operon said:
Excellent, really stood up when he was needed last season. We tied Andre Wisdom up with a long term contract yesterday too, probably our most exciting defensive talent.
operon said:
farhatraza said:Also, he said that if Nasri wanted to join United he had to respect the clubs traditions and history. Not sure what he meant by that really...surprised to hear him comment at all. United seem to be taking a different approach on this transfer, it is a unique type of deal I suppose.
Meus Renaissance said:What does he think the club is, the City of Atlantis? The culture of a club is to turn up to training and put the ball into the net. Or do Utd players turn up every Sunday and sing Kumbaya My Lord at a fire camp? Talk about inflated ego. No one signs for tradition [what is tradition other than trying to win games, the same as everyone else]. Its trophies and £££ but he can tell himself what he likes if it helps sleep him at night
omgkitty said:Oh here comes some fun right here! Barca to make a 50 million bid for Bale. Maybe they will leave Cesc alone and give Tottenham a headache instead. Supposedly it's going to take them a year to get the deal done.
Source
Meus Renaissance said:This is one thing that has always disturbed me about footballers. Most of them literally know nothing else but the club they've been at or kicking a ball. It's kinda pathetic. I remember reading Fabrice Muamba's parents wouldn't allow him to abandon his medical studies so he could become a doctor after he ended his football career. Respect!
near said:Typical unwarranted report from goal. Why would Barcelona aggressively bid 50million for Bale, when they aren't willing to pay 35million for there long-term target Fabregas?
I hope Andre Wisdom gets games this year. He's an absolute beast and has a very good passing range.Mastadon said:Excellent, really stood up when he was needed last season. We tied Andre Wisdom up with a long term contract yesterday too, probably our most exciting defensive talent.
dschalter said:classic goal.com quality reporting.
BildAccording to BILD, Bayern has intensified efforts to sign Alex and it seems that a sum of 10 million might do the trick.
LabouredSubterfuge said:Awww bless you. Only a real fan would come to their club's protection after such a vituperative attack. Funny how no-one else gets so worked up about the odd jibe about their club. I think you may genuinely have a problem. You really don't have to read my posts though. Especially if it pains you to do so. Although I imagine reading causes you pain generally.
As a side note, I'd like to propose that sarcasm isn't the lowest form of wit. Quite demonstrably so. But thank you for resorting to a personal attack in any case. We all know you can't do better.
Do keep up with whole being popular thing Kermit.
"You have to look at it soberly - the player is under contract with Manchester City and the decision lies with them," he told Spox. "They have demanded a price we will never be willing to pay."
Bayern initially offered 9 million for the defender, while City demanded 20m. The German side increased their bid to 12m, and earlier this week were reportedly close to reaching an agreement on a 15m release, but have apparently failed in their final offer.
Rummenigge went on to criticise City for their reluctance to sell Boateng, despite their surplus of defenders and the player's desire to move to Munich.
"At the moment they're using a tactic that I've never seen: they don't respond, even if we try to contact them.
farhatraza said:So apparently Etihad (who have never made a profit) are sponsoring City's ground and complex at £30m a year!?!? Hahaha. That is madness. Hope UEFA look into that and tell City to do one...unlikely though :-/
Tariq Panja who works for Bloomberg (I think?) broke it on his Twitter. He is pretty reliable when it comes to these kinds of things.Kermit The Dog said:Source?
Etihad has naming rights on a major stadium in Melbourne, Victoria, an indoor-AFL ground. Also called Etihad Stadium. = ( Might get a bit confusing.
But Etihad seem to be everywhere, so the fact they have never made a profit is interesting.
http://m.arabianbusiness.com/etihad-unlikely-break-even-ceo-admits-182515.htmlKermit The Dog said:Source?
Etihad has naming rights on a major stadium in Melbourne, Victoria, an indoor-AFL ground. Also called Etihad Stadium. = ( Might get a bit confusing.
But Etihad seem to be everywhere, so the fact they have never made a profit is interesting.
Arsene Wenger said:Lets hope we can bring in one or two more additions of top quality.
