OP's a bit unclear, would you have fucked her if you were more sober?
this! so much this.
OP's a bit unclear, would you have fucked her if you were more sober?
What does your post even mean?this! so much this.
Well sometimes you just want a sympathetic ear more than anything else.So post it on GAF. Oh please.
OP's a bit unclear, would you have fucked her if you were more sober?
OP's a bit unclear, would you have fucked her if you were more sober?
Rape is rape, regardless of the reason for saying no.this! so much this.
Rape is a type of sexual assault and the laws definitions differ from place to place. It's still classified as rape.
Good circulation.One thing I fail to grasp is how, if OP was so fucked up and slipping in and out of conciseness did he sustain an erection. I have trouble holding one when I want too if I'm literally pass out drunk.
We also don't know for sure how much he actually did. It could be, that she just rode a pile of flappy.Well in the UK it is not classified as rape. Rape specially means the forced penetration of a penis into an orifice. Not that it matters but just saying it isn't classified as rape.
One thing I fail to grasp is how, if OP was so fucked up and slipping in and out of conciseness did he sustain an erection. I have trouble holding one when I want too if I'm literally pass out drunk.
OP's a bit unclear, would you have fucked her if you were more sober?
Does it matter?
Wait, so I don't have to wait until my girlfriend is in the mood anymore? I mean, she'd fuck me in a particular state of mind, but not all the time. But if it happens anyway, she'll be fine with it? Cool.
yes. I'm trying to visualize the situation and it's very important to know whether to picture the rapist as a hot chick or not.
The fuck????? how'd you manage to extrapolate that nonsense out of my simple question.
Well in the UK it is not classified as rape. Rape specially means the forced penetration of a penis into an orifice. Not that it matters but just saying it isn't classified as rape.
One thing I fail to grasp is how, if OP was so fucked up and slipping in and out of conciseness did he sustain an erection. I have trouble holding one when I want too if I'm literally pass out drunk.
Why does it fucking matter if the girl is hot or not?
Some people seem to be having a hard time differentiating between a fantasy about a dominating hot chick 'abusing' them and what actually happened to the OP... being raped.
Correcting other people is fine but some of the reactions to his ignorance are far more disturbing than anything else I've read. No need for the "Are you fucking serious?" type of posts repeated ad nauseum. It's not supporting the OP and not helping those displaying ignorance whatsoever.
Urgh.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Xhk6HsewTw
Technically IF you said no and you wernt capable of telling her ''NO'' in a clear way, then yes she sis rape you.
Though if you were that drunk that you couldn't sit up and tell her in a loud clear voice ''NO I DONT WANT TO HAVE SEX'' , If you were so drunk you could even do that then it would of been impossible to get aroused, if you did get aroused then in my book you were soba enough to tell her ''NO'' in a clear way
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Xhk6HsewTw
Technically IF you said no and you wernt capable of telling her ''NO'' in a clear way, then yes she sis rape you.
Though if you were that drunk that you couldn't sit up and tell her in a loud clear voice ''NO I DONT WANT TO HAVE SEX'' , If you were so drunk you could even do that then it would of been impossible to get aroused, if you did get aroused then in my book you were soba enough to tell her ''NO'' in a clear way
Why does it make it ok when the rapist says its fine?I'm not sure I would call that rape as he said "and she said it was fine." At that point OP did not say no its not fine and he explained what happened after that so he could have said No.
I think she may have thought he was complying as he never said no after that, though described her putting the condom on so seems aware. Now if he could not say no that changes things imo, but if he could have said no at that moment. I personally would not send her to jail for rape.Why does it make it ok when the rapist says its fine?
I personally would not send her to jail for rape.
Yes if she was completely passed out and out of it and could not say no.And would you send the man to jail if it was a girl who said no and passed out/was completely out of it because "she got wet so it was totally consent"?
Urgh.
Please, genderswap and say that again.
"If you were sober enough to get wet, you could've said louder and more clearer 'no'. So it wasn't rape."
Yes if she was completely passed out and out of it and could not say no.
Just recently talked with a girl about first kisses and she said that just for asking the answer would be no. I've asked a girl once long-long ago if I could kiss her and she also said later that it was a turn-off.
This comment is about the first seconds of the video, the kissing part, not the rest.
Constantly checking in and asking if they like it also seems like something a person who lacks confidence would do.
Why not just wait til she kisses you.
Yes if she was completely passed out and out of it and could not say no.
He was so drunk, that he just has excerpts of memory of the whole act. As far as I can see he wasn't able to bring a big resistance anymore. As people said, just because you don't have the power anymore to say make a bigger struggle, this isn't a no. In fact, if she didn't hear him say no at all, it would still be wrong.What?
I did not say that though, I was saying that if he was soba enough to get aroused then he was soba enough to say NO, and if he was soba enough to say no, but let her do it anyway, is that still rape?.
