I mean, I don't think anyone who is serious about combat sports believes that Conor lost only because he was gassed or that Conor won the early rounds because he's some super-duper boxer.
It's pretty obvious that Floyd was being Floyd and spent the early rounds putting change in the meter. That's not quite the same as "toying" with Conor. I don't that's an accurate way to describe it. But there's no question in my mind that Conor was never ahead in any meaningful sense. (If I race against the 10000m world champion, and I spend the first 200m ahead of him because I'm sprinting, it's neither true that he's "toying" with me nor true that I'm actually beating him. Haha.)
I'm looking at MMA writers who are saying exactly that as well as questioning how people saw the early rounds. Dude was giving Conor 4 rounds while not even bothering to acknowledge the borderline illegal attacks Conor was throwing out almost every round. With some MMA journalists acknowledging Conor's tactics, I'm just trying to make the point that there are still some people out there that aren't capable of giving Conor props without acknowledging how completely one side that match was.
It was all part of the plan to take 111 punches.
That's the first thing they teach you in boxing.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rope-a-dope
But Floyd literally saying that was his gameplan isn't enough for you? He played the man like a damn fiddle from start to finish.