TheGreenGiant said:and waht's that. Too lazy to search
Firefox? Is it really better?
9.7, or GTA:SA +.1
TheGreenGiant said:and waht's that. Too lazy to search
Firefox? Is it really better?
Society said:Hmm
http://www.gamespot.com/xbox/action/halo2/review.html
Says 'blank'.
Normally when a game's review is not up it says 'page not found'. Like this, maybe it was there.
Sai said:I like how people are acting like it's a bad score.
Gchaime said:So what if it's true? My God, a 9.1 still is an excellent score.
bitwise said:good to see people aren't buying this. If you are, consider this:
- it came from gamespot's "system wars" forum
- it was "discovered" by a user with less than 100 posts
- it was "corroborated" by a user with less than 100 posts
- a third user "corroborating" it had 17 posts -- and used a fake name based on the name of a real poster in order to try and fool people
nobody credible claims to have seen it.
complete bullshit.
Shinobi said:The gaming world is simply teeming with idiots....
Shinobi said:Alas, anything less then 9.6 for a regarded killer app is seen as a bad score these days. It's all part of the fanboy wars...can't have it scoring a whole 0.4 less then the killer app for console B.
The gaming world is simply teeming with idiots...that people still make a fuss about such a stupid, insignificant figure for a game they're going to buy anyway has simply become a source of amusement for me now.
Sysgen said:
bitwise said:the original post stated this came from the teamxbox forums. so take your cookie and shove it
-- in your mouth
Should Halo2 look any different? Maybe switch the Graphics and Sound scores but that's it. So no I don't think the score is real unless Kasavin docked it points in Gameplay which I can't imagine given the propensity to overlook GTA Gameplay issues on Gamespot.
Yeah if Halo 2 doesn't deserve a 10 in sound I don't know what does. Great sound effects, amazing music, very good voice acting (from what I gather from the commercial and aside from the Spanish version ) and the technical prowess to back it up (5.1 etc).dark10x said:Yeah, bump up the visuals to a 9 and the sound to a 10!
GSG Flash said:Switch the two numbers in 6.9 around and you've got 9.6, probably the real score
/random babbling
but ppl buy games based in gamespot reviews
time to ms kill gamespot
lol and they say nintendo fans are bad
SantaCruZer said:from teamxbox:
Quote:
but ppl buy games based in gamespot reviews
time to ms kill gamespot
lol and they say nintendo fans are bad
So it's not even as good as Tony Hawk 3 for PS2?Deg said:Its a 9.9 according to someone on another forum.
This was an unfortnate error on our part, but that ultimately isn't the final score for Halo 2. It was a system glitch, and one we fixed, although obviously not one we fixed soon enough. The score for Halo 2 isn't final yet, nor will it be until the review itself is up and live on the site. So, yeah, that's about the end of that. Figured a response from an admin type wouldn't hurt.
hmmm, so it wasn't faked either, interesting.Redbeard said:One of the admins puts out the fire
Anybody mind explaining texture pop in?ced said:Yeah this is my problem with reviews, they are just not consistant.
I mean GS gives the original a 9.7, and from all accounts Halo 2 is leaps and bounds better. The only complaint Ive seen is the texture pop in, and a cliffhanger ending.
Oh well wait for tomorrow I guess.
For the last time.....
A score of a certain number right now cannot be compared to the same score from years ago. As games as a whole progressively get "better" the ante continues to be upped and review scores shift accordingly. If this were not the case than games that got perfect scores originally, and have sequels that are even better would have to get scores that are off the scale to keep the comparative balance(IE since halo 2 is better than 10,10,10 halo:CE, it would get something like 11,11,11). As expectations are raised, the value of the different scores needs to be adjusted.
Code_Link said:Well, Google cached the page for anyone wanting to see the page in HTML. They can't really deny it (although they're not):
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&...+aspired+bring+you+world's+most+comprehensive
Simply click "Cached."
Anyway, that's strange. They have a score up but it's not final? If the score is changed (higher or lower) I will lose some respect for GameSpot.