Blablurn said:neuer finally arrived in munich, his first training starts tomorrow. cant wait to see him in a bayern shirt.
They will have the 'conference-chat' with the neuer-haters tomorrow?
Blablurn said:neuer finally arrived in munich, his first training starts tomorrow. cant wait to see him in a bayern shirt.
elsk said:They will have the 'conference-chat' with the neuer-haters tomorrow?
Lightning said:Oh I so hope Arsenal have not done the unthinkable and sold Fabregas on the cheap....
Really depressed right now...
odd_morsel said:I imagine he thinks 'on the cheap' is in the 35 million range, which is probably a pretty fair valuation for Cesc.
dc89 said:Palermo president has confirmed the club has received a 50M bid for Pastore.
http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11865_7010159,00.html
Sorry if old. But please let it be City.
Completely agreed, Zamparini comes across as a desperate moron just randomly going on every day about how much his player his worth despite no clubs seemingly being even slightly interested at the prices he's going on about.confuziz said:I don't think any other club is crazy enough to put down 50 million for such a player.
dc89 said:Palermo president has confirmed the club has received a 50M bid for Pastore.
http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11865_7010159,00.html
Sorry if old. But please let it be City.
dc89 said:Palermo president has confirmed the club has received a 50M bid for Pastore.
http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11865_7010159,00.html
Sorry if old. But please let it be City.
Zibrahim said:That's what I mean though. It is more than likely that there is no replacement for Cesc at the moment. Not only is he the captain, he creates a lot of chances in the midfield. Samir Nasri is a good replacement, in my opinion, but he will likely leave to play for Man U. That's just an offer most players can't deny.
I think Jack Wilshere is a great winger for Arsenal, but you're right, he isn't world class or Champions League class.
The Professor's in a heap of trouble at this rate for the summer.
Greyface said:Has Diaby's stock fallen so low? Every time it's Wilshire then Ramsay mentioned as the replacements for Fabregas and Nasri and Diaby isn't considered to be a contender. Is he on the transfer list?
Plasma said:Not on the transfer list, we actually rejected a 10m offer from a Turkish club in the week.
He isn't mentioned much because he plays a game or two then picks up an injury that will rule him out for a few weeks.
LabouredSubterfuge said:Biggest transfer blunder of the summer?
Ushojax said:Yeah, you would have thought Arsenal would snap their hands off. Diaby is another of Arsenal's reasonably talented players who happens to be made of glass.
Moobabe said:Yep - I'd sell him for 10, Fab for 35+, Denilson + Rosicky for 10 ish. That money, coupled with the money Arsene never spent after selling Adebayour and Toure to City, AND the money that we know Arsenal have anyway could buy them a league winning side.
Given, Samba, Cahill, Gervinho, Hazard, Parker for a start. Job done.
Moobabe said:Yep - I'd sell him for 10, Fab for 35+, Denilson + Rosicky for 10 ish. That money, coupled with the money Arsene never spent after selling Adebayour and Toure to City, AND the money that we know Arsenal have anyway could buy them a league winning side.
Given, Samba, Cahill, Gervinho, Hazard, Parker for a start. Job done.
Messi said:AC Milan said they are not bidding on fab because he is already going to another club![]()
HixxSAFC said:That lot would cost 80m+. Arsenal will never spend that in one window.
Lille reportedly want £35m+ for Hazard.
eh? Or in a world where Phil Jones costs... Or De Gea costs... This isn't something isolated to Liverpool.Tim the Wiz said:Oh shi--
I wanted to start my reply with "In a world where Henderson costs..." but I can hear the groans of the Liverpool posters already. But, yeah, the market is crazy enough that I'll believe that price. Still can't believe City bid 50m euros for Pastore.
HixxSAFC said:That lot would cost 80m+. Arsenal will never spend that in one window.
Lille reportedly want £35m+ for Hazard.
Arnie said:eh? Or in a world where Phil Jones costs... Or De Gea costs... This isn't something isolated to Liverpool.
Newsflash, young, promising, British players are expensive in the Premier League. Young talented players from across the world cost big money too.
confuziz said:I don't think any other club is crazy enough to put down 50 million for such a player. He is good, but not messi/ronaldo good..
Messi said:For all that he has achieved, Victor Valdés remains one of the worlds most underrated goalkeepers and he deserves some real recognition.
If by mugged off you mean payed over the odds then I wholeheartedly agree, but as I've said that is the price you have to pay for young, british talent. As far as Torres goes you guys payed over the odds because you have a crackpot owner who knows little about football enforcing the transfers. Similarly I think United payed over the odds for Jones at this current time, doesn't mean he won't turn into a fantastic player, which is exactly what they've payed for.Moobabe said:I'll call it as I see it regardless of club - I thought Jones was a good buy, I thought Liverpool got mugged on Henderson and Carrol but then we were stupid enough to pay you £50 mil for Torres.
BatmanBatmanBatman said:Zamps is a compulsive liar so it's hard to trust anything before Pastore is on another clubs site with their shirt on.
Only thing he is underrated in is asshole level and he is only underrated in that because you got Pinto on the bench.
farhatraza said:Nobody has bid 50m for Pastore. Not a chance. If they had that bid would have been accepted and the deal would be close to being done.
BatmanBatmanBatman said:Well... Pastore would need to reach a agreement too wouldn't he? He has rejected a top english club before according to both Zamps and Pastore's agent, he doesn't want to rot on some bench in England so I doubt he will go to City.
Arnie said:If by mugged off you mean payed over the odds then I wholeheartedly agree, but as I've said that is the price you have to pay for young, british talent. As far as Torres goes you guys payed over the odds because you have a crackpot owner who knows little about football enforcing the transfers. Similarly I think United payed over the odds for Jones at this current time, doesn't mean he won't turn into a fantastic player, which is exactly what they've payed for.
It's a strange one though, because prior to moving to their respective clubs, Carroll, Henderson and Jones were highly praised as talented youngsters. Now they've moved they're lambasted as overpriced wasters who'll go on to do nothing.
Yeah that is true but I still don't believe it. If a bid that big had been made I think it would be out in the open.BatmanBatmanBatman said:Well... Pastore would need to reach a agreement too wouldn't he? He has rejected a top english club before according to both Zamps and Pastore's agent, he doesn't want to rot on some bench in England so I doubt he will go to City.
Messi said:Every club under the sun has been linked with pastore. Won't believe. He actually moved until he is in a new kit on a field.
Messi said:Pinto is a punk, valdes is just a passionate clown.
farhatraza said:Yeah that is true but I still don't believe it. If a bid that big had been made I think it would be out in the open.
Also, I'd be surprised if Pastore did turn down a CL placed English team.
Whilst I would agree that out of the three of them Jones looks the most talented at this moment in time I acknowledge that at such an age the only way to fulfill potential is to play games (see Wilshere, Sturridge etc). I personally think Henderson and Carroll will get more game time than Jones will at United so I don't think it's as clear cut as we make out. It's great for United to have an asset for the future as long as he can make enough progress in the first team, and in a team with Ferdinand, Vidic and Smalling(who I really rate) that will be tough.Moobabe said:I would never proclaim to be a fortune teller - but of the three Jones was the only one that I thought was a serious talent. I've watched all three numerous times and while Carroll has good attributes I'm still a skeptic - but as for Henderson I never understood the fuss. He played well in a few games without being sensational and, for me at least, £20m is a serious amount of money to pay for someone like him.
BatmanBatmanBatman said:I don't believe it either. But just because he hasn't been officially presented yet does not mean it isn't true.
Valdes and his constant running from one part of the pitch to another just to participate in the small fights is sickening. Sadly he gets away with it all the time as he is part of the unicef conspiracy.
Not even a card.
Arnie said:Whilst I would agree that out of the three of them Jones looks the most talented at this moment in time I acknowledge that at such an age the only way to fulfill potential is to play games (see Wilshere, Sturridge etc). I personally think Henderson and Carroll will get more game time than Jones will at United so I don't think it's as clear cut as we make out. It's great for United to have an asset for the future as long as he can make enough progress in the first team, and in a team with Ferdinand, Vidic and Smalling(who I really rate) that will be tough.
Arnie said:Whilst I would agree that out of the three of them Jones looks the most talented at this moment in time I acknowledge that at such an age the only way to fulfill potential is to play games (see Wilshere, Sturridge etc). I personally think Henderson and Carroll will get more game time than Jones will at United so I don't think it's as clear cut as we make out. It's great for United to have an asset for the future as long as he can make enough progress in the first team, and in a team with Ferdinand, Vidic and Smalling(who I really rate) that will be tough.
Yes we should do that, a little meta game mid season.Ashes1396 said:Purely as a -just for fun- thing we ought to have a 3-way race between those three next season...
Man utd roll out their squad a lot more than other clubs, but you're right he does have a few directly above him. We haven't played the same 11 two games in row in like... Forever Though.
farhatraza said:Jones will play 20 matches for us at least I reckon, quite possibly more. Last season O'Shea played 32 games (only 3 from the bench) and he may be leaving. Evans played 21 games (again only 3 from the bench) and you'd expect Jones to be ahead of him in the pecking order. Brown played 15 games (5 from the bench) and he also looks set to leave. If Brown and O'Shea leave that's almost 40 appearances to be picked up by somebody else in the squad. Plus Jones can be DM if needed too.
Regards to SAF rotating vs Rafa. The main difference I guess was the results as far as the media criticism goes. I can't really remember now...but I am guessing the media got on Benitez's back about it because it was costing the team results. Plus...the media are just very very very careful ever calling out SAF on football decisions. They've done it so many times and been made to look silly.
EDIT - Guardian reporting Clichy is going to City for 7m.
Messi said:Fuuuuuuu...
Messi said:Fuuuuuuu...