Suspect of what? something some rando said? The burden of proof is on the accuser, you can't just haul someone in because of hearsay and then require them to prove their innocence.
They're basically commiting razzias though.Police can come to anyone's home to investigate a reported crime, but they still have to have a warrant to enter. How is that not the case in your country? If someone mistakenly reported me as an illegal alien then I can produce documents showing that's bullshit in a matter of seconds. I'm only going to get "hauled away" if I'm suspected of committing a crime, in this case being in the country illegally. If ICE or police have a warrant to enter your home then there is more here than simply what "some rando said".
They're basically commiting razzias though.
If someone mistakenly reported me as an illegal alien then I can produce documents showing that's bullshit in a matter of seconds.
None of this is relevant to the question I asked and the subsequent "yes" answers received.Police can come to anyone's home to investigate a reported crime, but they still have to have a warrant to enter. How is that not the case in your country? If someone mistakenly reported me as an illegal alien then I can produce documents showing that's bullshit in a matter of seconds. I'm only going to get "hauled away" if I'm suspected of committing a crime, in this case being in the country illegally. If ICE or police have a warrant to enter your home then there is more here than simply what "some rando said".
None of this is relevant to the question I asked and the subsequent "yes" answers received.
I've only asked one question, which several people have responded to, including you indirectly.What question? What crime are they suspected of? Entering the country illegally. Thought that was pretty obvious. What "yes" answers are you talking about?
I've only asked one question, which several people have responded to, including you indirectly.
I didn't make any assumptions, I asked a question and the answer was yes.So your question was answered and your incorrect assumptions addressed. Guess we are done.
Don’t all of that means the same thing though lol in the end I guess the words aren’t as harsh anymore? So you’re having a gripe with that? Confused really lolSomebody commits a crime, gets punished. Nobody would be shocked if they heard that. It's only because over the years people have been gaslighted into thinking entering a country illegally is not a crime. It used to be illegal immigrants, then it was undocumented immigrants and I just read today unauthorized persons.
If the guy is in the US illegally he is criminal, bro, he skipped the queue all legit imigrants have to go tru. And i say it as an european hereIf it's real (which I doubt) I hope the guys who reported him rot in hell, that's a disgusting thing to do.. (unless it's a criminal who harmed others)
I didn't make any assumptions, I asked a question and the answer was yes.
It's not an assumption because I suggested no such thing, what I said there was in line with my question, which I worded to be about no case in particular.Suggesting this is all due to what "some rando said" is an assumption
It's not an assumption because I suggested no such thing, what I said there was in line with my question, which I worded to be about no case in particular.
That's correct, so I dunno why you're bringing that up; as said my question was about no case in particular, which is what "some rando" refers to, and thus isn't about this case, as you are implying with saying that I'm "suggesting this is all due to...". I haven't suggested anything about this case, I asked a question in general and the answer was yes."guilty until proven innocent" was a statement, not a question
That's correct, so I dunno why you're bringing that up; as said my question was about no case in particular, which is what "some rando" refers to, and thus isn't about this case, as you are implying with saying that I'm "suggesting this is all due to...". I haven't suggested anything about this case, I asked a question in general and the answer was yes.
It's not bullshit if the answer to my question is yes.Because stating that "guilty until proven innocent" is "expected" in the US is just bullshit.
As much as I hate to say it but words have power as to why they come for language. Undocumented doesn't sound like a crime. It's sounds like you just forgot your passport. The reality is that they dumped their documents at the border so you can't find out who they are. Taking without consent doesn't sound as bad as stealing.Don’t all of that means the same thing though lol in the end I guess the words aren’t as harsh anymore? So you’re having a gripe with that? Confused really lol
Idk everyone around my city and town knows if you say undocumented we automatically assume you’re illegal and it’s a crime. Just because the word changes doesn’t mean it’s not the same thing (crime) unless people are this ignorant and have no idea how things work. That’s why I’m confused by what you’re saying lolAs much as I hate to say it but words have power as to why they come for language. Undocumented doesn't sound like a crime. It's sounds like you just forgot your passport. The reality is that they dumped their documents at the border so you can't find out who they are. Taking without consent doesn't sound as bad as stealing.
People wouldn't be changing the wording of things if it has no effect. It does. You underestimate the effect that it has on peoples perception of things. Why do you think people are so obsessed with the wording of gender and sex and everything else. You are arguing with human linguistic history. This is a well established psychological effect. They wouldn't be marking it sound less bad if literally had no effect. About 50% of the Politics spectrum would be completely wasting their time then.Idk everyone around my city and town knows if you say undocumented we automatically assume you’re illegal and it’s a crime. Just because the word changes doesn’t mean it’s not the same thing (crime) unless people are this ignorant and have no idea how things work. That’s why I’m confused by what you’re saying lol
You're mixing arrests with sentences. You can be arrested for random reasons like this, to be sentenced and made do prison time is when you need to be proven guilty.Suspect of what? something some rando said? The burden of proof is on the accuser, you can't just haul someone in because of hearsay and then require them to prove their innocence.
Written on papyrus with a quill... with a quill.Damn
Great, thanks for confirming.You can be arrested for random reasons like this
Written on papyrus with a quill... with a quill.
This permit only allows you to drive mammoths through the berings straitMy first drivers license...
![]()
Potato potato and as far as sex and gender that’s people getting brainwashed by woke nonsense outside of the internet I rarely encounter more then 5 of these people weekly. let me give you example gay and faggot means the same thing one just a little more derogatory I put it in the same boat, the only reason people switched to undocumented immigrants instead of illegal immigrants is to make people feel safer in my opinion.P
People wouldn't be changing the wording of things if it has no effect. It does. You underestimate the effect that it has on peoples perception of things. Why do you think people are so obsessed with the wording of gender and sex and everything else. You are arguing with human linguistic history. This is a well established psychological effect. They wouldn't be marking it sound less bad if literally had no effect. About 50% of the Politics spectrum would be completely wasting their time then.
LOOOOOOOOOL