pyros said:they left us, left to wait 2 damn days
valeo said:Apparently it's exactly the same as Fallout 3 but in a different setting. So if you liked Fallout 3, you'll like NV...
The game--a retail disc running on a new-model Xbox 360--crashed on me about a dozen times over the 33 hours I spent playing, often taking a significant amount of progress with it. The load times and frame rate seemed to get randomly worse as I continued to play the game, with some simple scene transitions taking 20 seconds or more. The technical hurdles you'll have to make to stay interested in New Vegas are meaner and more frustrating than any Deathclaw or Nightkin you'll face in the game. If you're the type of person who likes to watch for a patch or two before settling into a game, know this now: you probably don't want to play Fallout: New Vegas right away.
Zzoram said:So it's Fallout 3.5, which is what it's always seemed to be, and is fine. People who liked Fallout 3 will like this, and it's been long enough for them to want this.
Zeliard said:These comments are a bit puzzling. What did people want when the engine is identical as well as the core gameplay? I'm going into this expecting much better writing and characterization, since Obsidian's writers are far more talented than Bethesda's, but I'm not expecting some completely different game (outside of stuff like Hardcore mode).
And Eurogamer just gave it a 9/10. Dan Whitehead, too, no less.
_tetsuo_ said:Runs much worse than I expected. I've got it maxed out at 1920x1200 and it hardly stays at 30fps =/
Papercuts said:Are any of the reviews even talking about Hardcore mode?
Dan Whitehead said:And you can put aside any concerns regarding the decision to hand over to Obsidian for development duties on this spin-off; while the studio stumbled with its fun-but-flawed espionage RPG, Alpha Protocol, there are enough former Black Isle people still roaming its halls to make New Vegas feel authentic, right down to the last detail. In fact, those who felt Fallout 3 deviated too far from the series' role-playing roots may even find they nod appreciatively at some of the deeper elements New Vegas reintroduces.
Ferrio said:Played past the tutorial now I'm thinking of redoing my character. Not sure... hrmmm. Last time I did a melee character, was doing unarmed this time... not sure if I really wanna do that again... kinda boring. Maybe a high intel char? hrmm
nismogrendel said:How good is your pc and how well did it run FO3 (if you played it)?
Ferrio said:Played past the tutorial now I'm thinking of redoing my character. Not sure... hrmmm. Last time I did a melee character, was doing unarmed this time... not sure if I really wanna do that again... kinda boring. Maybe a high intel char? hrmm
Ferrio said:Played past the tutorial now I'm thinking of redoing my character. Not sure... hrmmm. Last time I did a melee character, was doing unarmed this time... not sure if I really wanna do that again... kinda boring. Maybe a high intel char? hrmm
Darklord said:God, can't Obsidian just do a LITTLE polish for once? Won't bother picking this up now until later on when it's fully patched and cheaper.
Based on the reviews this doesn't seem to be the case.:/ however the role-playing aspects sound improved over FO3.Zeliard said:These comments are a bit puzzling. What did people want when the engine is identical as well as the core gameplay? I'm going into this expecting much better writing and characterization, since Obsidian's writers are far more talented than Bethesda's, but I'm not expecting some completely different game (outside of stuff like Hardcore mode).
Does it seem justified? Have the graphics been improved over Fallout 3?_tetsuo_ said:Runs much worse than I expected. I've got it maxed out at 1920x1200 and it hardly stays at 30fps =/
Lafiel said:Based on the reviews this doesn't seem to be the case.:/ however the role-playing aspects sound improved over FO3.
DennisK4 said:Does it seem justified? Have the graphics been improved over Fallout 3?
Do you have any AA on?
_tetsuo_ said:Computer is more than up to the task. GTX 480 OC'ed heavily, AMD 1090T hexcore at 4 ghz and 8 gigs of RAM. One of the settings is messing up the performance, and I'm going to find out which
HK-47 said:Zombie, did any of 3's mods help improve companion AI?
Also the card performance problem definitely sounds like something Obsidian needs to patch asap.
Gravijah said:Jesus Christ I thought you were Drkirby.
HK-47 said:Zombie, did any of 3's mods help improve companion AI or is Gamebryo just to decrepit?
Also the card performance problem definitely sounds like something Obsidian needs to patch asap.
gundamzeta209 said:i'm not going to blame obsidian for the gamebryo though. Besthesda needs to retire that piece of crap. AND THEY NEED TO RETIRE IT NOW!!
ZombieSupaStar said:eh to my knowledge not really, marts mutant mod might have improved npc ai a bit?
and ugh at performance
ive got a e6850 3ghz, 4 gigs ram, and 280gtx
im fucked lol :lol
i run fallout 3 at 1920x1080 with maxed (no aa though) and a high res texture replacement package all over 30 fps... i dont get it...
Zeliard said:Watch them bust that shit out for Elder Scrolls V. "Surprise, bitches!"
HK-47 said:Has anyone tried to fix it? Maybe with the command wheel, people will be more likely to focus on it.
Old engine plus open world? TBH, I think they should have just foregone companions in both 3 and NV.
ZombieSupaStar said:
The RPGfan review said the basic story is fairly unimpressive http://www.rpgfan.com/reviews/Fallout_New_Vegas/index.html. And some other reviews were fairly unenthusiastic about the story like GI. Although they don't go into detail about it much.Which ones? Haven't read any but Eurogamer and Giant Bomb's reviews. Gerstmann in the latter expressly stated that the writing is what kept him playing.
ZombieSupaStar said:
Zinga said:Gotta love the publishers treatment of Australia and other countries outside of the USA, US$90 for a digital copy of the game and it's 3 days late too!
Would any American pay $90 for a digital version of the game? luckily you can get it from AUD$40 from Ozgameshop
Played it for the last hour and a half or so. Really the only problem I ran into was minor performance issues, bit of stuttering and framerate noticeably dipping when I looked out into distances. Granted my video card is getting a little old now, but with the same settings I ran FO3 fine. Indoors stayed fairly consistent.WEGGLES said:Anyone on PC not having issues? :{
I'm hoping it's a vocal minority thing :{
Zeliard said:Watch them bust that shit out for Elder Scrolls V. "Surprise, bitches!"
Jubbly said:Do you remember the original engine they used for Oblivion? That had awesome lighting and far superior textures, but the consoles couldn't cope so they switched to the current POS Maybe when the next-gen occurs we can finally dump that crappy engine and get back to pushing the boundaries of technology.
JaseC said:There's a USD$40 Aussie Tax on the game; the US price is USD$50. Fucking ridiculous. :lol Valve and those who self-publish on Steam are about the only ones who don't practice this bullshit.
God dammit.ZombieSupaStar said: