Fox officially sets Deadpool movie.(Spoilers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ripclawe

Banned
How many damn spoilers could THR fit into one article? This many.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i605e3e8798d54f48728c330741965d57

Fresh off the muscular performance of "X-Men Origins: Wolverine" at the boxoffice, Fox has thrown into development a spinoff featuring Deadpool, the wise-cracking mercenary played in the film by Ryan Reynolds.

Reynolds is attached to reprise the character for what for now is simply being called "Deadpool." Lauren Shuler Donner and Marvel Studios would act as producers.

Deadpool is known as "the merc with a mouth," a character that under Reynolds lived up to his billing in "Wolverine"
until the end, when the movie deviated from the comic book persona, imbuing him with several superpowers and sewing his mouth shut.

It is understood that Reynolds
would regain the ability to mouth off,
with the movie going back to the roots of the character known for his slapstick tone and propensity to break the fourth wall.
The character also was disfigured in "Wolverine," though it's unclear at this time how much the studio would want to mess with Reynolds' handsome mug.

The project is out to writers.

Fox considered a "Deadpool" spinoff early in "Wolverine's" development process, which is why it cast Reynolds.
The actor was brought back in the month before the movie's release to shoot one of two "Easter egg" scenes that appeared after the end credits

More from Variety

Fox is also in the formative stages of a "Wolverine" sequel that will encompass the samurai storyline that was hinted at as Wolverine sat in a bar in Japan as the film concluded (Daily Variety, May 4).

Separately, Fox is developing "Magneto," a film about the X-Men villain with a script by Shelton Turner, and "X-Men: First Class," which Josh Schwartz is penning.
 
So Fox is basically saying, "we f*cked up Deadpool in the Wolverine movie"

I doubt it will be any good even with fixes to the character, they'll just get some hack ass director and writer.
 
Why would they completely fuck up the character and then try to make a faithful movie based on the comic? How does that make any sense?
 
do want for sure.


I wish i would have stayed for the easter eggs....if anyone has links to them can they pm them to me...both of them lol.
 
quadriplegicjon said:
uh..possible wolverine spoiler:
wasnt his head cut off in the wolverine movie?

In one of the extended endings, deadpools hand crawls towards his severed head, then it shushes the audience.
 
LakeEarth said:
Why would they completely fuck up the character and then try to make a faithful movie based on the comic? How does that make any sense?

Honestly the 'Weapon XI' Deadpool is just a stopgap between 'Wade Wilson -><- Deadpool' it only takes liberties with his origins so far as it justfies the end fight sequence. I'm sure all of his other 'powers' get burnt out post Wolverine Origins.

And DO WANT. I'm holding out hope that it's better than Wolverine. Sure it's Fox, but that doesn't mean all hope is lost.
 
I got a '10 seconds of credits, face to Stryker walking, and the military apprehending him for the death of that General' and 'Deadpools head telling the audience to stop whinning about how they ruined Deadpool' (I'm giving them entirely too much credit here, I'm sure) after the real credits.
 
Zen said:
Honestly the 'Weapon XI' Deadpool is just a stopgap between 'Wade Wilson -><- Deadpool' it only takes liberties with his origins so far as it justfies the end fight sequence. I'm sure all of his other 'powers' get burnt out post Wolverine Origins.

And DO WANT. I'm holding out hope that it's better than Wolverine. Sure it's Fox, but that doesn't mean all hope is lost.

That's exactly what it means.
 
I heard that as long as Fox makes X-Men movies, they keeps the rights to them. If that's true then I expect to see Fox run the entire X-Men franchise into the ground. And even then they'll probably still make movies just for the sake of keeping the rights.
 
don't reboot anything. keep the same Deadpool concept from the wolverine movie.

Premise would be fucked from the get go. Do your worse, Fox
 
Blader5489 said:
That's exactly what it means.

Fox still had X-Men and X-Men 2, and Wolverine is at least... better... than X-Men 3. Granted that was because of Bryan Singer (that X1/2 were good).

Averon said:
I heard that as long as Fox makes X-Men movies, they keeps the rights to them. If that's true then I expect to see Fox run the entire X-Men franchise into the ground. And even then they'll probably still make movies just for the sake of keeping the rights.

True enough...
 
quadriplegicjon said:
uh..possible wolverine spoiler:
wasnt his head cut off in the wolverine movie?
hes got a healing factor much stronger than wolverine. Hopefully they use the ending to properly retcon wade to his old handsome self
 
Parallax said:
hes got a healing factor much stronger than wolverine. Hopefully they use the ending to properly retcon wade to his old handsome self
Deadpool wouldn't be the same if he didn't have a disfigured face. That being said, dude needs a mouth.
 
If they put Reynolds in the bloody costume, have him wisecracking, and breaking the fourth wall constantly, I'll give it a chance.

If he even slightly resembles his Weapon XI incarnation in any way, shape, or form, then Fox can once and for all go fuck itself. I'm drawing the fucking line here. If they fuck up a solo Deadpool movie, they'll never get a dime from me again.
 
Seen it.

df7a9bde9d88060b3ef7dbfe695aafad4ef55902.jpg
 
smh, they completely ruined the character with just 5 minutes of screen time, I can't even imagine how much damage they gonna manage to make with a 90 minutes turd.
 
Fuck off Fox. I have no faith in them at all in the comic movies. Maybe even movies in general? I dont know.
 
Parallax said:
hes got a healing factor much stronger than wolverine. Hopefully they use the ending to properly retcon wade to his old handsome self
OOh! Ohhh! I know!

Weapon XI grows a new mute head, and the original head grows a new body! Then Deadpool can face off against The Dead Pool for an entire movie!!!!!
 
From what I understand what they did with "Weapon XI" in the film, why didn't they just make him a clone born in a jar or something?

They could have easily had Reynolds survive for another movie/spinoff without having to retcon or explain away all the changes they made for the FINAL EPIC BOSS MONSTER SCENE, and it wouldn't be any more farfetched than anything else in the Xmen universe they've crafted.

It also would've allowed them to keep his face, if that was their intention. Just poorly conceived all around.
 
LakeEarth said:
Why would they completely fuck up the character and then try to make a faithful movie based on the comic? How does that make any sense?
i just...don't understand.
 
Seeing as how Reynolds expressed disappointment with how Deadpool was handled in Wolverine, I doubt he'd sign up to this if he didn't like it. I also don't believe he's in any contract with Fox, either. So those are two good signs...for now.

And I highly doubt this will have tie-in to the Wolverine movie. It'll be a more faithful comic book representation of the character.
 
gamerecks said:
In one of the extended endings, deadpools hand crawls towards his severed head, then it shushes the audience.

:lol My god this movie is even stupider than I thought.
 
Fox is also in the formative stages of a "Wolverine" sequel that will encompass the samurai storyline that was hinted at as Wolverine sat in a bar in Japan as the film concluded (Daily Variety, May 4).

Separately, Fox is developing "Magneto," a film about the X-Men villain with a script by Shelton Turner, and "X-Men: First Class," which Josh Schwartz is penning.

Oh man. Why? Goddamn it. That's too much. Way beyond too much.
 
Why on Earth does Fox own the rights to Deadpool? Ughhh, I thought Marvel just sold them the license to X-Men characters which Deadpool really isn't.
 
Not sure but in the movie the project where they stole DNA from the others was called Deadpool and the actual "mutant" was called Weapon XI.


Just sayin
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom