Former Bend Studio Developer, Robert Morrison, says "PlayStation needs to:"

Sony has had no problem juggling first and third party output for their consoles in the past. Now third party is still thriving while first party is falling short. I'm not saying Sony should adopt Nintendo's business strategy.
What does that have to do with what I said? My post was meant to explain to you that yes, today Sony's gaming division is making more money than ever — but that revenue isn't coming from their first-party games. So @Generic's comment is coherent.

However, it's not simply a matter of cost that drives them to port games to PC — the goal is to reach an audience that would otherwise never experience their games.
 
As Sony approaches a $Billion yearly on PC??

Will Ferrell Lol GIF by First We Feast


That list is Bryank's wet dream, I'm not sure whom it serves other than people's thinking consoles have to be walled gardens. Devs at Sony asked to be outside, always remember that.
Sony is going to go Intel's route eventually if they keep fucking up.

When they stop listening to fans and start listening only to investors that is the beginning of the end.

I don't think that will happen. Sony is going to wise up and makes some of these changes.

Your precious PC ports are probably safe though. It isn't necessary to end those to fix Sony but it may be necessary to alter how and when they are rolled out.
 
I agree with most of what he said, but not the rewarding the outspoken voices. For one, not everyone with a good idea is an extrovert. Ask everyone's opinions and for everyone to contribute their ideas, regardless of how outspoken they are.

And second, and most importantly, the outspoken bunch have been hurting Western gaming recently. Mainly because they've been harassing those who don't agree with them and injecting their politics into places it doesn't belong. This has led to sales disappointment after sales disappointment.

I get it that yes men are also bad, but just be wary of who those "outspoken" are and what they're trying to push. Is is something to actually make the game better? Or is it just them pushing their biased views into where it doesn't belong?
 
Last edited:
150 million Switch customers, only children customers.
There are a lot of children in the world
You can also add 15 mil of hardcore Nintendo fans (grown up children) to this number

Also in 2024, Nintendo profit is 50%higher than PlayStation.
You know, the last year of an old platform.
It's Sony who is 50% higher in 2024 after they fixed some of their overspending habbits. You probably looking at FY24 which is 2023
And as Nintendo no longer has profit margin on hardware as we saw in last quarter it's unlikely that positions will change any time soon
 
Sony is going to go Intel's route eventually if they keep fucking up.

When they stop listening to fans and start listening only to investors that is the beginning of the end.

I don't think that will happen. Sony is going to wise up and makes some of these changes.

Your precious PC ports are probably safe though. It isn't necessary to end those to fix Sony but it may be necessary to alter how and when they are rolled out.

Only hardcore terminally online fans that make a begging email to Sony to stop going multi platform are seen as the « fans » and are a drop of water in an ocean.

Say games are multi platform, what then? What does that change for the fan? He can still play them on his PlayStation. What's the loss here? Outside that he can't put a piece of plastic on an altar for epeen wars? Sony would rake in so much more cash to make better games as they are getting more and more expensive. All plastic boxes and PC are now nearly identical, a closed OS is only difference. Barely affects how you make a game.
 
Anyone who can read a bit in between the lines understands this correctly. It's really a jab at PS management and to external groups with too much influence.
Seems like you've missed quite a bit of nuance there, you know "between the lines". As English is not my first language, I'll try to do this with some broken and incomplete notes:
  • It appears coworkers are not "listening to each other" properly, which indicates several possible issues, to give two examples: a) work environment is toxic, meaning they don't get along b) superiors are tone deaf and so full of themselves they either can't take criticism or are just plain non receptive to thoughts and ideas from staff
  • "focus groups" appear to be of more value to certain parts of the company than the input from employees. Seemingly suggests marketing research plays a huge role, while devs feel left out of the creative process
But sure, this is just some "jab" at someone in management, nothing to see here.
 
Only hardcore terminally online fans that make a begging email to Sony to stop going multi platform are seen as the « fans » and are a drop of water in an ocean.

Say games are multi platform, what then? What does that change for the fan? He can still play them on his PlayStation. What's the loss here? Outside that he can't put a piece of plastic on an altar for epeen wars? Sony would rake in so much more cash to make better games as they are getting more and more expensive. All plastic boxes and PC are now nearly identical, a closed OS is only difference. Barely affects how you make a game.
To be fair, I think all of us at some point have acted like spoiled brats who dont want our school buddies playing too much with our new video game or Transformer (Jetfire is awesome).

The difference is 99% of us grew out of that attitude at age 9. But like everything in life, you'll rarely get 100% of people converting to adult life (or even reaching teenager life). So you'll always get a portion of the population still acting like they just got a new GIJOE, doesnt want to share and hopes he's the only guy at school who has it.... but this time the guy is now aged 39 or 49 playing video games.
 
Last edited:
Theres enough PC users here like Topher Topher for example... who openly admits that PC still is not as easy of use like consoles...advancements are being made and I think the next closed box gen will deliver. But its not there yet.
Let's not act like saying consoles are more convenient is some kind of confession. It's just the truth, consoles still win hands-down when it comes to ease of use

Calling it an open admission is wild, your agenda couldn't be more obvious
 
Last edited:
This industry was build on exclusives.. Nintendo continues to thrive in this environment as sony did as of last gen... and the only example of a hardware maker not being 100% exclusive is MS and look what happened to their console.. this blatant clear revisionism of the importance of exclusives games as something of little importance and only fuel for console wars is a pathetic port begging strategy by people that dont give a fuck about playstation

I'm glad you really like your "insert brand you have attached to your personality" box. But times HAVE changed. Games are more social than ever and the idea of being limited to what hardware you play any game on just doesn't cut it for either consumers or how the market operates these days, even for single player games. They are too expensive to make to limit your product to a subset of your potential audience.
 
Last edited:
There are a lot of children in the world
You can also add 15 mil of hardcore Nintendo fans (grown up children) to this number


No idea what this is supposed to mean.

It's Sony who is 50% higher in 2024 after they fixed some of their overspending habbits. You probably looking at FY24 which is 2023
And as Nintendo no longer has profit margin on hardware as we saw in last quarter it's unlikely that positions will change any time soon

"Operating profit amounted to Yen 414.8 billion (€2.52 billion),"


– Ordinary profit this period – 372.3 billion yen

So, FY23 had Nintendo profits 50% higher than Playstation, FY24( the last year of Switch with a big drop in sales), Playstation managed 11% more profit.

Switch 2 is breaking all records, PS5 expects a decline in sales, PS5 is at a loss, only the Pro is profitable.
Champ, your case for Sony having nothing to learn from Nintendo is looking weak and it reeks of fanboyism.
 
Seems like you've missed quite a bit of nuance there, you know "between the lines". As English is not my first language, I'll try to do this with some broken and incomplete notes:
  • It appears coworkers are not "listening to each other" properly, which indicates several possible issues, to give two examples: a) work environment is toxic, meaning they don't get along b) superiors are tone deaf and so full of themselves they either can't take criticism or are just plain non receptive to thoughts and ideas from staff
  • "focus groups" appear to be of more value to certain parts of the company than the input from employees. Seemingly suggests marketing research plays a huge role, while devs feel left out of the creative process


This is exactly what I meant. The tweet is very clear in this regard.

. They are too expensive to make to limit your product to a subset of your potential audience.


So, instead of QUESTIONING the core premise, we accept the fallacy and operate according to false beliefs. WHY are games too expensive? They aren't any bigger or better than games last gen so there is a problem right there, a problem that nobody seems to care enough to tackle.

Of course, it's very easy to blame intangibles like "the market!" "the budgets" instead of discussing lack of proper management and competency, something the guy in the tweet is calling out.
 
And yet Days Gone looked better and played better on my PC. Why is exclusivity something we are demanding?
It doesn't matter that the game can run better on PC. Do you think Nintendo care about their games running better if they do native ports ? As long as people are fine with how the game runs on the console, it is good enough for Nintendo and it builds on their ecosystem, which is selling a shit ton of hardware and games. This is all a virtuous circle, which Sony and MS have totally exited now.
 
Last edited:
Switch 2 is breaking all records, PS5 expects a decline in sales, PS5 is at a loss, only the Pro is profitable.
Champ, your case for Sony having nothing to learn from Nintendo is looking weak and it reeks of fanboyism.


Your last words are... kind of ironic, to say the least.

Sony cannot replicate Nintendo business model the same way Nintendo couldnt keep up with the tech race. These are polar opposite strategies. The only thing that Sony should learn from Nintendo is protecting their IPs better, something they have been doing till 2020, when things started to fall apart.

Nintendo's strengths are also its weaknesses. They rely EVERYTHING on the legacy of its IPs. The day Pokemon or Mario aren't fan favorites, they are doomed. It's a strategy that demands no mistakes or else they could collapse in one single generation.
 
Your last words are... kind of ironic, to say the least.

Sony cannot replicate Nintendo business model the same way Nintendo couldnt keep up with the tech race. These are polar opposite strategies. The only thing that Sony should learn from Nintendo is protecting their IPs better, something they have been doing till 2020, when things started to fall apart.

Nintendo's strengths are also its weaknesses. They rely EVERYTHING on the legacy of its IPs. The day Pokemon or Mario aren't fan favorites, they are doomed. It's a strategy that demands no mistakes or else they could collapse in one single generation.
Nah, I probably have played on PS5 as much or more than Switch, I have all 3 consoles and play them all.

Nintendo rely on making great games consistently that appeal to many different ages, it's been a while since I saw the classic "Nintendo is doomed" meme in action, it's comical. "Pokemon will stop being popular any day now, same as Mario, I know it's been 40 years but any day now, you'll see".
 
What kind of qualifier is "meaningful"? I suppose if you didn't live through that period games like Gran Turismo, Twisted Metal, Warhawk, Socom, GoW, Sly, Killzone, Ratchet, Jak, Siphon Filter the entire 989 studios line of sports games wouldn't be meaningful.

If you didn't live through that period then you wouldn't have anything to compare the current situation with and so you wouldn't be so overly negative on the current gen.

The funnier thing, is that the biggest franchises birthed on PS3 are all pretty much dead. Uncharted, Resistance, Infamous, LBP, MotorStorm are all dead. Even the darling TLOU has a grand total of 2 games in 12 years.

Sony routinely goes back to their old franchises, so I wouldn't call any of these dead. Rather they're on hiatus while those devs work on newer IP. If Sony had forced those devs to continue working on those same IP, many like you would still be bitching that Sony is just making sequels to the same tired IP.

I'm not seeing how they can win at this game when the "fans" like you would bitch, moan and whine regardless of what their first party output was.
 
So, FY23 had Nintendo profits 50% higher than Playstation, FY24( the last year of Switch with a big drop in sales), Playstation managed 11% more profit.
So Nintendo is not more profitable than Sony

Switch 2 is breaking all records, PS5 expects a decline in sales, PS5 is at a loss, only the Pro is profitable.
We have Q2 results for Nintendo - despite record sales of hardware profit increased by 4% that wholely can be attributed to increase in software sales.
Sw2 doesn't have profit margin of Sw1 (confirmed by Nintendo) so further decline is Sw1 sales will further eat up profits and if launch quarter couldn't move a needle it will be extremely hard to change situation in subsequent quarters

Champ, your case for Sony having nothing to learn from Nintendo is looking weak and it reeks of fanboyism.
They are in different market, Sony themselves doesn't treat Nin as major competition. Nintendo is children (family) and Sony is young adult+, they have different audience, different approaches, different games/genres and now even approach to gaming. Young adult+ heavily drifting towards social heavy live service games (Fortnite, Genshin etc) and Sony follows trend. Those games are too heavy for children so Nintendo stays old-school. It's not like Nin do better or do things more correctly - it's just different companies concentrates on different markets

It's your will to clash them in the same bin and "advices" as if Nintendo superior does really reeks of fanboism and lack of knowledge.
 
