I think the controller will have a screen if only for Amiibos. Nintendo isn't going to let that cash cow die.
Why would that require a screen?
I think the controller will have a screen if only for Amiibos. Nintendo isn't going to let that cash cow die.
We have yet to see if this changed anything related to their inability to provide enough Software for this Hardware transition and beyond the launch.How does it sound like that
Really? Never heard anything about the company restructuring in Japan? The console and handheld divisions being unified. There were plenty of things we heard. Whether you listened or not is a whole other thing.
That has been debunked in the last thread, iirc.It's going to be more powerful then PS4 by a noticeable margin,
sounds like pure fangirl nonsense.
While I can easily believe that Nintendo is taking steps to improve their output rate, and unifying the handheld/console development will help to some extent (the handheld teams are generally smaller though and NX will need higher production values than WiiU), thinking they'll match Wii Us entire library in one years is just silly. Unless they're going to just release tiny games with rehashed content from now on.
I hope AC Wii U, Zelda Triforce Heroes and Chibi Robo 3DS are not indicative of what to expect from the "shorter development cycles".
Why would that require a screen?
thinking they'll match Wii Us entire library in one years is just silly. Unless they're going to just release tiny games with rehashed content from now on.
We are all crazy for new NX info. NeoGaf will explode after next week's investor's meeting and the E3 digital event or whatever they do.
Just imagine if in the first year of NX we get Zelda, Splatoon/Smash port, a real 3D Mario, the new Retro Studio game plus some surprises then yes, I really can believe her.
If the Wii U had that amazing library, it wouldn't be the worst selling console.
I think she was talking about third parties too. Maybe she heard about a couple of big third parties projects coming to the platform (e.g. FFXV and the new Red Dead) and she went full hyperbolic about that part.Well WiiU had all of that (or will have in the case of Zelda if it's released in novemeber) and a lot more in its first four years, and Smash/Splatoon weren't ports; so that still wouldn't be nearly enough to make her hyperbolic statement true
I hope AC Wii U, Zelda Triforce Heroes and Chibi Robo 3DS are not indicative of what to expect from the "shorter development cycles".
There is absolutely nothing wrong with Chibi Robo 3DS. The other games are garbage, though.
Make smaller games? It's not like Nintendo rapidly expanded their development teams.
Someone enlighten me, if the NX is as powerful or more powerful than the PS4 how can the console and handheld share the same library of games if the console is so much more powerful? Does that mean that the console version of games will be grounded because of the power difference between the console and handheld?
They'd be stupid to not port Wii U games if NX is a success. You should instead hope the effort to port is minimal and/or outsourced.Here's hoping the rumors of Wii U ports turn out to be false.
I hope games are playable across both the handheld and console. It really is the best thing for Nintendo - they just can't support two platforms on their own.
Thanks. I am just wondering because the console version would be tied to the handheld version, which means that the console would not be used at full power to make larger levels for instance, more enemies, better AI etc. It means the games on console would be compromised so the handheld can play the shared library. Would that be correct?Think of it as the handheld game being a low-end iPhone while the console is an iPad. The software is compatible on both devices but the features, graphics, performance, and such is considerably better on the latter.
Hmm, I don't think we should look at it this way.the required extra software output/variety, will not show before MK9 is actually released + another 2 years of development.
Make smaller games? It's not like Nintendo rapidly expanded their development teams.
My statement about more wrong than right still stands. I'll let you all cook though.
Come on man, this isnt true.
Smash Bros.
Bayonetta 2
Pilot Wings Resort
Style Savvy Trendsetters
Wii Fit U
Devil's 3rd
The Wonderful 101
Mario & Luigi Dream Team
Multiple Art Academy games
Kid Icarus: Uprising
Both Star Fox games
...just to name a few.
More first party software is a plus, but i hope it doesn't mean there will be a drop in quality over quantity.
I can see 1-2 first party nintendo games being released every month after initial launch or so would seem plausible, the wii u for example only has star fox zero releasing in April, and absolutely no 1st party games in may, june has 2 nintendo games ( tokyo mirage sessions and mario & sonic), but then after that we have absolutely no idea how barren the wii u software output will be from july to the end of this year.
Wonderful.
