So.
Can anyone explain me how the third place rule works ? The best team on a third place is not out, just like in the euro qualifying?
So.
Can anyone explain me how the third place rule works ? The best team on a third place is not out, just like in the euro qualifying?
The four best third-placed teams are determined according to the following criteria:[44]
Higher number of points obtained;
Superior goal difference;
Higher number of goals scored;
Fair play conduct;
Position in the UEFA national team coefficient ranking system.
Christ.4 of the 6 best 3rd placed teams advance to the knock out stage.
So.
Can anyone explain me how the third place rule works ? The best team on a third place is not out, just like in the euro qualifying?
4 of the 6 best 3rd placed teams advance to the knock out stage.
After some fearmongering, this is nice to see (Croatian and Turkish fans):
https://twitter.com/Floaijan/status/741919679736905729
https://mobile.twitter.com/JonasMagnussons/status/741922365521723392/video/1
(Swedish and Irish fans)
England 1-1 Russia
England 1-1 Russia
England football team in a nutshell, lol. Also i love the title.
Russias sports minister, Vitaly Mutko, has backed Uefas decision to take action against the Russian Football Union. Its the right thing, there were flares, there was a flare gun, there had been clashes in the stands, its necessary to sort all of this out, said Mutko, speaking to the R-Sport news agency. We will prepare properly, we will present our position... the fans were rooting greatly, but there are people who do not come for the football. The former Fifa vice-president, Vyacheslav Koloskov, has said the RFU can expect to receive a maximum fine for their supporters behaviour.
From the few games we've seen so far, I've noticed that the better teams haven't been playing narrow enough. England relied to heavily on Sterling doing something last night. France were relying on crosses into the box. I thought Switzerland even when Albania were down to 10 weren't aggressive enough.Wait, THIS is how it happened?
Oh my goodness.
So far none of the teams have got my attention. I am hoping Belgium, Italy, Spain and Portugal can up the quality because so far this is quite an embarrassing first few matches into the European Championship.
Well it's not like first matches are usually all that good
Well it's not like first matches are usually all that good
I saw that... and it was a very conspicuousGerman TV just showed exclusive footage of the Russian fans attacking the English inside the stadium. One of the Russians was also recorded kicking an Englishman lying on the ground hours before the match. And yet he got into the stadium.
Plus weaker teams that wouldn't qualify before are now on this 24-team Euro, so expect more a few dull games until last 16 at least.
Well it's not like first matches are usually all that good
I blame the 24 countries setup the most. Countries like Swiss, Slowakia, Croatia, Turkey etc. just do not excite me as much.
Did you watch the game? Scoreline did not reflect the quality of the team. England got unlucky and Russia got lucky. I would be worried as either Wales or Slovakia coming forward. I've said previously in this thread that I see Wales winning but after watching Slovakia against Wales, I wouldn't be so sure they can beat England. Wales have the strength, pride and belief to pull it out of the bag though.Yeah, England especially start badly.
And then continue badly and finish badly.
Did you watch the game?
I blame the 24 countries setup the most. Countries like Swiss, Slowakia, Croatia, Turkey etc. just do not excite me as much.
you just named countries that would qualify anyway.
The last bit wasn't mostly aimed at you but the general thread. Posts here aren't context free and an en masse reply would be far too laborious.Yes. I was making a joke, although with an element of truth when you look at past championships. But still a joke that you seemed to take really seriously.
I'm from England, by the way.
Eh, how sure are we about Slovakia?
I blame the 24 countries setup the most. Countries like Swiss, Slowakia, Croatia, Turkey etc. just do not excite me as much.
The last bit wasn't mostly aimed at you but the general thread. Posts here aren't context free and an en masse reply would be far too laborious.
for the most part
Slovakia made the 2012 euros tho.
Roy is a cockwomble of the highest order.
Turkey was always very exciting. In 2002 they won third place in the world cup, in 2008 they lost against Germany in the semi final which was arguably the best game in the tournament.
You know anything is possible if Lahm scores.
It's such a stupid set-up. Either go with 32 or go with 16.
Ya, it's stupid - a perfect setup to justify 32 teams.
1960 - 4
1980 - 8
1996 - 16
2016 - 24
Money > Quality
By 2060 they will probably invite Australia to get to 64 teams.
First, I assure you that I didn't take it seriously, I just must not have conveyed myself properly.I know. But you still seemed to take it way too seriously.
Alexei Sayle did a great intro to one of his shows which was just him pissing himself at a mirror. He then turned to the camera and said "that's the thing about us Brits, we can laugh at ourselves".
I remember Italia 90, I remember Euro 96. I remember Mexico in 86 when we were put out by a cheating fuck. I know we're not always crap, but jokes aren't always based in reality.
What's with all the complains? There have been only 4 games played out of which maybe 1 was slightly boring but still quite contested. The number of teams has nothing to do with the quality of the games if we look back at the championship won by Greece.
And in the end nobody forces you to watch Switzerland against Albania for example if that's not your cup of tea, it's not like it hurts you in any way that the game is played.
The irony in this game. Turkey won most of their games last minute, and then germany just does that. I think back then, Turkey was actually the better team.