I'm glad you really like your "insert brand you have attached to your personality" box. But times HAVE changed. Games are more social than ever and the idea of being limited to what hardware you play any game on just doesn't cut it for either consumers or how the market operates these days, even for single player games. They are too expensive to make to limit your product to a subset of your potential audience.
Saying things wont make it true .. I have no attachment to any brand and a quick search of my post history will tell you this ... the only agenda I see is people that dont give a fuck about a brand port begging and doing revision history of what is important and what is not ..

And if the times changed thats ok .. as I said .. you can change strategy to be a software seller primarily instead of hardware and a closed ecosystem...

What I will not accept is the bullshit being pushed that exclusives have no importance, never did, and the obvious way was always multiplat, and that this change of strategy will have zero effects on the hardware business or quality of output
 
Theres enough PC users here like Topher Topher for example... who openly admits that PC still is not as easy of use like consoles...advancements are being made and I think the next closed box gen will deliver. But its not there yet.

The rumored next gen closed box from MS is not a PC though. It might have PC hardware in a MS branded box, but if it's a single configuration, all drivers and SW will be tailored for it and you will not have to meddle with it and run to forums for advice on how to solve the hundredth problem that just popped up.
 
You literally made it sound like admitting consoles are convenient was some brave act of honesty

If that's not pushing a narrative, I don't know what is lol
Mate Im not pushing a narrative.. you can check a lot of threads here.. we have multiple PCMR users saying that pc is as easy of use as consoles, as plug and play as consoles.. and its not a few.

You should question them about this opinion.. this is spreading a "narrative"
 
The rumored next gen closed box from MS is not a PC though. It might have PC hardware in a MS branded box, but if it's a single configuration, all drivers and SW will be tailored for it and you will not have to meddle with it and run to forums for advice on how to solve the hundredth problem that just popped up.
Oh Im not even talking about the new Xbox
.. I thinking more ahead like a new Steam machine with a new steam OS.. of course all Im talking is highly speculative... like most things we talk here
 
Mate Im not pushing a narrative.. you can check a lot of threads here.. we have multiple PCMR users saying that pc is as easy of use as consoles, as plug and play as consoles.. and its not a few.

You should question them about this opinion.. this is spreading a "narrative"
This was never about whether people think PC is plug and play. It's about you framing a basic fact as an 'open admission,' like someone finally cracked under pressure. That kind of wording isn't neutral, it's loaded. It subtly paints convenience on consoles as something people are reluctant to acknowledge, and you know that. So don't play the 'what agenda?' card when you're clearly setting a tone
 
Switch 2 is breaking all records, PS5 expects a decline in sales, PS5 is at a loss, only the Pro is profitable.
Champ, your case for Sony having nothing to learn from Nintendo is looking weak and it reeks of fanboyism.
Sounds about right for a 5/yo console?
 
Last edited:
This was never about whether people think PC is plug and play. It's about you framing a basic fact as an 'open admission,' like someone finally cracked under pressure. That kind of wording isn't neutral, it's loaded. It subtly paints convenience on consoles as something people are reluctant to acknowledge, and you know that. So don't play the 'what agenda?' card when you're clearly setting a tone
LoL.. I somehow struck a nerve in you ... so think what you want mate.. you should chill though..its not good for you this anger
 
Last edited:
The elephant in the room that everyone making this kind of comment ignores is that Sony is also doing extremely well. In fact, they're more successful than ever.

Basing your arguments solely on Nintendo as if they were the only ones achieving success is, at the very least, ignorance.
But Nintendo exclusivity principle and no pc port has bigger and long term success in the long run.
 
Ah, the 'you mad bro?' defense. Timeless. Still doesn't make your original point any less loaded or your framing any less transparent
Nah.. you sound super calm and not overreacting at all to a single post made days ago in a 5 page thread lol ... big narrative pusher.. 1 post lol ... get help
 
So Nintendo is not more profitable than Sony
They weren't in the final Switch year but were the previous years, it's not complicated.

They are in different market, Sony themselves doesn't treat Nin as major competition. Nintendo is children (family) and Sony is young adult+, they have different audience, different approaches, different games/genres and now even approach to gaming. Young adult+ heavily drifting towards social heavy live service games (Fortnite, Genshin etc) and Sony follows trend. Those games are too heavy for children so Nintendo stays old-school. It's not like Nin do better or do things more correctly - it's just different companies concentrates on different markets

It's your will to clash them in the same bin and "advices" as if Nintendo superior does really reeks of fanboism and lack of knowledge.

