Refresh my memory -- why did Fallout 4 avoid the Most Disappointing Award? I assume it was buggy like any other Bethesda game, and it ran like crap on consoles.
I tend to feel like it gets off the hook because "Well we all knew Bethesda games are buggy anyway, and the PC port performs fine."
Refresh my memory -- why did Fallout 4 avoid the Most Disappointing Award? I assume it was buggy like any other Bethesda game, and it ran like crap on consoles.
I tend to feel like it gets off the hook because "Well we all knew Bethesda games are buggy anyway, and the PC port performs fine."
Refresh my memory -- why did Fallout 4 avoid the Most Disappointing Award? I assume it was buggy like any other Bethesda game, and it ran like crap on consoles.
I tend to feel like it gets off the hook because "Well we all knew Bethesda games are buggy anyway, and the PC port performs fine."
Mario Maker 3DS will be disappointment of the year. That quick look is full of sadness.
Refresh my memory -- why did Fallout 4 avoid the Most Disappointing Award? I assume it was buggy like any other Bethesda game, and it ran like crap on consoles.
I tend to feel like it gets off the hook because "Well we all knew Bethesda games are buggy anyway, and the PC port performs fine."
Disappointment is contingent on expectations. I imagine a tossup on disappointment between Mario Run and Mario Maker 3DS. The latter could be less of a disappointment seeing as Nintendo wasn't coy about its missing features.
Sneaking in Titanfall 2 into the top 3 while he misdirects everyone with doom vs overwatch vs hitman is totally a thing Jeff would do, Alex is the only hope, he is the only one who can see through Jeff's ploys.
But neither Doom nor Overwatch will be able to survive the Brad-Dan-Vinny Hitman combo
IIRC, the argument defending Fallout 4 was essentially "no one makes games like this, ergo all of the problems in their games are not an issue." And by "games like this," they meant how it remembers where every item and actor is, which makes it this magical experience.
It was a ridiculous defense.
Are you saying that by virtue of that aspect not being important? If something like item placement suddenly became genericized, I imagine people would be more upset and less indifferent.
Doom will win, but y'all are unprepared for the combined passion Brad and Jeff have for The Witness. I could see it ranking higher than Hitman.
Brad and Austin argued that since Fallout 4 didn't improve on anything, it meant that those problems are completely endemic to Bethesda's games and unfixable
Disappointment is contingent on expectations. I imagine a tossup on disappointment between Mario Run and Mario Maker 3DS. The latter could be less of a disappointment seeing as Nintendo wasn't coy about its missing features.
The Fallout defense really only worked because of Austin. He's an amazing debater when he goes all out and he did there.
Doom will win, but y'all are unprepared for the combined passion Brad and Jeff have for The Witness. I could see it ranking higher than Hitman.
Is Invisible Inc the only time a game made the list that only one person had played? Can't be, right?
I think that argument might hold weight if Fallout 4 was on PS3/360. But for the game to jump to new platforms with 10x the processing power and 10x the memory and still have the same problems is pretty ridiculous. It's not unreasonable to expect that the PS4/X1 might have made the game better.
Which was why I actually thouoght he was a detriment to the event. Same with Invisible Inc making it on the list. He's so good at the argument portion that he actively breaks the game. It's not even that his arguments are amazing, it's the conviction with which he makes them.
I hate that he was able to brute-force Invisible Inc onto the list. But yes, he's undeniably good at saying "Even if you didn't like this game, even if you didn't play this game, it is incredibly significant and deserves recognition because...."
At the same time though, I think his argument in favor of Fallout 4 was that he was able to build a basketball court and liked it.
Austin mentioned on the most recent Waypoint podcast that if he were part of Giant Bomb's deliberations this year he'd have argued for Overwatch.
Austin mentioned on the most recent Waypoint podcast that if he were part of Giant Bomb's deliberations this year he'd have argued for Overwatch.
Is Invisible Inc the only time a game made the list that only one person had played? Can't be, right?
But the reason to give FO4 construction a chance is obvious: you think to yourself "what if I can build a basketball court".
One that serves no actual purpose. To the game world, a basketball court is just a bunch of items propped up together.
I liked overwatch alot but it ain't even the best shooter of the year to me. I would definitely give it in the top 10 but......
It ain't winning the shooter standoff between doom and titanfall 2. Austin could get it up there but not higher then those 2.
This is Giantbomb's GOTY, and of which games dominated the conversation the most its between Hitman, Overwatch, Doom and Titanfall 2.
If it was the larger conversation about games in general, I think it'd be Overwatch no contest. I don't think there is another game that commanded the same amount of attention (and still does) this year
edit: ok no mans sky but even then I dont think so
Who talks about overwatch the most? Dan? It's top 10 probably at 5? With doom, tf2, hit man fighting the top 3 and maybe the witness sneaking up there at 4 if a good argument is made.This is Giantbomb's GOTY, and of which games dominated the conversation the most its between Hitman, Overwatch, Doom and Titanfall 2.
If it was the larger conversation about games in general, I think it'd be Overwatch no contest. I don't think there is another game that commanded the same amount of attention (and still does) this year
I hate that he was able to brute-force Invisible Inc onto the list. But yes, he's undeniably good at saying "Even if you didn't like this game, even if you didn't play this game, it is incredibly significant and deserves recognition because...."
At the same time though, I think his argument in favor of Fallout 4 was that he was able to build a basketball court and liked it.
What if you could collect every item in a game and put it in the same spot and it hardlocked? Would that be a bug, or a feature?
These are the questions Bethesda is pushing us to answer.
One that serves no actual purpose. To the game world, a basketball court is just a bunch of items propped up together.
Who talks about overwatch the most? Dan? It's top 10 probably at 5? With doom, tf2, hit man fighting the top 3 and maybe the witness sneaking up there if a good argument is made.
I don't want to rock your world or anything but video games are all vapid and pointless and the only thing that matters is your experience.
Is Invisible Inc the only time a game made the list that only one person had played? Can't be, right?