Obliterator
Member
FFS the inside game in boxing is COMPLETELY different.
Sure it is, but pretending like McGregor has no skill there is foolish to say the least. In fact it's probably the single best attribute he has in this entire fight
FFS the inside game in boxing is COMPLETELY different.
Sure it is, but pretending like McGregor has no skill there is foolish to say the least. In fact it's probably the single best attribute he has in this entire fight
He doesn't my man. Inside fighting in the UFC and Boxing are completely different.
Yea Conor's gonna come into the ring with some crazy unexpected moves and reinvent boxing to beat the best boxer ever...
LOOOL at you think conor can fight on the inside. Thats a realllly difficult skill to learn.
I believe Floyd hasn't lost it. He stayed in great shape even after retiring.Man i cant wait to see if floyd still has these matrix skills and can pull them versus McG....if McG wants to end this within 4 rounds he will be on the offensive....wouldnt that play to Floyds strengths?
1. It's not that far apart. It's more like a rugby union team against a rugby league team. Very similar sport with minor differences in the rule set and what is allowed. Many players make the transition seamlessly between codes
The unorthodox idea comes from the fact that boxing IQ also is heavily embedded in predicting the way a boxer moves. A guy like Floyd can toy with opponents because boxers all move in such a predictable way. Pivots, slips, stances are all fairly standard. A guy who doesn't conform to the norm means a lot of those strategies become harder to use for Floyd
And I'd also put forward It's not because he is from a different discipline or is going to use a karate stance, it's because Conor has an unorthodox striking style to begin with even amongst UFC fighters. He uses deceptive speed and pacing, slow to fast in an instant. He has deceptive reach because of his habit of disconnecting the shoulder. He sets you up like a chess master. And he is a master of movement. He doesn't make mistakes in that regard.
Does this mean Conor will win? No. But it does add some interest how something like the style that has dismantled two divisions in the UFC will hold up in a boxing match
He will 100% fight as dirty as he can get away with without getting DQ'd. You think he paid for Joe Cortez to ref every fight to learn the rules? He could just read them. It was to know how much he could bend the rules. We already saw small clips from sparring with him pushing the rules. We know he got 2 points taken on the Paulie spar. He's not going in there to box.
He's talked about how he's gonna be like water in there a true martial artist. He's gonna use every resource available to him within the rules in there. I'm almost convinced he's gonna block a shot from Mayweather with his forehead to hurt his hands. Watch the whole 8oz glove thing be 4D chess just designed to hurt Mayweather's brittle hands.
Thing is we have no idea what McGregor is gonna come up with and that's why we're buying this.
You know the reason why boxers don't use unorthodox fighting techniques? Because it doesn't work.
Everything that made McGregor a good MMA fighter is what makes him a terrible boxer.
Mayweather has worn 8oz gloves in 46 of his 49 fights tho..... It's not like Floyd is just giving up an advantage, hes actually helping himself by going down to a glove weight he is accustomed to.
You show Hamed there, but it worked for him for quite some time. You could argue that he wasn't even close to well prepared enough to fight Barerra either.
(I couldn't stand Hamed for what it's worth, but that style of his definitely worked for the 5 years he was world featherweight champion)
And had to take a knee once because he hurt his hand against the other guy's skull. I'm saying McGregor will look to do that on purpose. In his mind he doesn't mind getting hit by a guy 20 pounds lighter if he gets to hurt him in return. That tactic works way better in 8oz than 10oz gloves.
Remember that McGregor is looking to disrupt boxing, he's gonna do weird shit in there.
I've read through all 10 pages and have agreed with most of the stuff said but this right here.... nah breh
You know the reason why boxers don't use unorthodox fighting techniques? Because it doesn't work. I've seen a lot of "this fight is going to be like Floyd vs Gatti" but I think it will be more like Marco Antonio Barrera vs Prince Naseem Hamed. Barrera was a tactician and Hamed was the hard hitting, undefeated, unorthodoxed fighter who got schooolllleddddd by Barrera. Hamed always had a weird ass stance, Threw punches from crazy angles, lunged when he punched, showboated and was arrogant as McGregor.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgXJ8xeckNM
If you wanna prove that point, you *really* shouldn't use a dude that went 36-1 with 31 knockout victories as an example. Most boxers would absolutely kill for that kinda record.