I don't know about anybody else but I only buy Nintendo consoles for their first-party software so if they have that I'm good. Now if they have great third-party software as well I'll be even happier. A win is a win for me, I just need that money to purchase these things given I'm going to be busy for later on this year.
Also, Emily said she wasn't improved with the Wii U's software which can be a good or bad thing I guess. I mean, did anyone really like the Wii U's games? I can see Smash, Mario Maker, Splatoon and 3D World, Bayonetta 2 and all but what else did it have?
I'm not expecting it to be 100% shared, but a fair bit of overlap wouldn't surprise me (especially if Nintendo plans on doubling their output as far as games go).
I hope the solution isn't just more budget titles. Maybe it's more spinoffs?
At the very least, the NX might get better third party support so there's that.
Not exactly. I'm of the belief that a good chunk of Nintendo's output will be shared across the next console & the next handheld. I'm not expecting there to be just a single Nintendo device, be it just a home console, handheld, or the mythical hybrid device that some of GAF has a hard-on for. Iwata ruled out a hybrid before he died, most of the talk from Nintendo (& Trev) indicates that the Wii U successor will be out the door first, & Nintendo's handheld market is currently their most successful market. What I believe, based on Nintendo unifying their console & handheld teams as well as Iwata wanting the console & handheld to be "like brothers", is that a good chunk of Nintendo's games will be shared across both the NX Console & NX Handheld (though not all of them, some being console-only due to power & whatnot).
Not surprised a lot of Wii U titles moved over to the NX and I'm willing to bet the following was moved over:
-Next Level Game's Rumored Wii U Project
-Monster Game's Diddy Kong Racing 2
-Retro Studios New IP/Metrod Project
-Animal Crossing Wii U (mainline title)
Exactly. Nintendo's software output combined is actually rather amazing, it's just that their focus is split between supporting two separate platforms. Together (or mostly together) would result in Nintendo rapid-firing first party games like a Heavy Splatling with unlimited ink.
I'll give you those. The rest are either first party or second party games,
I even mentioned in my post that Wii Fit U doesn't count - Ganbarion "helping" with development resources isn't the same thing as Nintendo working with Cing on, say, Hotel Dusk.
The circumstances behind Devil's Third are different too, that's basically Nintendo picking up an exclusive, Nintendo wasn't involved in that title's conception. But I bolded it at a push.
It's not crazy to think Retro Studio will release at least 2 games on NX, they only ever released Donkey Kong this gen so whatever they have been working on since late 2013 was obviously moved to NX.
That has been debunked in the last thread, iirc.
Still rumored to be a bit stronger than the PS4.
I'll give you those in bold type. The rest are either first party or second party games,
I even mentioned in my post that Wii Fit U doesn't count - Ganbarion "helping" with development resources isn't the same thing as Nintendo working with Cing on, say, Hotel Dusk.
The circumstances behind Devil's Third are different too, that's basically Nintendo picking up an exclusive, Nintendo wasn't involved in that title's conception. But I bolded it at a push.
Why did you include Style Boutique and Art Academy but exclude Mario & Luigi?
Basically it would be like having the combined output of first/second party 3DS and WiiU, something like - I don't know - around 20 games per year? A very significant improvement IMHO.
The thing is Nintendo's involvement in several collaborative first-party projects vary. For Style Savvy, the female lead director and sound team come from Nintendo aside from the production team.
it depends on nintendo's release schedule. maybe in 2017 they can get a handheld that replaces 3ds, and is similar to a 2013 xb1, while the 2016 nx console has been on the market for a while.
the market for consoles is also strong in the us, stronger than the market for handhelds at least. it's true in europe too. why not go for different audiences if you have a large library. if the only thing holding you back is form factor, why not make that form factor available? nintendo already did this in some fashion with 2ds - it's like the 3ds, but with less features and a very low price of entry compared to almost every other dedicated handheld out there. it didn't light the market on fire, but it's been a consistent seller and introduced millions more to the 3ds userbase, which contributes to more software sold.
That has been debunked in the last thread, iirc.
Still rumored to be a bit stronger than the PS4.
On a single platform.But that's still make 20 different games.
can't wait for them to dump on metroid again with other M 2
at least zelda nx might be cool
It dangerously sounds like they're gonna ignore third parties again.
If true.