Ebay redesigns its logo after 10 years

Status
Not open for further replies.
4UHZt.png


The odd placement of the letters makes it look unprofessional.

Ebay are trying to look more up market. The colours and similar font are enough to keep brand recognition and keep it modern. The design is good and fit for purpose. As others have said the designers would of had loads of other wacky and probably better locking logos but they don't get to choose what the higher ups decide, and better looking doesn't mean better for the company. It's a good design all things considered.
I am convinced you can find a design where the letters aren't all perfectly allined. It doesn't have to be in the exact pattern of the old logo though, because that does indeed look like a kids store logo.

I just don't like the lazy LowerCaseHelvetica (tm) approach.
 
I am convinced you can find a design where the letters aren't all perfectly allined. It doesn't have to be in the exact pattern of the old logo though, because that does indeed look like a kids store logo.

I just don't like the lazy LowerCaseHelvetica (tm) approach.
And this would have been part of the weeks of team effort a group of designers and branding people would of gone through =P

It's just the fashion atm. It's not lazy just because its popular and everyone else is doing it, to use a bad analogy, bar any legal requirements, we don't say people that design cars with only 2 headlights are lazy. Other trends will come and go, I'm personally hoping for an abstract ultra minimal trend to come along.
 
Reminds me of the new Rare logo, what's with everything having to be a logo of the name in a simple font with all lower case letters? I want my caps back!
 
It doesn't even say eBay any more, it's just ebay. Horrible redesign.

Umm, I might be crazy but the old logo said ebaY not eBay. Now the new logo says ebay, which is how we say it, we don't over empathise the 'B'. Words evolve in many ways all the time. For example, Electronic Mail > E-Mail > Email > email.
 
Those tangents look awful they could have easily kept the overlapping nature but the modern look at the same time with something along the lines of this:

XpWrf.png
 
MUCH better
Those tangents look awful they could have easily kept the overlapping nature but the modern look at the same time with something along the lines of this:

XpWrf.png
Oh wow, I love this
 
Those tangents look awful they could have easily kept the overlapping nature but the modern look at the same time with something along the lines of this:

XpWrf.png

This looks more ordered, but do you notice it has a different vibe from the one they went with? Theirs feels funkier, which isn't to say it is better or worse—but it expresses a different idea than your version.
 
Those tangents look awful they could have easily kept the overlapping nature but the modern look at the same time with something along the lines of this:

XpWrf.png

That works beautifully, especially at a smaller logo size =] The e being cut off looks a bit weird to me, but i suspect it overlapping the b looks worse and breaks the overlapping flow, unless you reverse the order.

But still a really good concept that shows how to fit in more of the original logo's style while still keeping it modern =]
 
That works beautifully, especially at a smaller logo size =] The e being cut off looks a bit weird to me, but i suspect it overlapping the b looks worse and breaks the overlapping flow, unless you reverse the order.

But still a good concept that shows how to fit in more of the original logo's style while still keeping it modern =]

Yeah I'm not sold on the e (the other way looks gross) but this was done in like 30 min and I still find it much better than the tangent mess that is the new one.



This looks more ordered, but do you notice it has a different vibe from the one they went with? Theirs feels funkier, which isn't to say it is better or worse—but it expresses a different idea than your version.

I don't get funky from the new one. I just think "someone got paid money to either not track or kern them in that close, gross."
 
Those tangents look awful they could have easily kept the overlapping nature but the modern look at the same time with something along the lines of this:

http://i.imgur.com/XpWrf.png[IMG][/QUOTE]

You forgot to stroke the top of the "a".

Feel bad about it and mean it.
 
I don't get funky from the new one. I just think "someone got paid money to either not track or kern them in that close, gross."

Do you agree though that it helps design culture when someone big tries something like that? Something that's not supposed to work.

I personally wouldn't have gravitated in that direction either, but I have to admit it doesn't look as bad as I would've imagined it. BAD tight kerning grabs my eye right away, it feels claustrophobic. But this one—at a glance I just feel something cockeyed about it, and it takes me just a whisper longer to identify that it's the kerning. Not ages or anything, you know—just a quick beat before I identify the 'problem'.

I think it's because of the specific geometry of the letterforms in this particular typeface. The forms themselves are so roomy that there was room to play with the space between them a little more than usual.
 
Do you agree though that it helps design culture when someone big tries something like that? Something that's not supposed to work.

I personally wouldn't have gravitated in that direction either, but I have to admit it doesn't look as bad as I would've imagined it. BAD tight kerning grabs my eye right away, it feels claustrophobic. But this one—at a glance I just feel something cockeyed about it, and it takes me just a whisper longer to identify that it's the kerning. Not ages or anything, you know—just a quick beat before I identify the 'problem'.

I think it's because of the specific geometry of the letterforms in this particular typeface. The forms themselves are so roomy that there was room to play with the space between them a little more than usual.

I think it just keeps making them look kiddish and disjointed when you combine the colors and the close in kerning. They're less of a jumbled mess than they used to be and the new logo doesn't really reflect that. Trying something new doesn't mean making a logo aesthetically ugly just because it garners attention. Makes it no better than shock art in terms of depth. I don't know how the designers justified their choices but the best branding to me sends a message and looks good. Eyesores are just eyesores and most people won't understand. But plenty of people understand basic graphic design rules even if they don't know them, and tangents is one of them.
 
Those tangents look awful they could have easily kept the overlapping nature but the modern look at the same time with something along the lines of this:

XpWrf.png

Hideous, the original is superior. The border around the letters causing the cutout effect just make it look insanely cheap.
 
I expected them to just copy Amazon's logo considering how much they try to be like Amazon these days (to the complete ruination of the site I might add).
 
always gives me a chuckle when people equate creating a logo = just technical feasibility. It's much much more than that.

anyways, ebay logo is alright, good communication, delivered as promised, B++++, would deal with again.
 
I think it just keeps making them look kiddish and disjointed when you combine the colors and the close in kerning. They're less of a jumbled mess than they used to be and the new logo doesn't really reflect that. Trying something new doesn't mean making a logo aesthetically ugly just because it garners attention. Makes it no better than shock art in terms of depth. I don't know how the designers justified their choices but the best branding to me sends a message and looks good. Eyesores are just eyesores and most people won't understand. But plenty of people understand basic graphic design rules even if they don't know them, and tangents is one of them.

I think the cheap look is intentional. ebay isn't exactly a bastion of high class wares.

It's an online flea market. If they clean up their look and try to look slightly more up sclae they'll lose people.
 
So boring... I wish more companies would come up with clever logos, rather than just spelling out the word.
 
I think the cheap look is intentional. ebay isn't exactly a bastion of high class wares.

It's an online flea market. If they clean up their look and try to look slightly more up sclae they'll lose people.

Doubt it. They're the best game in town.


So boring... I wish more companies would come up with clever logos, rather than just spelling out the word.

Yeah unfortunately a lot of branding is pretty one-dimensional like that.
 
While I am getting tired of the trend of corporate rebrands with simplistic fonts in lower case, I don't think this eBay rebrand is some sort of crime.
 
New one tried to boil it down to "iconic" but there was really nothing iconic about the old logo. It's recognizable for its transparency and overlapping, along with the colors. New one looks terrible over white, okay over black. Wasted effort really, very arbitrary and potentially negative change.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom