gundamkyoukai
Member
Because it's now a Action RPG. Now it's more WRPG style than JRPG style.
JRPGS are full of action base combat .
Tales , Star ocean , Nier , Soul games , KH etc etc .
Because it's now a Action RPG. Now it's more WRPG style than JRPG style.
The Ruby and Emerald weapon fights won't feel the same though.
JRPGS are full of action base combat .
Tales , Star ocean , Nier , Soul games , KH etc etc .
JRPGS are full of action base combat .
Tales , Star ocean , Nier , Soul games , KH etc etc .
Final Fantasy XV's combat is a huge pile of shit so this gives me zero hope this remake will be good
FFXV"s combat is one of its best, if not the best, feature.
Ok now name a remake of those games that changes is gameplay from one form to another
If there a opposite to JRPG, that would be Dark Souls.
It seems like you think everything is a JRPG. Those are all dramatically different games.
Nah. I want FFVII made new again. Not just the same old shit but prettier and rebalanced. There's no point to that.Then just call it Final Fantasy 16.
It sounds like that's what you want anyway.
Now name a remake that had to change the whole GFX engine .
Going to have to add tons of cut scene and voice acting .
That going to cost as much as most AAA games today .
As i said before you really can't comapre what FF7 doing to most other remakes\remasters.
LOLIts better then 12 and 13's combat by a huge margin
this is the same dumb shit said repeatedly when anyone mentions wanting it to still be turn based. The genre has far more options than repeating FFVII's same ATB. Doesnt need to be a new genre to be a remake with a new take on the game.Nah. I want FFVII made new again. Not just the same old shit but prettier and rebalanced. There's no point to that.
OT, but fun fact: Secret of Mana started out as a FFIV prototype because they wanted to go the action-based route after FFIII.......
No dude
The distinction of the sub-genre
There is a clear difference between Secret of Mana's gameplay and Final Fantasy 4-6 for example
Action Rpg...... Turn Based RPG. How would you categorize Final Fantasy Tactics?
This language is not new
Final Fantasy VII battle gameplay has been way outclassed by now. It was ok back in 97 when we didn't know anu better, but it, in terms of quality, it wouldn't hold up against today's competition.
Let Dragon Quest be the series for the people who want to live in the past. I'm glad to see Final Fantasy moving on
So lets remake every game in its image?
Im being facetious I know this game is going to be different
It was clear since the first gameplay footage in late 2015 that it wouldn't be classic ATB. Where have you been? Still, I would wait for the next footage. Pretty sure it won't be action-based like Nier Automata or even FFXV and rather a more seamless, immediate evolution of ATB.Well, that's going to save me $80. Thanks for shitting in your long term fans yet again, SE. This was basically my biggest concern regarding the remake, and it has come to pass.
You know what's dumb? Knowing what this game is for a while now and still whining that you wish it was something else. Wanting something else is fine, that's just personal taste. That isn't what this game is though. They're taking it in a different direction, accept it and move on. We have so little information to go on right now that your super angry posturing about how you're definitely not going to buy it looks mega silly.this is the same dumb shit said repeatedly when anyone mentions wanting it to still be turn based. The genre has far more options than repeating FFVII's same ATB. Doesnt need to be a new genre to be a remake with a new take on the game.
Final Fantasy VII battle gameplay has been way outclassed by now. It was ok back in 97 when we didn't know anu better, but it, in terms of quality, it wouldn't hold up against today's competition.
Let Dragon Quest be the series for the people who want to live in the past. I'm glad to see Final Fantasy moving on
It was clear since the first gameplay footage in late 2015 that it wouldn't be classic ATB. Where have you been? Still, I would wait for the next footage. Pretty sure it won't be action-based like Nier Automata or even FFXV and rather a more seamless, immediate evolution of ATB.
Also, you'd be saving 3 x $80 because it will be a trilogy of full games, releasing probably 2 years apart from each other.
its a forum mate, airing displeasure is half the point. And due to mixed messaging until now I was unsure what to expect. This is the first time they have been clear.You know what's dumb? Knowing what this game is for a while now and still whining that you wish it was something else. Wanting something else is fine, that's just personal taste. That isn't what this game is though. They're taking it in a different direction, accept it and move on. We have so little information to go on right now that your super angry posturing about how you're definitely not going up buy it looks mega silly.
right, I took it then and was pissed about it, but then thanks to interviews since then being completely mixed messaging. Things like "Its not really an action game", and the last few screenshots showing things that didnt quite make sense for an action game, I had a bit of hope. This is the first clear messaging, first thing that smashes the last of that hope.It was clear since the first gameplay footage in late 2015 that it wouldn't be classic ATB. Where have you been? Still, I would wait for the next footage. Pretty sure it won't be action-based like Nier Automata or even FFXV and rather a more seamless, immediate evolution of ATB.
