Can Finance-GAF tell me if this is a huge deal or not? This seems to be the crux of his argument for big bank deregulation.
Everyone else answered, and in this context, it's the fact that Hillary is equated as too conservative (whether this is true or not), has a Bernie/Warren side of the party that is wary of her (once again, who knows if that matters or not, the anti Trump vote may matter more than a pro Hillary one), and is seen as in the pockets/in cahoots with wall street (once again, doesn't matter if it's true or not, its the optics of it). This will only embolden all these points.
Never thought I'd say this, but if this guy gets picked, I will probably just vote 3rd party. Maybe the system needs to be burned down.
Voting 3rd party won't do that lol.Never thought I'd say this, but if this guy gets picked, I will probably just vote 3rd party. Maybe the system needs to be burned down.
In a letter to Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen, Comptroller of the Currency Thomas Curry and FDIC Chair Martin Gruenberg, Kaine argues that it is unfair for these large banks to be required to calculate and report their liquidity ― a critical measure of risk ― on a daily basis. Kaine wants to change that reporting to once a month.
Kaine and his coauthors do draw an exception to this principle for systemically important banks ― a term that usually means the six largest banks in the country: JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Wells Fargo and Citigroup. These should be regulated closely. Firms controlling over $400 billion, not so much.
This is so silly to me.Never thought I'd say this, but if this guy gets picked, I will probably just vote 3rd party. Maybe the system needs to be burned down.
As a former regulatory liason for two giant banks, it's a good change of the rule.
Daily liquidity calculations are super arduous, cost lots of money, are not horribly accurate and don't offer much view into the bank that monthly calcs would provide.
But the optics of this are horrid because most americans are just going to see "going easy on wall st"
And that will help anyone... how?Never thought I'd say this, but if this guy gets picked, I will probably just vote 3rd party. Maybe the system needs to be burned down.
As a former regulatory liason for two giant banks, it's a good change of the rule.
Daily liquidity calculations are super arduous, cost lots of money, are not horribly accurate and don't offer much view into the bank that monthly calcs would provide.
But the optics of this are horrid because most americans are just going to see "going easy on wall st"
Never thought I'd say this, but if this guy gets picked, I will probably just vote 3rd party. Maybe the system needs to be burned down.
Compromise. Pure, unadulterated racism or back to 2008.
Back to 2008 is still better.
Because Trump is in the business of telling people what they want to hear. He has no firm policy positions on anything beyond building wall, and has contradicted his own stated positions sometimes in the same day!It doesn't seem to have changed his rhetoric... who the fuck cares about facts, anyway?
As a minority, thank you for wanting to burn all my rights down
The VP barely does anything. I would rather keep the power players like Warren in the Senate and have Stavridis be SoS or something. Kaine is a perfectly acceptable VP who can help lock up Virginia, speaks fluent spanish, and can help with blue collar white men.
How do you feel about your guy wanting to axe Dodd-Frank?
As a minority, thank you for wanting to burn all my rights down
Yeah, actually reading this, can anyone tell me what exactly he is pledging to do? The thread title implies he wants complete deregulation for banks. The actual letter he signed seems to say he wants to change a report timing.
Rights are important, but sometimes I feel like they're a distraction from far bigger issues such as global warming and consolidation of wealth.
Voting 3rd party will make it more likely that Trump wins.Never thought I'd say this, but if this guy gets picked, I will probably just vote 3rd party. Maybe the system needs to be burned down.
Rights are important, but sometimes I feel like they're a distraction from far bigger issues such as global warming and consolidation of wealth.
Canada has 5 gigantic national banks and their system's more stable than ours is.TBH, I'm not well versed enough on banking policy to judge this proposal on the merits. But this hardly seems worthy of the freak-outs that it's causing.
Kaine doesn't believe that large banks carry inherently more risks to the financial system merely by virtue of being large, and wants to reserve the most burdensome regulations for those banks which do. That's debatable, but it doesn't make him a dirty corporatist.
?Wow.
Not even elected yet and I can already see how a Hilary admin will be a huge downgrade from Obama.
It means it looks bad. In reality his opinion doesn't mean much as far as his actual power to make this happen. He will actually have less say on things as VP than he does as a legislator. Biden was more conservative than President Obama too. But it does hurt Clinton's image among progressives (especially with the money she's received from wallstreet), and there's always the risk of something happening to Hillary Clinton.I'm gonna be that guy.
What does "optics" mean in the context I'm constantly seeing it in on GAF politics? Where did it originate from, I've never even heard news sources use it in their vocabulary.
Oh.Rights are important, but sometimes I feel like they're a distraction from far bigger issues such as global warming and consolidation of wealth.
Does it matter who you can marry or which bathroom you can enter when your existence is threatened?
As a minority, thank you for wanting to burn all my rights down
As a minority as well, please stop with this garbage line of thinking. Stop trying to belittle and guilt people into voting for your chosen candidate; they have the freedom to vote third party if they so choose. You do realize not just white people are looking at other options, right?Seriously, talk about white privilege.
Rights are important, but sometimes I feel like they're a distraction from far bigger issues such as global warming and consolidation of wealth.
Interesting, thank you.As a former regulatory liason for two giant banks, it's a good change of the rule.
Daily liquidity calculations are super arduous, cost lots of money, are not horribly accurate and don't offer much view into the bank that monthly calcs would provide.
But the optics of this are horrid because most americans are just going to see "going easy on wall st"
We need a third party system.
Rights are important, but sometimes I feel like they're a distraction from far bigger issues such as global warming and consolidation of wealth.
Does it matter who you can marry or which bathroom you can enter when your existence is threatened?
As a former regulatory liason for two giant banks, it's a good change of the rule.
Daily liquidity calculations are super arduous, cost lots of money, are not horribly accurate and don't offer much view into the bank that monthly calcs would provide.
But the optics of this are horrid because most americans are just going to see "going easy on wall st"
As a former regulatory liason for two giant banks, it's a good change of the rule.
Daily liquidity calculations are super arduous, cost lots of money, are not horribly accurate and don't offer much view into the bank that monthly calcs would provide.
But the optics of this are horrid because most americans are just going to see "going easy on wall st"
Hillary is gonna pivot to the right to grab those centrists and some republicans who hate Trump too.
The current system forces people to compromise instead of getting to select from a list of vanity candidates. People don't like having to compromise.Just a third one? What if that third party is the tea party? You need a system that doesn't fuck you over by presenting less than a handful of viable options. But hey, since the people in power belong to either of these two parties, when is this really ever going to change for you?
Fuck the supreme court and all the people (women and minorities and LBGT) the GOP would fuck over amirite?
It means it doesn't look good. Hillary has been claiming to be tough on the big banks.
I guess the dems advocating for a higher minimum wage and worker's rights is just them appeasing the corporate overlords!
Trump already ruined that talking point when he picked Pence who also supports the TPP. And if we believe Donald Jr. It's going to be Pence whos in charge of domestic and foreign policy lol.
Sooooo this whole story is just more fear mongering aimed at Bernie fans?