Hot Coldman
Banned
but you have a skyward sword avatar!
Skyward Sword is a good game!
but you have a skyward sword avatar!
Skyward Sword is a good game!
It is, starting with the two hour prologue.
Skyward Sword is a good game!
The site comments are pretty fantastic. It's like Dan kicked everyone's dog.
Any other QLs with a similar community meltdown?
After the ten hour long tutorial, it is.
Shens.
No, no, Skyward Sword is the one with the bird. You're thinking of Twilight Princess.
No, no, Skyward Sword is the one with the bird. You're thinking of Twilight Princess.
The site comments are pretty fantastic. It's like Dan kicked everyone's dog.
Any other QLs with a similar community meltdown?
Danny's super charismatic though and whenever he says something I disagree with, he says it in such a way that you can't get mad about it because it's just like he casually dismisses it. O'Dwyer's on another level of talking. He's like Vinny tier likeable. It's why I thought people were crazy for thinking GB would get him because Gamespot NEEDS him.
Giant Bomb is a website run by people who will tell you, without flinching, that Majora's Mask and Yoshi's Island are bad games. I don't see how you could be angry at Quick Looks by this point, we've known the crew are monsters for years.
Wow, what a terrible Quick Look for Metro. Like, why even do it? They already skip a lot of games that they don't want to play, so why do this one? Especially like months after the game came out?
Yeah, that QL made me want to play Metro. I'm not at all familiar with the series but the survival mechanics looked pretty cool and its exactly the type of deviation I look for in FPS these days.
When it comes to the crew being negative about a game, I find that it doesn't influence me in anyway. Although if they are excited about something, I'll usually check it out.
The problem I have is that it just feels like a video made for clickbait to get linked around to "angry Metro fans".They do QLs of games they don't like all the time. See the annual Dynasty Warriors update for one example. I'm guessing Dan wanted to rant about the games, and that's why they made a QL of it.
Woah, there's a new Velvet Sundown scenario out. Has anyone tried it?
The problem I have is that it just feels like a video made for clickbait to get linked around to "angry Metro fans".
I just don't get that feeling with other videos like the Smash QL where Brad and Jeff basically didn't want to be in the room for any longer than they had to.
The problem I have is that it just feels like a video made for clickbait to get linked around to "angry Metro fans".
I just don't get that feeling with other videos like the Smash QL where Brad and Jeff basically didn't want to be in the room for any longer than they had to.
I'm also with Jeff that I thought inclusions like Shulk and the Fire Emblem characters felt wasted. Very bland choices compared to things like your Ice Climbers or R.O.B. or Game & Watch
I played some of Last Light recently since it was on Plus. I really enjoyed the stealth sections in human territory, they weren't too challenging but it was solid stealth.
I'm also with Jeff that I thought inclusions like Shulk and the Fire Emblem characters felt wasted. Very bland choices compared to things like your Ice Climbers or R.O.B. or Game & Watch
Shulk is a fine choice, I think, but even as a fan of the franchise I wish that there weren't so many FE characters (and the same goes for Kid Icarus - three characters for a series with as many games is ridiculous).
They don't include enough Fire Emblem classics. Where's Lyn? Eliwood? Hector? I haven't played FE:A yet so these new ones are complete strangers to me. They even took Roy out. There is no FE7 or FE8 representing.
I'm sure they haven't had any meetings trying to figure out how to attract that golden angry Metro fans demographic![]()
I'd like to know why they would bother to do a QL for what is essentially an "old game" at this point.That seems...kind of cynical and insulting. Do you think it was entirely Dan's own idea to fish for clicks in this way?
'Offending' a few fans is not a reason to pull/cancel a QL. If it was boring, sure. But it wasn't, it was actually pretty funny.I'd like to know why they would bother to do a QL for what is essentially an "old game" at this point.
There's also the point where just because you made a video doesn't mean you have to put it up. Remember when Patrick interviewed Uwe Boll live? He decided that the interview wasn't worth anything so he just decided not to use it, even if the Uwe Boll "name" probably would have generated some hits for them.
I thought/hoped they had cleaned things up over there.Wow, site comments now getting into calling Dan an asshole. It's starting to say more about the users than Dan, that's for sure.
People are shitting on Dan just because he's shitting on a game they like. Quick Looks have never been about being neutral.
they're supposed to be entertaining, though.
they're supposed to be entertaining, though.