The fact that you think children aren't playing Fortnite is hilarious.

I don't quite get what your point is, it seems to be that you are annoyed that the ex-bend guy criticised Sony for their GaaS Bullshit and that Sony have nothing to learn from Nintendo because Nintendo is for kids whereas Playstation is for big men and anyone who suggests otherwise is a stinky fanboy.
Is that it?
 
Nah.. you sound super calm and not overreacting at all to a single post made days ago in a 5 page thread lol ... big narrative pusher.. 1 post lol ... get help
Let's be clear: nobody's 'overreacting' to a single post. I responded to how you framed something in a way that clearly wasn't neutral. You used 'openly admits' to describe a basic fact, as if it's something shameful or reluctantly acknowledged. That's subtle narrative framing, whether you want to own it or not.

Now instead of addressing that, you're pretending this is about me being emotional or obsessed, because it's easier to make it personal than to back your wording. Thats weak. Transparent. And a textbook way to avoid accountability for what you actually wrote

And the 'get help' bit? Youre not even trying to argue anymore, you are just tossing lazy insults because you ran out of substance. That might fly if someone really was melting down, but in this case, I've been nothing but clear, direct, and on-point. You're the one spiraling into playground jabs

So yeah, nice try. But if anyone here needs to do a little self reflection, it's probably the guy who got called on something, and now thinks sarcasm counts as damage control
 
I agree 100%.

And let me just add, remove woke agenda particularly twisted gender ideology and twisted DEI on Sony PS games. Spider man 2 and TLOU 2 are so woke infested and sadly it also looks like Intergalactic and GOY will be the same.
This x 100.
I am playing Spider-Man 2 rn and it is insufferable how woke it is from time to time. I like the game other than that, but it can be real cringe fest. They need to tone it down or they are going to lose more and more fans.
 
All I can say for sure is PlayStation doesn't feel like the PlayStation I loved in the past, so I'm done with them. Their direction doesn't resonate with me; maybe it does with Gen Z and maybe they will find continued success, though I do feel like Concord was the canary in the coal mine and they are heading for danger.
 
As a consumer I want those games on PC. But strictly looking at this from a business perspective, with the aim of making more money.....put those games on PC DAY AND DATE!
 
If you didn't live through that period then you wouldn't have anything to compare the current situation with and so you wouldn't be so overly negative on the current gen.



Sony routinely goes back to their old franchises, so I wouldn't call any of these dead. Rather they're on hiatus while those devs work on newer IP. If Sony had forced those devs to continue working on those same IP, many like you would still be bitching that Sony is just making sequels to the same tired IP.

I'm not seeing how they can win at this game when the "fans" like you would bitch, moan and whine regardless of what their first party output was.
Straw man arguments and goal post moving. It's not your job to worry about Sony and what fans like me might bitch about and I'll continue to do so if I feel like it.
 
Yeah, anyone in the know agrees, you have to keep your titles exclusive if you want your platform business to do well

As a customer, I am happy Sony is putting its shit on PC, but as a platform holder, this starts them off on a one way path
 
All I can say for sure is PlayStation doesn't feel like the PlayStation I loved in the past, so I'm done with them. Their direction doesn't resonate with me; maybe it does with Gen Z and maybe they will find continued success, though I do feel like Concord was the canary in the coal mine and they are heading for danger.
To be fair, they did cancel a load after that so did at least react, I'm not so optimistic they'll make the right decisions now but here's hoping they keep going for their GaaS hit without devoting 90% of resources towards it and develop more single-player games, more AA games and more Japanese games.
 
This x 100.
I am playing Spider-Man 2 rn and it is insufferable how woke it is from time to time. I like the game other than that, but it can be real cringe fest. They need to tone it down or they are going to lose more and more fans.
What is "insufferable"?
Should we pretend that black people and gay people don't exist?
Why would it bother you?
 
Top Bottom