Group chat with my buds today has been great....very active. Usually not this active unless it's football season. The hype for the fight is crazy. The host for our viewing party is a huge UFC fan and has been posting bloodied McGregor GIFs all day.
Anyway, just got done ordering 3 prime grade blue cheese crusted filet mignons (at the local meat shop) for the party host, the coworker I have a $100 bet with, and myself. A handful of Brisket & blue cheese burgers for the rest. It's going to be a feast.
Im just hoping it's not another boring ass Mayweather fight. And even though I have a $100 on Mayweather, I'm kinda hoping Conor wins just for the reactions on GAF & social media.
The point I am trying to make is that the tactician schooled the guy that fights unconventionally.
P.S.
That one loss was to Barrera, the tactician.
Group chat with my buds today has been great....very active. Usually not this active unless it's football season. The hype for the fight is crazy. The host for our viewing party is a huge UFC fan and has been posting bloodied McGregor GIFs all day.
Anyway, just got done ordering 3 prime grade blue cheese crusted filet mignons (at the local meat shop) for the party host, the coworker I have a $100 bet with, and myself. A handful of Brisket & blue cheese burgers for the rest. It's going to be a feast.
Im just hoping it's not another boring ass Mayweather fight. And even though I have a $100 on Mayweather, I'm kinda hoping Conor wins just for the reactions on GAF & social media.
And had to take a knee once because he hurt his hand against the other guy's skull. I'm saying McGregor will look to do that on purpose. In his mind he doesn't mind getting hit by a guy 20 pounds lighter if he gets to hurt him in return. That tactic works way better in 8oz than 10oz gloves.
Remember that McGregor is looking to disrupt boxing, he's gonna do weird shit in there.
If you wanna prove that point, you *really* shouldn't use a dude that went 36-1 with 31 knockout victories as an example. Most boxers would absolutely kill for that kinda record.
I quite doubt that you think for even a second that Barrera was the only tactician Hamed ever fought, rendering your point quite moot. Especially since Hamed was also a tactician, as the description in the video you linked explains. Just so happens that Barrera was better and more prepared for the fight than Hamed.
Unorthodox works until you meet someone flat-out better than you. Which makes it quite goddamn similar to orthodox.
admittedly i never followed Hamed's career, but who exactly did he fight that was quality? From reading, seems like Hamed's train got derailed the day he signed to fight a very good fighter in Barrera.
Where did you get the notion that i think Conor has any chance of victory at all in this match? Floyd will utterly destroy him. As far as boxing prowess is concerned, Mayweather is one of the Greats.So Floyd isn't a better tactician? He's not a "flat-out better" boxer than Conor?
admittedly i never followed Hamed's career, but who exactly did he fight that was quality? From reading, seems like Hamed's train got derailed the day he signed to fight a very good fighter in Barrera.
When you're right, you're right!If only Mayweather could box as well as Nate Diaz he would have a chance....
You're saying McGregor is going to get hit in the face on purpose in an attempt to hurt Mayweather's hands?
admittedly i never followed Hamed's career, but who exactly did he fight that was quality? From reading, seems like Hamed's train got derailed the day he signed to fight a very good fighter in Barrera.
admittedly i never followed Hamed's career, but who exactly did he fight that was quality? From reading, seems like Hamed's train got derailed the day he signed to fight a very good fighter in Barrera.
Not in the face, on the forehead. I don't think Conor would do it because it's like a street fight tactic and I don't see him being that dirty. Dirty boxing is not being dirty if you understand the distinction I am trying to make.
Which is gonna be a better fight, this or gall vs Phil Brooks
If only Mayweather could box as well as Nate Diaz he would have a chance....
Yeah the Prince is a legend imo.If you wanna prove that point, you *really* shouldn't use a dude that went 36-1 with 31 knockout victories as an example. Most boxers would absolutely kill for that kinda record.
Remember that McGregor is looking to disrupt boxing, he's gonna do weird shit in there.
You're saying McGregor is going to get hit in the face on purpose in an attempt to hurt Mayweather's hands?