Not even close, I think Kagawa is way more proved than Hazard.
I bet you want Kagawa to come to Bayern right Elsk.. Admit it..
Not even close, I think Kagawa is way more proved than Hazard.
I bet you want Kagawa to come to Bayern right Elsk.. Admit it..
Really? I hope you're not kidding.
so Chelsea doesn't have a manager and sign a big player
wut
For manu fans: "Kicker saying that a Kagawa deal is all but done."
For manu fans: "Kicker saying that a Kagawa deal is all but done."
"To everyone asking: German media expects Kagawa to sign for Manchester United, that should be what Kicker reports tomorrow."
Bild report that Bayern are very interested in Dzeko (Matías Suarez 2nd option), already in talks with Javi Martínez, furthermore interested in Mathieu.
Well most big clubs are the same. Liverpool - Gerrard. Man U - Evans, Welbeck. Chelsea - Terry. Arsenal - Sczezsny.
yeah it's burried in the garbage article where they warm up all the transferrumours: http://www.bild.de/sport/fussball/bayern-muenchen/plant-so-den-grossangriff-24367408.bild.html (right under his picture)
Elsk I'm thinking of getting a bayern shirt, who are some non dicks who would be good to get on the back?
Isn't Terry a West Ham youth product? He left very early though.
Elsk I'm thinking of getting a bayern shirt, who are some non dicks who would be good to get on the back?
Hope everythings agreed and united get him. Expecting this gif to be used quite a bit next season
Plz be us plz be us plz be us.
Not to get too muppetry but Hazard is said to have informed the clubs involved of his decision over the weekend. If that's the case then I'm sure United will have wanted to accelerated the Kagawa deal.
I hate most of them atm, but Mueller is always cool. Schweini too.
Only dicks are Robben, Ribéry, Breno and maybe Tymo
WTF IS WRONG WITH YOU
Isn't Terry a West Ham youth product? He left very early though.
excluding robben you can go with everyone. even ribery.
personally I would go with gomez or müller
I mean look at him. I think there's not even one person in germany who hates him. he's very likable
Not bad. I guess Contento is leaving then I really liked him.
► Edin Dzeko (26/Manchester City), kostet 25 Mio.
► Javi Martínez (23/Bilbao), kostet 20 Mio.
► Jérémy Mathieu (28, Valencia), kostet 10 Mio.
► Matías Suárez (24/Anderlecht), kostet 8 Mio.
I would prefer to get Suárez rather than Dzeko.
I hate most of them atm, but Mueller is always cool. Schweini too.
Only dicks are Robben, Ribéry, Breno and maybe Tymo
According to the oficial "rules" half of the Barcelona "youth products" actually aren't!
He's an amazing player but still a dick. He fucked everything in the 09/10 season when he got that red card for being an ass. And now he punched Robben (deserved I guees, but still!).
Never liked him that much, tbh. He was a true ass when Real Madrid wanted him, don't you remember? Later in the season when things were going very well he extended but I will never forget the circus he made.
I heard something similar as well. English clubs are restricted from taking on young players unless they are in a certain catchment area, True?
I heard something similar as well. English clubs are restricted from taking on young players unless they are in a certain catchment area, True?
Yeah, just as long as they don't want too much in wages :lolIf nothing else, Hazard story proves United have big money to spend when the right player is available.
Some optimism for us United fans.
Yeah, just as long as they don't want too much in wages :lol
Sorry, but i'll never forget the 07/08 season. His transfer was Bayerns reintroduction in world class football. Yeah he wanted to leave, so what, at least he was honest and afterwards he genuinely fell in love with the club.
I heard something similar as well. English clubs are restricted from taking on young players unless they are in a certain catchment area, True?
- Players up to 14 years can't be signed beyond a radius of 150 kilometers from the club (Liverpool competing in the same environment as Manchester United, City, Everton, and so forth)
- The player is owned by the players home club /first club forever, this is the main reason why any price tag rises up.
- You can't sign players outside the community (150km) until they are 16 years old
I'm not sure it proves anything to get too excited about. It proves we have £30m to spend on one player, but that we can't then go and give him £150k+ a week. Okay sure, Hazard is young and unproven so there's that, if it was somebody else perhaps we would have paid the required wages, but the fact of the matter is this is the going rate, and we can't match it.We'd offered enough and he'd deemed our contract as financially viable as the offers from City and Chelsea, or am I just getting the wrong end of the stick and you mean in general?
Thanks for the information. Been searching for it but its surprising difficult to find.Here's a little run down of Liverpool structure, which mentions the youth policy for England
http://www.aliverpoolthing.com/2011/07/pep-segura-explains-strategy-behind.html
I'm not sure it proves anything to get too excited about. It proves we have £30m to spend on one player, but that we can't then go and give him £150k+ a week. Okay sure, Hazard is young and unproven so there's that, if it was somebody else perhaps we would have paid the required wages, but the fact of the matter is this is the going rate, and we can't match it.
Is the 130,000 after tax?As far as I'm aware, Lampard and Terry are the top earners at Chelsea and are estimated to be earning 130K a week. I don't think Hazard would be getting as much as them. I also remember reading something about Chelsea and how they weren't for handing out ludicrous wages any more to get in line with FFP.
Hazard did say in the end it would come down to where he would play and how often. So I presume UTD and City weren't offering him what he wanted in that regard.
Well, it's unclear at least. I personally think money played a part in his choice (and definitely with regards to his agent), he would have played most weeks for us if we were willing to pay £30m for him.I thought it didn't come down to wages as we'd offered enough and he'd accepted our offer (as well as the one from City and Chelsea) and it came down to where he thought he'd play the most, at least that's what I gathered.
He had three acceptable offers (ie we were prepared to pay him enough to land him) and he chose one of them.
As far as I'm aware, Lampard and Terry are the top earners at Chelsea and are estimated to be earning 130K a week. I don't think Hazard would be getting as much as them. I also remember reading something about Chelsea and how they weren't for handing out ludicrous wages any more to get in line with FFP.
Hazard did say in the end it would come down to where he would play and how often. So I presume UTD and City weren't offering him what he wanted in that regard.
Well, it's unclear at least. I personally think money played a part in his choice (and definitely with regards to his agent), he would have played most weeks for us if we were willing to pay £30m for him.
We couldn't afford wages for Sneijder last year either.
Anyhow, sticking to the fees and not wages, we'll see at the end of the summer just how much we have to spend.
At guess, probably. But truth be told I don't worry about football club finances because the truth of the matter is, nobody has a clue what players are on what amounts of money. It's all speculation and I can't be bothered with it.Is the 130,000 after tax?
No, Torres is allegedly on 200k. I'd bet my life he's not on that.Torres is on 200k lol
That is hilarious.
Well, it's unclear at least. I personally think money played a part in his choice (and definitely with regards to his agent), he would have played most weeks for us if we were willing to pay £30m for him.
We couldn't afford wages for Sneijder last year either.
Anyhow, sticking to the fees and not wages, we'll see at the end of the summer just how much we have to spend.
At guess, probably. But truth be told I don't worry about football club finances because the truth of the matter is, nobody has a clue what players are on what amounts of money. It's all speculation and I can't be bothered with it.
No, Torres is allegedly on 200k. I'd bet my life he's not on that.
Lahm-Dzeko. Good times.
So when did you run your eye over his contract then?Well your fucked then.