Just to clarify, if Ossoff gets 50%+1 he wins the seat, but if he doesn't it goes to a runoff in June?
This attitude has to stop.I think he's done.
I'm terrified of 2018.
All the Republicans would vote for Handel so no. Almost no chance.So if it's a toss-up between Osoff and Handel in 6/20, Osoff has an advantage there right?
So if it's a toss-up between Osoff and Handel in 6/20, Osoff has an advantage there right?
edit: Oh, I see. Not necessarily.
All the Republicans would vote for Handel so no. Almost no chance.
I just wanted Trump to go full caps ballistic like a less-inhibited-than-average 5-year-old
I love it when that happens
By "almost no chance" you mean "a toss up that could go either way"
Not sure why people keep saying this, if he gets 49% of the vote he only needs to gain 1% more of the vote. The others Dems alone account for that. Whoever wins on the republican side needs to gain all their opponents votes in order to have a chance, and there is no guarantee that will be the case. Asking a single candidate to win 50% or more in a jungle primary was already asking for too much, its crazy talk to believe this was his best shot.
40% precincts reporting, Ossoff at 50.76%
Yeah, but then its much harder. Its only 1 Republican then and they can all rally around it. His best shot was tonight.
"There's still a chance" people are almost as annoying as the doom sayersThere's still a chance but he's gottah get those numbers back up. Da fuq are the democrats
"There's still a chance" people are almost as annoying as the doom sayers
There's still a chance but he's gottah get those numbers back up. Da fuq are the democrats
There's still a chance but he's gottah get those numbers back up. Da fuq are the democrats
"There's still a chance" people are almost as annoying as the doom sayers
"There's still a chance" people are almost as annoying as the doom sayers
Whoever wins on the republican side needs to gain all their opponents votes in order to have a chance, and there is no guarantee that will be the case.
There is a reason why people are saying it. Prerunoff elections always have a lower turnout. 1 dem verses 1 republican is likely to be a negative. Republicans would be more motivated to come out to vote against him. Again it's not impossible but there is a lot of work to be doneNot sure why people keep saying this, if he gets 49% of the vote he only needs to gain 1% more of the vote. The others Dems alone account for that. Whoever wins on the republican side needs to gain all their opponents votes in order to have a chance, and there is no guarantee that will be the case. Asking a single candidate to win 50% or more in a jungle primary was already asking for too much, its crazy talk to believe this was his best shot.
Looking more and more like the other dem candidates might actually spoil this. Hilarious.
Not sure why people keep saying this, if he gets 49% of the vote he only needs to gain 1% more of the vote. The others Dems alone account for that. Whoever wins on the republican side needs to gain all their opponents votes in order to have a chance, and there is no guarantee that will be the case. Asking a single candidate to win 50% or more in a jungle primary was already asking for too much, its crazy talk to believe this was his best shot.
That's good news, though. If Total D > Total R, then the runoff should presumably be a win (although that obviously ignores turnout changes, which will be huge).
Did I have a seizure or did he just recover a half percentage point
Did I have a seizure or did he just recover a half percentage point
Osoff would need to ramp up his campaign until the runoff: he would need to keep the Democrats in his district excited while convincing some of those Republican voters to switch over to him between now and June.
Dekalb brought him back up. That country is 94% doneDid I have a seizure or did he just recover a half percentage point
Runoffs are stupid. Its not our fault Republicans had 17 people running. There should have been only 1 election.
Runoffs are stupid. Its not our fault Republicans had 17 people running. There should have been only 1 election.
Fulton County, which is more blue, only has 16% of precincts reporting.
I mean this going to a runoff will get more attention. For both sides. It's a coin toss. More money gets put into and all that jazz.
I don't view it as a negative. It's just an election.