onadesertedisland
Member
Both logos suck. eBay has always been ugly. Making it pretty might be bad.
I am convinced you can find a design where the letters aren't all perfectly allined. It doesn't have to be in the exact pattern of the old logo though, because that does indeed look like a kids store logo.![]()
The odd placement of the letters makes it look unprofessional.
Ebay are trying to look more up market. The colours and similar font are enough to keep brand recognition and keep it modern. The design is good and fit for purpose. As others have said the designers would of had loads of other wacky and probably better locking logos but they don't get to choose what the higher ups decide, and better looking doesn't mean better for the company. It's a good design all things considered.
And this would have been part of the weeks of team effort a group of designers and branding people would of gone through =PI am convinced you can find a design where the letters aren't all perfectly allined. It doesn't have to be in the exact pattern of the old logo though, because that does indeed look like a kids store logo.
I just don't like the lazy LowerCaseHelvetica (tm) approach.
good design is dead these days
It doesn't even say eBay any more, it's just ebay. Horrible redesign.
Oh wow, I love thisThose tangents look awful they could have easily kept the overlapping nature but the modern look at the same time with something along the lines of this:
![]()
Those tangents look awful they could have easily kept the overlapping nature but the modern look at the same time with something along the lines of this:
![]()
Those tangents look awful they could have easily kept the overlapping nature but the modern look at the same time with something along the lines of this:
![]()
That works beautifully, especially at a smaller logo size =] The e being cut off looks a bit weird to me, but i suspect it overlapping the b looks worse and breaks the overlapping flow, unless you reverse the order.
But still a good concept that shows how to fit in more of the original logo's style while still keeping it modern =]
This looks more ordered, but do you notice it has a different vibe from the one they went with? Theirs feels funkier, which isn't to say it is better or worse—but it expresses a different idea than your version.
Those tangents look awful they could have easily kept the overlapping nature but the modern look at the same time with something along the lines of this:
http://i.imgur.com/XpWrf.png[IMG][/QUOTE]
You forgot to stroke the top of the "a".
Feel bad about it and mean it.
You forgot to stroke the top of the "a".
Feel bad about it and mean it.
I did that on purpose bro. The cut from the a looks like ass.
That's why you should feel bad, inconsistent.
Graphic Design is so stupid. Can't believe I'm doing this mess.
give me the $10,000
![]()
Hay guyz eBay's new logo isn't modern enough so I designed them a new one.
![]()
Saved in .jpg format for texture.
I don't get funky from the new one. I just think "someone got paid money to either not track or kern them in that close, gross."
Do you agree though that it helps design culture when someone big tries something like that? Something that's not supposed to work.
I personally wouldn't have gravitated in that direction either, but I have to admit it doesn't look as bad as I would've imagined it. BAD tight kerning grabs my eye right away, it feels claustrophobic. But this oneat a glance I just feel something cockeyed about it, and it takes me just a whisper longer to identify that it's the kerning. Not ages or anything, you knowjust a quick beat before I identify the 'problem'.
I think it's because of the specific geometry of the letterforms in this particular typeface. The forms themselves are so roomy that there was room to play with the space between them a little more than usual.
Those tangents look awful they could have easily kept the overlapping nature but the modern look at the same time with something along the lines of this:
![]()
Hideous, the original is superior. The border around the letters causing the cutout effect just make it look insanely cheap.
Sorry, but I'm gonna have to take that money from you.
![]()
That is incredibly ignorant and condescending.
I think it just keeps making them look kiddish and disjointed when you combine the colors and the close in kerning. They're less of a jumbled mess than they used to be and the new logo doesn't really reflect that. Trying something new doesn't mean making a logo aesthetically ugly just because it garners attention. Makes it no better than shock art in terms of depth. I don't know how the designers justified their choices but the best branding to me sends a message and looks good. Eyesores are just eyesores and most people won't understand. But plenty of people understand basic graphic design rules even if they don't know them, and tangents is one of them.
I think the cheap look is intentional. ebay isn't exactly a bastion of high class wares.
It's an online flea market. If they clean up their look and try to look slightly more up sclae they'll lose people.
So boring... I wish more companies would come up with clever logos, rather than just spelling out the word.
Those tangents look awful they could have easily kept the overlapping nature but the modern look at the same time with something along the lines of this:
![]()
What douchebag actually dresses like this?
Helvetica everywhere.