DoctorWho said:Altivia seems to get around more. I say she's the better of the two. Hell, I expect it to be a plotline.
for reals.Solo said:I beg to differ. Fauxlivia is more outwardly sexualized without a doubt, but look how little it took for Olivia to hop between the sheets ("I want to know how it feels"). Her plain, business attire, no frills day to day look is but a cover for the sex machine she is between closed doors. No wonder Peter is weaponized.
ivysaur12 said:Next week's could be great, but child acting is a real deal killer. Let's hope we don't get Across the Sea'd.
Dr. Pangloss said:So, it doesn't matter where she is. Could this happen all over again? Only thing I can think of is to kill her. Why hasn't Fringe division shut it down on other side. They probably have more authority to do it.
Solo said:I beg to differ. Fauxlivia is more outwardly sexualized without a doubt, but look how little it took for Olivia to hop between the sheets ("I want to know how it feels"). Her plain, business attire, no frills day to day look is but a cover for the sex machine she is between closed doors. No wonder Peter is weaponized.
mm04 said:lol nice description, Solo. I just bought season 1 and 2 on blu-ray and Olivia was a freak with John Scott. She's pretty much been a cold fish, since. I guess she's been "activated", now.
water_wendi said:Sad ending.
Why? Shooting her would be really out of character for all of the main characters, I think. If they brought in some other dude like in the episode where Peter is infected with that virus in the office building, maybe.OptimoPeach said:And I'm seriously disappointed that one of them didn't just shoot that crusty old lady. Not being facetious here. Half of Brooklyn vs a city block? How about a single geriatric shut-in?
Thats when we discover that the First People are the main antagonists of the series, manipulating both realities into a war so that they can wipe each other out. When the two realities and their civilizations are destroyed the First People can reclaim what is theirs.OptimoPeach said:I was honestly half-expecting Walter to do the deed for obvious reasons. NO! I REFUSE TO BE WALTERNATE and so on. But I guess it seems like they're trying more for WE'RE REALLY NOT ALL THAT DIFFERENT, UNIFIED BY A MUTUAL DILEMMA, WE CAN BE FRIENDS, etc
In our typical data stream we dont usually see the adult 18-34 ratings for Friday nights we usually see them only for Sunday-Thursday. But I saw last nights 18-34 numbers and while Fringe was third in adults 18-49, it was tops for the hour in adults 18-34 among the English language broadcast networks with a 1.2 rating (Univision was #1 for the hour with a 1.4 rating).
That 1.2 might not seem like much, but it was 20% greater than its closest competition (several networks had a 1.0 adults 18-34 rating). Indeed among the English language broadcasters, it trailed only its Fox sibling Kitchen Nightmares (1.4 rating) for the entire night. Adults 18-34 are even more scarce than adults 35-49, and the harder it is for advertisers to reach a demographic, the more valued that demographic is by advertisers.
Make no mistake, those arent monster numbers. By comparison, last Sunday Family Guy had a 3.8 rating with adults 18-34 and on Tuesday Glee had a 4.5 adults 18-34 rating. At the small levels were talking it really isnt anything for a Fringe fan to get excited about, especially since Fox knows that it actually can (and does) do better with cheaper unscripted programming.
We occasionally see blathering about how advertisers pay more for scripted programming. However, weve never seen any analysis that suggests that those premiums would offset even the ratings difference between an unscripted 1.7 adults 18-49 rating and a scripted 1.5 rating. And at those levels, you can be sure there is absolutely no chance any premiums offset the much higher production costs for scripted programming.
But its at least a feather in Fringes cap and at this point it needs all the feathers it can get.
PhoncipleBone said:Ratings up slightly to a 1.5.
http://insidetv.ew.com/2011/02/19/fringe-ratings-improve/
Olivia's excited about the Daytona 500 this Sunday on Fox it seems.Keyser Soze said:
PhoncipleBone said:Ratings up slightly to a 1.5.
http://insidetv.ew.com/2011/02/19/fringe-ratings-improve/
Do people not remember how the show started? It was her banging a co-worker in some shoddy motel off the side of the highway. She's not one to shy away from physical contact.Solo said:I beg to differ. Fauxlivia is more outwardly sexualized without a doubt, but look how little it took for Olivia to hop between the sheets ("I want to know how it feels"). Her plain, business attire, no frills day to day look is but a cover for the sex machine she is between closed doors. No wonder Peter is weaponized.
close to the edge said:I just read a review of The Firefly and according to the comments, the Observer says to Peter something like "It must be hard to be a father". Now that Fauxlivia is pregnant, he probably foreshadows her pregnancy, which is pretty cool.
Future said:They are draggin on the Peter and Real-livia thing too long.
Keyser Soze said:I don't think so. Ourlivia has only been back for six episode, and one of them was a "OverThere", so they have gone form unable to look at each other to putting the beef in the taco in about 5 episode
Veidt said:I like that.
Come to think of it, I like you. We should have sex.
Both from episode 8 of this season, around the 30min mark if you want specifics.close to the edge said:@ Sentry: From which episodes are those GIFs?
GDJustin had it right:BoboBrazil said:So Peter had sex with both versions of Olivia. I wonder if they both have sex the same way and if their pussy feels the same.
GDJustin said:If him and Olivia do ever hook up he's probably going to be really disappointed, because BOlivia is probably way more wild in the sack. I bet regular Olivia just lays there :lol
Exclamation-One said:GDJustin had it right:
.GqueB. said:God Im getting tired of this Olivia/Peter crap. First its so obvious and annoying. I hate HATE HATTATATAEEEE proximity infatuations in movies and tv shows. Happens on pretty much every show. They work together and theyre both attractive so they have to eventually start fucking. It seems that every writer defaults to that.
BUT
What makes it more offensive here is the fact that every case is forced to relate to their shit.
"I want what these two old people have"
"He knew she wasnt his love just by looking at her and you couldnt I HATE you"
blahblahblah. Its so contrived. STOP MUCKING UP MY SHOW. I hope next week tries to explain this so I can stop hating it. Like their being together is keeping the very fabric of the universe together which is why Walter wants to badly for them to work. SOMEthing. What theyre doing now is just offensive. When the cases are actually being created around some sort of will they wont they storyline youre probably doing it wrong.
BoboBrazil said:Yeah, Bolivia probably likes anal and swallowing.
TheOMan said:Did anybody else notice the following?
The people that fell off the balcony spelled Fringe when they were laing on the sidewalk.
Loved the name of the other apartment building "Schrodinger" a reference to Schrodinger's Cat.
Rosencrantz building - the absurd where probabilities don't make sense.
I think Walter is turning into Walternate, I hope I'm wrong!
GTFO. Old woman was excellent casting.wetwired said:Did any one else notice how truly bad the old woman's acting was? It was really distracting in what was supposed to be a emotional scene.
wetwired said:Did any one else notice how truly bad the old woman's acting was? It was really distracting in what was supposed to be a emotional scene.