NYT is more accurate
56.7% @ 20% reporting
That's completed precincts, more of the vote % than that is in (probably 40%).
NYT is more accurate
56.7% @ 20% reporting
NYT is more accurate
56.7% @ 20% reporting
Cool, now I'll have to read more misspelled tweets from a man who, despite everything, keeps winning
I'll never again believe the US is a meritocracy. Just a reward system for harnessing hatred
Just as an FWIW, when you're posting results, make it clear if its the percentage of the districts that are in or the vote that is in. Those are different numbers and the reason why people are posting what seem like conflicting results. Only make vote% to vote% and district% to district% comparisons.
Just as an FWIW, when you're posting results, make it clear if its the percentage of the districts that are in or the vote that is in. Those are different numbers and the reason why people are posting what seem like conflicting results. Only make vote% to vote% and district% to district% comparisons.
Imagine if he gets just below 50%, but the Dems' total votes were above 50%. Why are there other Dems running? From the NYT, those other Dems have a combined 0.9% of the vote, which could make the difference if this comes down to the wire.
People who won't get out of the way costing Dems seats in FPTP elections in the US?Imagine if he gets just below 50%, but the Dems' total votes were above 50%. Why are there other Dems running? From the NYT, those other Dems have a combined 0.9% of the vote, which could make the difference if this comes down to the wire.
Imagine if he gets just below 50%, but the Dems' total votes were above 50%. Why are there other Dems running? From the NYT, those other Dems have a combined 0.9% of the vote, which could make the difference if this comes down to the wire.
32% precincts reporting, 53.94% Ossoff.
People who won't get out of the way costing Dems seats in FPTP elections in the US?
It's an annual tradition at this point.
Dropped again. Down to 53.9%
Imagine if he gets just below 50%, but the Dems' total votes were above 50%. Why are there other Dems running? From the NYT, those other Dems have a combined 0.9% of the vote, which could make the difference if this comes down to the wire.
doesn't look like he gets to 50+
gonna step away from this
I think he's done.
I'm terrified of 2018.
I think he's done.
I'm terrified of 2018.
I think he's done.
I'm terrified of 2018.
I think he's done.
I'm terrified of 2018.
Terrified about not being able to flip every +20 R district?
I think he's done.
I'm terrified of 2018.
Terrified about not being able to flip every +20 R district?
Dems keep up this momentum they might actually flip some of the races they lost by 10% or less last time.
That is, if they actually capitalize on this.
You realize this is not the end of this process right?
Why? this is a heavy GOP district.
We aren't going to flip all of them.
Does anyone pay attention to anything
It's a feeder for one!This isn't a FPTP election.
I should clarify,
I'm terrified of how I deal with 2018 emotionally.
I think he's done.
I'm terrified of 2018.
Does anyone pay attention to anything
Seriously, what the fuck. This being a close race in the slightest is going to scare the shit out of every Republican not in a totally red stronghold.
Dave Wasserman‏Verified account
@Redistrict
PROJECTION: #GA06 is headed to a 6/20 runoff between Jon Ossoff (D) & Karen Handel (R). @CookPolitical still rates race a Toss Up.
Eh the nature of these special elections / primaries, that's just a part of the process. For all we know they might have effectively dropped out after Ossoff got the attention, but cant remove themselves from the ballot.
Then that bodes well for him in the run off in a few weeks. Basically he just has to convince a few thousand people to switch to him, but the Republican has to convince 50 - 60 thousand people to switch to her.
I should clarify,
I'm terrified of how I deal with 2018 emotionally.