After they attacked him? The Republicans were attacking him as soon as he didn't charge her,in real time, which is exactly what I was pointing out in the post you quoted. Stop trying to move the goalposts. I said Democrats were using Comey as an apoeal to authority. You said that didn't happen. I showed you it did. You...give a non response, then attack me? All rights.
Old hotness:. " Stupid Republicans, listen to the impartial FBI director who determined Hilary did nothing wrong"
New hotness: "biased Comey playing politics wtf"
Old hotness: " Comey in the Clinton pocket playing politics not doing his job"
New hotness: "Comey coming around finally wiling to be honest and reopen investigation"
The quick turnaround by Hillary supporters is by far the most amusing. You can find cites to comey being an authority that should be trusted and listened to anytime anyone brings up emails all over dozens of threads right here on gaf.
4 hours ago all the talk was that this was a non story and the news channels were pulling back coverage of it, but I've had CNN on at work for the past 4 hours and it's been the only story.
4 hours ago all the talk was that this was a non story and the news channels were pulling back coverage of it, but I've had CNN on at work for the past 4 hours and it's been the only story.
How are they using him as an appeal to authority other than using him as an appeal to authority as I already stated and you disagreed with? Pm me if you feel this is a conversation worth continuing.Now you're all over the place. This is you:
You're conflating things here. People are specifically talking about his press conference announcement, which should go against any kind of side talk, since the FBI by and large are a police force that enforces laws and what they say should be the end of it. How are they using him as an appeal to authority other than pointing out that the FBI has found that she has done nothing wrong, other than being an old person who doesn't get tech. In most cases, what your talking about happens when someone says something like "If it was anyone else they would've been arrested." What else should someone say? Not exactly what Comey said?
Then you make it sound like Dems loved Comey, when in fact, the only thing they liked is that he stuck by the evidence.
4 hours ago all the talk was that this was a non story and the news channels were pulling back coverage of it, but I've had CNN on at work for the past 4 hours and it's been the only story.
Well, it's not like there's anything else to report on a Friday night...
How are they using him as an appeal to authority other than using him as an appeal to authority as I already stated and you disagreed with? Pm me if you feel this is a conversation worth continuing.
Really doubt there's anything here. Like the last e-mail fiasco, it was all about nothing much really.
I don't like the FBI coming out with this now though.. 11 days wasn't all that much to wait especially when they don't even know if there's something really worth a shit.
You would think they could dig up another woman groped by Trump....but honestly they've covered it so much I honestly think few people pay attention at this point.
Yeah, it's just frustrating that our media buys into it hook, line, and sinker without even trying to get the facts straight at all just for the sake of ratings and even the evening news shows went in on the "October Surprise" angle despite airing hours after it becoming clear that, at least for the time being, there's nothing here. I hate this. =/Really doubt there's anything here. Like the last e-mail fiasco, it was all about nothing much really.
I don't like the FBI coming out with this now though.. 11 days wasn't all that much to wait especially when they don't even know if there's something really worth a shit.
I have a feeling like some of these emails on weiners laptop were the ones she deleted
Trump is taking super advantage of this. I'm voting for her but she definitely fucked up with the private email servers and is hiding something.
Old hotness:. " Stupid Republicans, listen to the impartial FBI director who determined Hilary did nothing wrong"
New hotness: "biased Comey playing politics wtf"
Old hotness: " Comey in the Clinton pocket playing politics not doing his job"
New hotness: "Comey coming around finally wiling to be honest and reopen investigation"
The quick turnaround by Hillary supporters is by far the most amusing. You can find cites to comey being an authority that should be trusted and listened to anytime anyone brings up emails all over dozens of threads right here on gaf.
It says a lot that for over a decade the GOP has been expending an absurd amount of energy into bringing down HRC and the best they can do is she was kind of careless with a few pieces of classified info.
LOL CNN played that Trump tape for 72 hours straight.
...But that was actually news. It didn't need spinning.
I have a feeling like some of these emails on weiners laptop were the ones she deleted
Trump is taking super advantage of this. I'm voting for her but she definitely fucked up with the private email servers and is hiding something.