I dont know. if a completely soba man was sat down with some woman and she wanted to have sex and he said in a monotone fashion ''no I dont want to have sex'' but the woman did it anyway and the man just lay/sat there with no further resistance, would that be rape?
Though as Yrael said men can get erections even when drunk, so I was wrong.
What?
I did not say that though, I was saying that if he was soba enough to get aroused then he was soba enough to say NO, and if he was soba enough to say no, but let her do it anyway, is that still rape?.
I dont know. if a completely soba man was sat down with some woman and she wanted to have sex and he said in a monotone fashion ''no I dont want to have sex'' but the woman did it anyway and the man just lay/sat there with no further resistance, would that be rape?
Though as Yrael said men can get erections even when drunk, so I was wrong.
It sounds like sexual assault yes. I worry for the OP if he would want to take this further and report it, worried about the reception he would get. I'm certain if the gender roles were reversed it would be received with more clear cut procedure - but I would be concerned about what kind of things I'd have to go through if I were in the OPs place.
You know what?
I'll still continue asking. There is no way I'm ever putting myself in a situation where I could be accused of sexual assault.
So if I'm viewed as lacking confidence, oh well. I view it as, "avoiding fucking jail time," which is more important than any perceived lack of confidence.
I'm not sure I would call that rape as he said "and she said it was fine." At that point OP did not say no its not fine and he explained what happened after that so he could have said No.
It sounds like sexual assault yes.
Absolutely, I didn't mean to imply women wouldn't go through the same questioning, guilt and self-blame worries. I can imagine there's a level of "what are you complaining about?" disbelief type comments or side-glances though that a man - assaulted by a woman - would have to go through too.while I certainly agree with this, I think many women face the exact same worries and realities when taking a rape case further.
will people believe me? was it even really rape? or am I wrong? was it my fault?
I think these thoughts are not uncommon in female rape victims. I have to agree with others here and OP should at least make contact with professionals who can help and support him, if he doesnt feel he is ready to face the police (yet).
Well I'm in the UK, so I was trying to go by a more likely legal definition. I was not trying to be euphemistic.While in some jurisdictions this is technically true (e.g. in the UK women cannot commit rape)
The it'll be fine would bother me if I was conscious/aware enough to say no, but didn't. I'm not sure if OP was aware enough to say no at that point. If not then I guess the initial no would stand.The OP's story is very clear:
1. He said no.
2. He was incapacitated by drink, and passing in and out of consciousness.
So what's the difference? In fact, the OP's story has refusal AND incapacitation compared to just one. Why should a female rapist get away without jail time?
Well I'm in the UK, so I was trying to go by a more likely legal definition. I was not trying to be euphemistic.
He was so drunk, that he just has excerpts of memory of the whole act. As far as I can see he wasn't able to bring a big resistance anymore. As people said, just because you don't have the power anymore to say make a bigger struggle, this isn't a no. In fact, if she didn't hear him say no at all, it would still be wrong.
No answer does not mean yes. Yes means yes.
You're confusing what it means to be aroused and from what I can tell being sober.
If at any point in time during their time together he said no, much like "let's not do this drunk", and it happened anyway against his intent for the evening. He was raped.
One thing I fail to grasp is how, if OP was so fucked up and slipping in and out of conciseness did he sustain an erection. I have trouble holding one when I want too if I'm literally pass out drunk.
While in some jurisdictions this is technically true (e.g. in the UK women cannot commit rape), to call it "sexual assault" is disgusting. Kissing someone without their consent is sexual assault. Touching their genitalia without consent is sexual assault. To put a woman forcing a man to have sex with her on a par with these act automatically invites a comparison to these acts, and diminishes the seriousness of the offence.
Let's call it by what it is: rape. She's a rapist. She deserves the full weight of that title and its connotations, instead of what is essentially a euphemism.
I missed this post this is exactly how I feel about the situation.See I actually read a little bit of confusion here. OP says "hey we're drunk let's not do this," she says "No it's fine." The way that reads, and I don't want to speak for the OP here or imply anything, is that she thought he meant "You're drunk I don't want to coerce you," but wanted to give him consent, when really he was saying "I'm not okay with this."
Or could be she was playing date rapist. It's honestly pretty confusing and I don't think it's quite as easy to explain by swapping the genders.
Something similar happened to me once with a girlfriend. She wanted some sex but I was dead tired. I said no but she was practically begging so I begrudgingly consented and fell asleep while she was on top. I woke up feeling used and upset by it. I should have known then that that girl was no good but stuck around for a while longer.
OP if you're still talking with the girl or are in any sort of relationship I'd say you need to talk about it and lay down some ground rules. If she brushes it off she doesn't respect you and you need to ditch her.