Plasma said:
Plasma said:
Meus Renaissance said:We don't have the money
Kermit The Dog said:Is there some sort of budget Arsenal have for the transfer window?
omgkitty said:I find it really funny that this question is coming from a Manchester City fan. Yes, it is rumored to be somewhere around 50 million. Of course, Wenger is not going to spend all that, and hopefully with the sales of our unwanted players, we wont have to spend very much money.
Meus Renaissance said:We don't have the money
Kermit The Dog said:Is there some sort of budget Arsenal have for the transfer window?
Bungieware said:Gervinho is a fantastic player. I would question why Wenger signing another attacking midfielder, but considering Fabregas and Nasri will probably go, Denilson saying he's done at Arsenal, Rosicky not really playing and entering the last year of his contract, Arshavin not being in favour, and Walcott being a terrible player, I would say it's a pretty important position to strengthen. But it won't offset the damage done by the departure of their two best midfielders. I feel a bit sorry for Wenger, but he dug this hole with his ownphilosophiespoor squad management. And he still hasn't brought in any world class defenders or a proven goalkeeper. Losing your best players whilst failing to strengthen your weakest positions... classic Wenger.
+1 for the importance of a director of football.
I wasn't having a go, it was a genuine question. I hadn't heard of the 50 million figure, so I was just curious. City have spent 15 million this window on two players, so it's not like we're going mental.
And a goalkeeper. And defensive midfielder. And a striker who isn't injured half the year. And another centre back.omgkitty said:Well he did confirm the Gervinho signing was soon and the key word in that sentence is "top quality". I would assume his 1 or 2 signings is dependent on the players he wants to stay as staying. That could include a center back and a left back.
Yenrot said:And a goalkeeper. And defensive midfielder. And a striker who isn't injured half the year. And another centre back.
omgkitty said:I hate when people say we need a GK. Almost all of these people are not Arsenal supporters. We have Szczęsny and Fabianski. DM we have Frimpong and Eastmond as backup, with one of them likely making the first team this summer permanently. In front, we have almost just signed Gervinho, who can play there, as well as van Persie, Chamakh, and Vela who is reportedly staying. I would like Bendtner to stay, and if played in the correct position, I think he could be great for us. Who knows if this will happen though.
No offence mate, but youre perspective is just what Wengers seems to be...which is precisely the problem. Arsenal need players for now, players better than they have already, players better than what the compeition have. Sczenzenenzeny I can see him sticking with, fair enough, potential there. All the other names mentioned are not gonna help, not enough, not now.omgkitty said:I hate when people say we need a GK. Almost all of these people are not Arsenal supporters. We have Szczęsny and Fabianski. DM we have Frimpong and Eastmond as backup, with one of them likely making the first team this summer permanently. In front, we have almost just signed Gervinho, who can play there, as well as van Persie, Chamakh, and Vela who is reportedly staying. I would like Bendtner to stay, and if played in the correct position, I think he could be great for us. Who knows if this will happen though.
Slizz said:Only one person out of all those positions is a new signing. Saying Arsenal needs improvement in those areas is because of a result of the last few seasons, and those players you listed have already been there.
farhatraza said:No offence mate, but youre perspective is just what Wengers seems to be...which is precisely the problem. Arsenal need players for now, players better than they have already, players better than what the compeition have. Sczenzenenzeny I can see him sticking with, fair enough, potential there. All the other names mentioned are not gonna help, not enough, not now.
I assumed Gervinho would play wide right in place of Walcott who is shite and injury prone.omgkitty said:I hate when people say we need a GK. Almost all of these people are not Arsenal supporters. We have Szczęsny and Fabianski. DM we have Frimpong and Eastmond as backup, with one of them likely making the first team this summer permanently. In front, we have almost just signed Gervinho, who can play there, as well as van Persie, Chamakh, and Vela who is reportedly staying. I would like Bendtner to stay, and if played in the correct position, I think he could be great for us. Who knows if this will happen though.
danwarb said:Yes that would be Lucas.
Some Opta numbers/games for last season lifted off WhoScored.com for just some of our many CMs, and Vaughan.
Code:Apps Tackle Int. Foul Clr Dribbled past Blk Shot OG Lucas Leiva 32(1) 5.2 2 2 1.6 1.7 0.3 - David Vaughan 35 4 2 1 1.6 1.5 0.4 - Gerrard 20(1) 2.8 1.8 1.1 1.7 0.3 0.6 - Spearing 10(1) 2.5 1.5 0.5 1.1 0.5 0.2 - Meireles 32(1) 2.4 2.1 0.8 0.7 1.1 0.2 - Charlie Adam 34(1) 2.1 1.9 2 2.8 1.4 0.5 1 Henderson 37 1.7 1.7 0.7 0.9 1 0.2 -
Code:Apps Assist KPpg Avg Pass% Cross Long Trb Lucas Leiva 32(1) 1 0.7 54.4 83 - 3 0.2 David Vaughan 35 2 0.7 48.4 87 0.6 4.1 0.1 Charlie Adam 34(1) 8 2.1 53.8 72 1.3 7.5 0.3 Gerrard 20(1) 5 2.5 59.8 80 1.6 5.6 0.3 Meireles 32(1) 5 2 40.8 78 1.5 2 0.1 Henderson 37 4 2.2 44.4 81 1.5 3.5 0.2 Spearing 10(1) - 0.6 38.3 80 0.1 2.7 0.1
Yenrot said:I assumed Gervinho would play wide right in place of Walcott who is shite and injury prone.
As for DM, how many games have Frimpong and Eastmond played for Arsenals first team?
RVP is great in the 25 games a season he plays but Chamakh is not an adequate replacement for him and you are the first Arsenal fan I've seen supporting Bendtner.
Edit: ^ As for "backup to Song" I think Arsenal could do much better than him.
An adequate replacement for RVP then?omgkitty said:When Bendtner plays up front, he scores goals. He showed great skill in 2009, but he played out wide all last season. Given a chance through the center, he's better than Chamakh. If anything, I don't like Chamakh, and wish we would ship him back to France and sign a replacement, but I seriously doubt that is going to happen.
Yenrot said:An adequate replacement for RVP then?
omgkitty said:I hate when people say we need a GK. Almost all of these people are not Arsenal supporters.
Yep. Depending on the severity, this could be it for him. Damn shame too. He's only 28.broony said:Essien is fucked.
omgkitty said:When Bendtner plays up front, he scores goals. He showed great skill in 2009, but he played out wide all last season. Given a chance through the center, he's better than Chamakh. If anything, I don't like Chamakh, and wish we would ship him back to France and sign a replacement, but I seriously doubt that is going to happen.
Frimpong shows real promise, or at least he did last summer. He's going to have a shot this summer. I will change my position if he ends up being terrible.
Baconsarnie said:Chamakh is a good player, we just didn't use him to his strengths. Our crossing is terrible, and heading is Chamakh's main strength and most crosses were too long or went out of play.
Gervinho can play either wing or upfront so can cover for RVP or Walcott. Still would like another main striker. I don't think Song is good enough either, if Diarra waited 6 months he would have been starting when Flamini and Gilberto left. Would still re-sign him though!
Many Arsenal fans were expecting a left back to be added to the shopping list after the experienced Frenchman was sold earlier this week for around £7m, but when pressed on the reason for the sale, Wenger told Arsenal Player, The reasoning is that Kieran Gibbs at some stage has to get a chance to play. And Gael had only one year to go.
I rate Gael very highly but I rate highly as well Kieran Gibbs, and he is now at an age where he has to play. And thats the main reason behind that, to give Gibbs a chance.
Lightning said:omgkitty, do you think it good news that Wenger vows to fight as hard as he can to keep Cesc? I'm personally delighted by this. Please Wenger, succeed in keeping our crown jewel.
But still buy Mata. We still need him without question.
Lightning said:omgkitty, do you think it good news that Wenger vows to fight as hard as he can to keep Cesc? I'm personally delighted by this. Please Wenger, succeed in keeping our crown jewel.
But still buy Mata. We still need him without question.
Oh boy... Fuck I really don't like Wenger's policy of developing players at the expense of success. Gibbs isn't up to it yet and by the time Wenger figures it out we've lost another season...omgkitty said:According to Wenger, part of the reason that Clichy was allowed to leave was because Gibbs needs to play.
Source
This isn't really looking good for us as far as signing a replacement.
Lightning said:Oh boy... Fuck I really don't like Wenger's policy of developing players at the expense of success. Gibbs isn't up to it yet and by the time Wenger figures it out we've lost another season...