Such a shame about Last Night, ugh.
I missed it, what is the issue with it?
Edit: Oh, found the tweets. What a sad, little man.
http://m.neogaf.com/showthread.php?t=1389528What are you guys talking about? Trying to find, but can't.
http://m.neogaf.com/showthread.php?t=1389528
Just work your way through this thread and you'll get there
Such a shame about Last Night, ugh.
its so nasty and shameful. I hope the allies don't give it the time of day. The guy is backtracking after the Microsoft publishing woman tweeted at him but I don't believe it at all. His attempt at PR
He realized his future is in jeopardy. His true feelings are already out there, it is clear where he actually stands, MS shouldn't let him try and "make good" after his remarks.
Dragging politics into community threads, always a great idea!
Huber getting upset over the Devolver 'conference' somehow managed to make it even more entertaining. Strange reaction.
http://m.neogaf.com/showthread.php?t=1389528
Just work your way through this thread and you'll get there
I think I was out the country when all this gamergate stuff went down... I have very little idea of what it's about, two things though-
1) Damn, all those people turn on him/the game very quickly. I don't think he's making it solo so it's kind of unfortunate that the rest of the dev team is dragged down by it. Whatever GG is people feel very passionately about it.
2) the question of seperating the art from the artist is an interesting one. I don't buy Phil fish games because I think he's a tool
In this case he's not separating his art from his ideology.
A game literally made in response to gamergate to fight back against women. I'm appalled and saddened
Bethesda coverage is partially muted. I hope the Allies have a local recording, but I'd be surprised if they did.
Oh, that hadn't appeared on my sub page yet when I checked before posting. And it's not muted. Nice!It's up on youtube now.
French Translations: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?p=240232576#post240232576
This man is dirty.
I think you should read up about on it regardless as it was an rather important aspect of the industry back then and the effects can still be felt, but in general just as advice, probably never post in another GAF thread about "What is GG REALLY about?" in 2017, it's not a good look on here lol. (I mean this genuinely, no point to further this here, just thought you should know! =) )I think I was out the country when all this gamergate stuff went down... I have very little idea of what it's about, two things though-
1) Damn, all those people turn on him/the game very quickly. I don't think he's making it solo so it's kind of unfortunate that the rest of the dev team is dragged down by it. Whatever GG is people feel very passionately about it.
2) the question of seperating the art from the artist is an interesting one. I don't buy Phil fish games because I think he's a tool
I think you should read up about on it regardless as it was an rather important aspect of the industry back then and the effects can still be felt, but in general just as advice, probably never post in another GAF thread about "What is GG REALLY about?" in 2017, it's not a good look on here lol. (I mean this genuinely, no point to further this here, just thought you should know! =) )
Now Ubi, Sony and Nintendo are left - the real meat of the show. The first half kinda moved very slowly. Having E3 conferences dragged out over so many days blows to be honest. Well, anyway, coolcoolcool! =)
Edit: I was a bit tuned out yesterday at the end there, do I remember correctly, that Ian moderates today?
Okay, so probably? Awesome. We need some Rainy Day Ian right now!Not sure. I know he mentioned he was going to take notes of last year's PC Gaming Show when he got home, so maybe?
Any idea when Judge Jones will be on Youtube?
I think I was out the country when all this gamergate stuff went down... I have very little idea of what it's about, two things though-
1) Damn, all those people turn on him/the game very quickly. I don't think he's making it solo so it's kind of unfortunate that the rest of the dev team is dragged down by it. Whatever GG is people feel very passionately about it.
2) the question of seperating the art from the artist is an interesting one. I don't buy Phil fish games because I think he's a tool
Why that bring that shit into this thread? The kid's scum and there's a whole thread about it, not sure what it has to do with EZA
Why? What's with the anti information stance. It's baffling seeing people moan at BBoy now in two different places cause he was only providing more information as in relation to people talking the last night. Nobody made a judgement on anyone. It's not his fault that the creator is an ugly person(at least from my moral perspective). I'm also engaging here cause you generally seem to have your heart in the right place(as in I might not agree with the reaction you've had to things so far but at least I empathize strongly from where they come from) but I won't lie I was also almost just about to be snide and just celebrating this valuable contribution coming from someone that has sworn off this thread a couple of times now. In this case though I find it questionable for people to be against information spreading as it pertains to the last night. It comes off as a misguided wish to keep this place happy and rainbows.Take that GG stuff to the GG thread, ugh
This new DB fighter z footage. My god it's amazing. I can't wait to enter Ben's dojo with this game
ugh can't we just take politics out of EZA threads?
we youtube comments now
From a non American point of view what about it is politics? To me it seems simply morals nothing political about that, like what's the radical political agenda here?
I'm not supporting this cause the creator seems to have views that I find morally unacceptable with them being not in tune with equality, I don't feel like that's political at all. But not like this post surprises me in the least.
ugh can't we just take politics out of EZA threads?
we youtube comments now
It would be much better but I place a good portion of the failings on marvel and their short sided MCU roster pushNow lets take a moment to imagine a world where Arc System Works made a Marvel fighter instead of Capcoms artwork....
It would be much better but I place a good portion of the failings on marvel and their short sided MCU roster push
Take that GG stuff to the GG thread, ugh
Thanks for the updateIf you want to talk about something else, you should bring up a subject instead of complaining about the current one
To some of us a game specifically made about a developer's hatred of women being presented on the Microsoft stage is a big deal, and some people here have benefited from the conversation
In any case, the Allies are aware of it, for anyone concerned who was wondering
I see sorry for not picking up on that.my comment is firmly tongue in cheek btw
I still would love an answer to this.
The case from my perspective is very simple creator doesn't support equality and seems to use his game as a platform for hate.
It brings the moral question of whether it's ok to support him and I personally think this is up to each person personally. To me there isn't really anything political about it. But I admit this seems to be a disconnect that pops up for me especially in American centric contexts frequently where "morals" seem to be politicized whatever that means.
I'm a bit weirded out at the dismissiveness the topic is met. I don't see how people have engaged so far as it would earn the association to youtube comments.
It really looks like "oh no this topic is not pretty everyone shut this down" and that's the reaction to other people simply sharing information without judgment....
Yup they did it last year during the palmer luckey stuff and had a good panel to discuss itI'm pretty sure they've done a Frame Trap/Pocast email question on "separating art and the artist" quite recently too.
Yup they did it last year during the palmer luckey stuff and had a good panel to discuss it
If you want to talk about something else, you should bring up a subject instead of complaining about the current one
Ah yea that was a L&R question a couple weeks ago. That was more the publisher treated his dev fans poorly but another game seemed to be treated well and do well and didn't know if he should ruin others fun. That seemed less political and more about poor business dealings to meI distinctly remember that episode as it's my favourite (Honestly, the answers you can get out of Ian if you just push past the initial "Ugh" reply).
However, I think there was an even more recent one about a upcoming game that someone knew something about a person making it that made them uncomfortable purchasing. The discussion was only 5-10 minutes though unlike the lengthy Palmer Luckey one.