Those benchmarks are at max settings though right?
right. The game looks good but I'll wait for a new card.
Those benchmarks are at max settings though right?
Summary: it doesn't run great at max. Minimum of a 570 to get 1080p, maxed, without AA at 30fps.
Woah, this must've really come around since the previews. I was really skeptical on it because of the poor co-op showing at E3, but it really seems to have gotten way better.
Will give it a shot during the holiday sale.
And this is my one big beef with PC gaming.
Why do I feel this is one of those games where you can tone down the over blown SSAO a notch for no noticeable visual difference and gain ~10 frames.
This is EXACTLY my setup.
I imagine we will be the recomended specs and above. So we'll be just fine.
This is EXACTLY my setup.So that benchmarking write up is quite confusing.
What kind of performance can I expect with a i5-3670K, 8 gig ram, GTX670?
Why do I feel this is one of those games where you can tone down the over blown SSAO a notch for no noticeable visual difference and gain ~10 frames.
Why do I feel this is one of those games where you can tone down the over blown SSAO a notch for no noticeable visual difference and gain ~10 frames.
FYI, there's a tab to read the review, and you can hit the download button if you want to watch in full quality.
Same here, and it pretty much devours most modern PC games sans Metro 2033 and Batman Arkham City.This is also my exact setup, haha. My 670 is a FTW though.
Can anyone comment on the damage model in Far Cry 3?
Far Cry 2 gave you the option to "wound" enemies. Example: Shoot a guy in the leg and he screams out to his buddies for help.
Is this still in Far Cry 3?
Can anyone comment on the damage model in Far Cry 3?
Far Cry 2 gave you the option to "wound" enemies. Example: Shoot a guy in the leg and he screams out to his buddies for help.
Is this still in Far Cry 3?
Is it just me or are the graphics, for the lack of a better word....muddy?
Cant really explain what I mean. The lighting looks ok, but the filtering seems off. Compared to playing crysis it doesn't seem as organic.
maybe its just the shitty compression of the youtube vids.
Why do I feel this is one of those games where you can tone down the over blown SSAO a notch for no noticeable visual difference and gain ~10 frames.
Watching this again and the game seems to run fine on PS3. Also, it looks like they improved the controls too. Far Cry 2 had some terrible analog stick acceleration, where you would push the stick to aim and keep pushing but the movement didn't seem to register and then suddenly the movement kicked in.
But in this video the controls look quick and responsive.
OT is READY!
I wonder if it'll be ok for me to post it. It IS the 23rd in the UK, right??
OT is READY!
I wonder if it'll be ok for me to post it. It IS the 23rd in the UK, right??
Can anyone comment on the damage model in Far Cry 3?
Far Cry 2 gave you the option to "wound" enemies. Example: Shoot a guy in the leg and he screams out to his buddies for help.
Is this still in Far Cry 3?
Lots of people seem to have the game, but can someone answer this:
Can you turn off HUD elements?
The only question that matters in any game. Need answers, now!
You can't.
sorry if this has been answered, do we know if the 360 version runs in full 1080p and whether it keeps a consistent framerate?
sorry if this has been answered, do we know if the 360 version runs in full 1080p and whether it keeps a consistent framerate?
Ha, thanks for the responses - I'm finally upgrading to a 1080p television, so I'm trying to find out the best examples for HD gaming. I WILL be hooking up my PC to it, although I'm just running a GTX 560 ti, so figuring out if 360 or PC/comfy couch mode is the best way to play. Thinking that even with the PC, I won't be able to run in high or anything, but will at least get full res and can tweak the graphics. My proc also blows, still running a Core 2 Duo overclocked to a whopping 3ghz.
What does that mean?IB Times said:A really good game that's let down by several narrative missteps and a patronising fixation on "content."
What does that mean?
I can decifer the text, but I don't understand the complaint.
"It patronises you with too much content."
Uh, wut?
Just from reading that sentence, it sounds like what Assassin's Creed does: give you a shit ton of meaningless stuff to do, trusting that you will do it not because it's fun or because it gives you something worthwhile, but because it fills that bar up and makes those numbers go up. Then you call it "addictive" and give it 9/10. In other words, exactly what I feared they had done. It'll be interesting to see if it's true.
I do think Assassin's Creed has a lot of pointless busywork that boil down to going to a location and pressing a button, but the missions in this game look like they're much more involved and varied. The hunting miisions seem amazing..
Money seems to be a common reward for missions and exploration, I hope you don't end up overflowing with it, Far Cry 2 diamonds always seemed valuable.