So that's news but potential corruption at the top of the US government isn't news?
So that's news but potential corruption at the top of the US government isn't news?
So that's news but potential corruption at the top of the US government isn't news?
This doesn't even make sense.I have a feeling like some of these emails on weiners laptop were the ones she deleted
Trump is taking super advantage of this. I'm voting for her but she definitely fucked up with the private email servers and is hiding something.
So that's news but potential corruption at the top of the US government isn't news?
It's posts like this that make me really giddy for the 8th.
Sigh, but Hillary never actually deleted any of the emails...
It's totally frustrating that people still think she personally one night just started deleting emails out of fear.
There were some deleted emails from 2014 that the FBI found anyway and are included in it's investigation. Then, there was another batch that Hillary's aides asked to be erased in 2015, because they weren't from the time period requested by Congress. But the worker at the company that maintained the server messed up and forgot to delete them until he remember, on the day the emails were subpoenaed, IIRC.
So no, there's no reason to think that suddenly Hillary hid 33,000 emails on Anthony Weiner and Huma Abedin's home computer.
So that's news but potential corruption at the top of the US government isn't news?
Show me the receiptsSo that's news but potential corruption at the top of the US government isn't news?
4 hours ago all the talk was that this was a non story and the news channels were pulling back coverage of it, but I've had CNN on at work for the past 4 hours and it's been the only story.
I just want this election to be over.
I hope it is nothing, but if it is something, I hope they find out what that something is.
So that's news but potential corruption at the top of the US government isn't news?
You can't think of any other reason someone would delete emails?If she had nothing to hide then she wouldn't delete any of them. And the "worker that maintained the email server" is a heavily experienced IT technician who wouldn't make that mistake. And I never said 33k of them were sent to wiener. I'm saying some of the deleted ones might have been sent there. Again, I'm not supporting Trump in the slightest but I'm not going to ignore things I see wrong with Hillary just because she's the better option of the two.
She seems confident that she has nothing to hide and the timing of this sucks for her as it's not enough time for her to be potentially vindicated of this but everyone has to admit she dodges email questions.
If she had nothing to hide then she wouldn't delete any of them. And the "worker that maintained the email server" is a heavily experienced IT technician who wouldn't make that mistake. And I never said 33k of them were sent to wiener. I'm saying some of the deleted ones might have been sent there. Again, I'm not supporting Trump in the slightest but I'm not going to ignore things I see wrong with Hillary just because she's the better option of the two.
Sorry Im coming into this late, but you'd think it would have to be something big if it was discovered during the Weiner deal.
Sorry Im coming into this late, but you'd think it would have to be something big if it was discovered during the Weiner deal.
If she had nothing to hide then she wouldn't delete any of them.
Pls don't admit to a dastardly coverup on a public forum unless you've ensured your IP can't be traced.Did not realize I was hiding something when I delete my mom's chain letters. The more you know.
Did not realize I was hiding something when I delete my mom's chain letters. The more you know.
Did you bleach them tho?
Did you bleach them tho?
You can't think of any other reason someone would delete emails?
Let me give you a tip on logical reasoning: conclusions follow premises, not the other way around. Jumping to the conclusion you favor by assuming that's where the evidence leads means you've ignored every other possibility. That's not just irrational, it's irresponsible, and that way of thinking will lead you into error.
Why would it have to be something big? How are you drawing this conclusion?
Tick tock tick tock tick tock
Do you work in IT?If she had nothing to hide then she wouldn't delete any of them. And the "worker that maintained the email server" is a heavily experienced IT technician who wouldn't make that mistake. And I never said 33k of them were sent to wiener. I'm saying some of the deleted ones might have been sent there. Again, I'm not supporting Trump in the slightest but I'm not going to ignore things I see wrong with Hillary just because she's the better option of the two.
She seems confident that she has nothing to hide and the timing of this sucks for her as it's not enough time for her to be potentially vindicated of this but everyone has to admit she dodges email questions.
Did you bleach them tho?