I decided to pop over to that thread because of you guys talking about it, holy fuck what a mistake that was.
They're acting like he already reviewed the game!
BUT HE SAID IT'S NOT FOR HIM AND IT CRASHED HE'S A WITCH BURN HIM
I decided to pop over to that thread because of you guys talking about it, holy fuck what a mistake that was.
They're acting like he already reviewed the game!
Damn, you are right. Vinny + open world game + fan of the series + livestream? That would be a godlike combination.
I decided to pop over to that thread because of you guys talking about it, holy fuck what a mistake that was.
They're acting like he already reviewed the game!
Jeff's tweet was the first major negative statement about the game, and in Review Threads (especially pre-release review threads for major games in which most reviews are positive) there is always a "Burn the witch!" mentality that dominates as soon as a negative opinion surfaces.
The base game deserves better, I just don't understand how you build and keep an online community with such sparse content and missing fundamental features like playing together in a party.
anonymous asked:
Hey Jeff, when will we see a quick look for the Witcher 3? Bonus question: do you think Bethesda will stick with the Skyrim engine (heavily upgraded/modified of course) for Fallout 4? thanks
No sooner than release day. The embargo is all specific about the split between reviews and gameplay videos.
Absolutely.IS THE MIXLR STREAM JUST HIM MAKING FART NOISES AT THE WITCHER 3 I NEED TO KNOW.
I for one can't believe Jeff gave such a low score of "Not being grabbed" to the Witcher 3.
It's like 2006 all over again. History always repeats itself.
The party play reads to me like the team wanting that feature in but Nintendo, being Nintendo, not wanting to sacrifice precious Wii U game development time enough to devote resources to it before launch.
I've had a weird feeling about the content stuff ever since that Nintendo Direct because they've consistently shown more a lot more content than will be at launch in videos and screens going back months (or even back to the reveal trailer). Which makes me strongly believe that they're deliberately staggering out the release of maps and the like (that may be very much finished already) to keep initial buyers playing the game with constant promises of "DON'T STOP PLAYING, SQUIDS, WE'VE GOT AN INK-REDIBLE NEW UPDATE NEXT WEEK!!"
Which could be one part anti-used games, one part "this is how you build a multiplayer community, right????", and one part "We want to hide gaps in the Wii U schedule with DLC packs for our multiplayer games."
The party play reads to me like the team wanting that feature in but Nintendo, being Nintendo, not wanting to sacrifice precious Wii U game development time enough to devote resources to it before launch.
I've had a weird feeling about the content stuff ever since that Nintendo Direct because they've consistently shown more a lot more content than will be at launch in videos and screens going back months (or even back to the reveal trailer). Which makes me strongly believe that they're deliberately staggering out the release of maps and the like (that may be very much finished already) to keep initial buyers playing the game with constant promises of "DON'T STOP PLAYING, SQUIDS, WE'VE GOT AN INK-REDIBLE NEW UPDATE NEXT WEEK!!"
Which could be one part anti-used games, one part "this is how you build a multiplayer community, right????", and one part "We want to hide gaps in the Wii U schedule with DLC packs for our multiplayer games."
I for one can't believe Jeff gave such a low score of "Not being grabbed" to the Witcher 3.
We just need Dan to get on Twitter and say Geralt looks like a sickly soccer player and that the Witcher does not seem like a cool game for cool dudes and we can burn this internet down.
We just need Dan to get on Twitter and say Geralt looks like a sickly soccer player and that the Witcher does not seem like a cool game for cool dudes and we can burn this internet down.
Context? Been following these nutters since last year.
Context? Been following these nutters since last year.
We just need Dan to get on Twitter and say Geralt looks like a sickly soccer player and that the Witcher does not seem like a cool game for cool dudes and we can burn this internet down.
Context? Been following these nutters since last year.
Dan hates fantasy games, so that might actually happen.
Jeff ranked Twilight Princess "Great" instead of "Superb" for Gamespot.
It was a monstrous crime.
Jeff gave Twilight Princess a 8.8. People were not pleased.
Fucking lol.
Fucking lol.
Now the thread is arguing about how to dig a hole.
Also, I think it's totally worth it all for the Hottest Mess/Most Disappointing/Please Stop/Worst Game awards.
Now the thread is arguing about how to dig a hole.
Basically. I would've given it a 7.Jeff was right. That game is boring as hell (and motion controls suck).
Hahahaha that thread title
The Witcher 3 | Review Thread (Update: STFU about the Gerstmann tweet)
Jeff was right. That game is boring as hell (and motion controls suck).
Fucking lol.
Now the thread is arguing about how to dig a hole.
Yes in retrospect Jeff's review was right on the money which made it all the more impressive he was able to rise above the BS.
Jeff was right. That game is boring as hell (and motion controls suck).
People were still dragging that body around last year with the DriveClub review which I found very amusing.
Jeff's 8.8 is iconic. People even use that review to complain about Jeff even if they don't know it was Jeff that wrote it
When are people going to learn that the last place you go for an objective review is Giant Bomb? I mean, they have stated that over and over and over throughout the years. Jeff will be the first to tell you that GB is the last place to go for an "objective" review.
Also, Vinny's face at the end of this GIF is priceless.