hints, but I'm sure it's something that won't be wrapped up until Smith's eventual exit.
"Oh look a lesbian couple"
"Oh look, Canton is marrying a man"
"Oh, Oswin made reference to being bisexual"
We understand Moffat. We truly do. But please stahp.
It was more Miracle Day for me. In Miracle Day he only really made passes at Gwen of the women. I mean, it wasn't a HUGE deal to me, it was just something I found unusual, because I thought that was part of his character.
Oh no gay people! Keep them away! Just by existing they're ruining the show!
Oh that's not what I said at all and you know it. As someone mentioned before, there have been way too many scenes with.
"I'LL ESCORT YOU AND YOUR FRIEND OUT OF HERE"
"ACTUALLY HE'S MY HUSBAND"
"OH WELL THAT'S OKAY"
"I KNOW IT'S OKAY"
"GOOD" *stares into camera*
Could you possibly give an example of such a scene? I don't remember anything resembling this.Oh that's not what I said at all and you know it. As someone mentioned before, there have been way too many scenes with.
"I'LL ESCORT YOU AND YOUR FRIEND OUT OF HERE"
"ACTUALLY HE'S MY HUSBAND"
"OH WELL THAT'S OKAY"
"I KNOW IT'S OKAY"
"GOOD" *stares into camera*
Could you possibly give an example of such a scene? I don't remember anything resembling this.
Jack's introduction. That was horribly overdone, and I LOVE Jack as a character, but there was a scene in that two-parter that was just frustrating.
So long as I get to whine about all the times anybody mentions their heterosexual relationship...
Maybe it was a larger problem in the RTD days, but I've barely even noticed it in Moffat.
Maybe the absolutely hilarious joke about tongues in Demon's Run.
Maybe it was a larger problem in the RTD days, but I've barely even noticed it in Moffat.
Maybe the absolutely hilarious joke about tongues in Demon's Run.
Agreed. In my eyes it's just gay/bi relationships and references being used under the same umbrella as heterosexual ones (which is optimal), so sometimes it will be good, sometimes it won't. It depends on the writing in the same way.I will say this: As an American watching Doctor Who, it's actually refreshing to see all the GTLB bits in Doctor Who, because its treated as totally normal and not a huge fucking deal, special episode worthy. 90% of the time it's totally casual and just...normal. The woman Sky in Midnight, for example, the fact that she was married to a woman was not pointed out and focused on, just mentioned in casual conversation.
You don't see stuff like that on American TV. Anytime anyone is gay, it's treated as either a Special Episode, or is the basis for the entire show, or their entire character is about them being gay. Cause apparently gay people aren't normal? I don't know.
So yeah, the gay references in Doctor Who don't bother me at all.
Actually, I think it's just people are so used to heterosexual relationships and their references in media that they naturally don't notice it as much. A non-heterosexual reference stands out more whether it's good or "bad" because it's more unusual and unexpected. It's more memorable because it doesn't happen as much.
That can be the only explanation for why people make a point to highlight any gay reference as an agenda and completely ignore the 2.5 series of heterosexual Pond and DoctorxRiver drama alone.
Oh that's not what I said at all and you know it. As someone mentioned before, there have been way too many scenes with.
"I'LL ESCORT YOU AND YOUR FRIEND OUT OF HERE"
"ACTUALLY HE'S MY HUSBAND"
"OH WELL THAT'S OKAY"
"I KNOW IT'S OKAY"
"GOOD" *stares into camera*
I think you missed my distinction between "side" and "main." Obviously we notice MAIN relationships regardless. But somehow characters who are on screen for very little time manage to make it known the are homosexual, but heteros don't.
Because if they didn't you wouldn't know either way, mainly because people are assumed to be straight unless told otherwise due to our hetero-normative society.
Also what about the point Fuu raise about Oswin? She is supposedly a main character who showed overt heterosexual and homosexual characteristics in a way where you couldn't be entirely sure if she was being serious or joking.
It seems to be the solution we need is a homosexual main character, but then people will probably stop bitching about it being bad background references and instead the "gay agenda" taking over the whole show. I think that this is why gay references tend to get put to the side because the producers don't want to get accused of overtly pushing homosexuality on people and turning off watchers.
Do you believe that straight characters do not express their sexuality in the same way gay ones do?Well there's the issue. Side characters NEED to be pointed out as gay. So just don't specify. Who cares what people assume about them. They're side characters. The reason they probably assume they aren't gay is because statistically MOST people aren't gay. I also assume they don't fly model airplanes. That doesn't mean I'd think less of them if the story naturally revealed that they did fly model airplanes.
People bitching about a main character being gay would be stupid. Jack was bi, and it fit very well with his character when people weren't doing random exposition about Jack liking guys. When it was just him hitting on everything that moved it worked PERFECTLY. Do more of that, and less talking about people being gay.
I think you're completely missing his point. Especially in the second quote where he seems to be saying that Jack was fine when he was shown behaving a certain way (in this case bi), not talking about it.Do you believe that straight characters do not express their sexuality in the same way gay ones do?
So you're okay with people being bi, but not being gay? That's what you seem to be saying here.
Do you believe that straight characters do not express their sexuality in the same way gay ones do?
So you're okay with people being bi, but not being gay? That's what you seem to be saying here.
I think you're completely missing his point. Especially in the second quote where he seems to be saying that Jack was fine when he was shown behaving a certain way (in this case bi), not talking about it.