Also, you'd be saving 3 x $80 because it will be a trilogy of full games, releasing probably 2 years apart from each other.
Final Fantasy VII battle gameplay has been way outclassed by now. It was ok back in 97 when we didn't know anu better, but it, in terms of quality, it wouldn't hold up against today's competition.
Let Dragon Quest be the series for the people who want to live in the past. I'm glad to see Final Fantasy moving on
You don't even know what "action based" means here. You refer to it as an action game but that's different from an action BASED game which leaves room for other elements as well. This still isn't clear messaging and I suspect we won't actually get a clear answer to any of this until we get Nomura sitting down and actually explaining real footage of the game.its a forum mate, airing displeasure is half the point. And due to mixed messaging until now I was unsure what to expect. This is the first time they have been clear.
right, I took it then and was pissed about it, but then thanks to interviews since then being completely mixed messaging. Things like "Its not really an action game", and the last few screenshots showing things that didnt quite make sense for an action game, I had a bit of hope. This is the first clear messaging, first thing that smashes the last of that hope.
I think what the Nomura defense force doesn't realize, is how important the turn-based gameplay is to the pacing of the game. The turn-based battles give the game a contemplative, dignified pace. After the death of Aeris, the turn-based battle against Jenova Life gives the player a chance to reflect on the momentous events that just transpired. It strengthens the game's deep themes and Shakespearean script. Replacing that with a button-mash fest would ruin the moment's quiet dignity. It would fit in a class-less Western game that's all about tits and bad-ass sword, but here it is as jarring as snowboarding scene would have been right after the deaths of Romeo and Juliet
What the Shit is this
We should drop genres and gametypes based on some bizarre perception that only Action Rpgs are modern?
The fuck?
Lol, he says this like he actually believes the best RPGs are coming out today. Lmao.
It amazes me how absolutely enraged FF fans get when discussing action combat. It's almost comical.
This is literally the most funny post I've ever read on this god forsaken website.I think what the Nomura defense force doesn't realize, is how important the turn-based gameplay is to the pacing of the game. The turn-based battles give the game a contemplative, dignified pace. After the death of Aeris, the turn-based battle against Jenova Life gives the player a chance to reflect on the momentous events that just transpired. It strengthens the game's deep themes and Shakespearean script. Replacing that with a button-mash fest would ruin the moment's quiet dignity. It would fit in a class-less Western game that's all about tits and bad-ass sword, but here it is as jarring as snowboarding scene would have been right after the deaths of Romeo and Juliet
Final Fantasy VII battle gameplay has been way outclassed by now. It was ok back in 97 when we didn't know anu better, but it, in terms of quality, it wouldn't hold up against today's competition.
Let Dragon Quest be the series for the people who want to live in the past. I'm glad to see Final Fantasy moving on
Bravely Default, Persona, Various Dungeon crawler games
What the shit is this
We should drop genres and gametypes based on some bizarre perception that only Action Rpgs are modern?
The fuck?
We're moving on to a combat system that isn't as good as the original (if it even remotely resembles FF15) for a remake of a 20 year old game that's going to be released in multiple installments over the next half a decade. If that's moving on, then I'm completely fine with living in the past.
REmake.Now name a remake that had to change the whole GFX engine .
Going to have to add tons of cut scene and voice acting .
That going to cost as much as most AAA games today .
This is literally the most funny post I've ever read on this god forsaken website.
REmake.
And it cost like most AAA games in it time.
but its still an action game, they are clear about that now. I play a metric fuckton of action games of all types. Its not like I dont enjoy them, its just thats not what ffvii is, and definitely not what I want ffvii to turn into. They could have come up with the best action combat ever made and its still not ffvii. Made more depressing by the current state of turn based games.You don't even know what "action based" means here. You refer to it as an action game but that's different from an action BASED game which leaves room for other elements as well. This still isn't clear messaging and I suspect we won't actually get a clear answer to any of this until we get Nomura sitting down and actually explaining real footage of the game.
I have to agree with you on this. I am looking forward to the posts/threads following the release of the next gameplay video.
Just because the game is smaller is your excuse lolThey going to have to do much more work on the FF7 remake than a RE one .
Hell FF7 back in the day cost as much as a lot of AAA games today.
No way is the RE remake even close .
What made the FF series popular in the first place was having Turn-Based/ATB gameplay.
You never fix what's broken.
Haven't read through the thread, but am I right in assuming 50+% of the posts equate to "MUH TURN BASED" or random shitting on FFXV?
lol no, it was better storytelling than what was offered by most of the competition at the time
luckily, now that they no longer know how to tell good stories, they have learnt how to make fun moment-to-moment gameplay
Just because the game is smaller is your excuse lol
REmake did all FFVII is trying to do without change the genre.