Mark Rippetoe: Training pure conditioning without a strength base is a waste of time.
Agree with that. By the same token you cant just ignore conditioning. It's not too hard to find the right balance for yourself so long as you're not ignoring one or the other.
http://www.t-nation.com/free_online_article/most_recent/conditioning_is_a_sham
Agree with that. By the same token you cant just ignore conditioning. It's not too hard to find the right balance for yourself so long as you're not ignoring one or the other.
http://www.t-nation.com/free_online_article/most_recent/conditioning_is_a_sham
Now that adequate bandwidth has been restored, here's a shocking statement that applies to all novice lifters, as well as the vast majority of all trainees: training specifically for conditioning without a well-developed strength base is a waste of time.
There's simply no better way to increase your work capacity than increasing your ability to produce force. If your primary interest is being more effective at moving yourself and/or submaximal or maximal loads more efficiently, training for strength contributes much more to your goal than training for endurance.
The reason for this should be obvious. Maximal loads are your 1RMs in the basic lifts. For a 200-pound male of average height, a 1.75x bodyweight squat, a 2x bodyweight deadlift, and a .75x bodyweight press constitute a well-developed strength base.
Although this isn't considered "strong" by competitive lifters, it represents a level of strength that's attainable by 95% of male trainees in a few short months of reasonably efficient training on the lifts. More importantly, it makes commonly encountered submaximal tasks much easier repetitively, and this is what we mean by "work capacity."