I think Ian is much better looking without that hobo beard.
Myggen is wasted.
Pretty bummed I'm going to miss extra life next weekend. Maybe I should just skip my friend's wedding.
I should really play majora's mask again.
A Dan and Jeff cooking show needs to be a premium feature.
Myggen is wasted.
I feel like I should play a zelda game one of these days.
Does darksiders count?
I feel like I should play a zelda game one of these days.
Does darksiders count?
Nah, I've played and finished darksiders already, what I meant is does having played darksiders count as playing zelda?
Nah, I've played and finished darksiders already, what I meant is does having played darksiders count as playing zelda?
Nah, I've played and finished darksiders already, what I meant is does having played darksiders count as playing zelda?
You don't even save a princess in Darksiders.Nah, I've played and finished darksiders already, what I meant is does having played darksiders count as playing zelda?
There is. :lolhm, is there a hookshot?
Haha, alright, I meant it more as a joke really. I do have a 3DS so I could get the remakes and link between worlds, but zelda games never drop in price it seems.
Who the hell is this Dan Ryckert and what is he doing in every Giant Bomb-video.
A porno, wasn't it?Was it ever discovered where that script the guys found on their 2013 E3 set was from?
Bringing life back to GB.Who the hell is this Dan Ryckert and what is he doing in every Giant Bomb-video.
Who the hell is this Dan Ryckert and what is he doing in every Giant Bomb-video.
Do it.
On the australian eshop?
Huh, probably should have jumped onto it then, but the sale wasn't too huge.
Also right now I'm skittish enough about buying more digital content seeing nintendo's terrible account system and me wanting to upgrade to the new 3DS.
Vinny grew more hair and transformed into dan ryckert.
I'd personally go with A Link Between Worlds for a 2D Zelda, but it's kinda hard to go wrong (except for maybe the DS ones but I haven't played those).
It's great, but it's not a "Zelda game"Play Zelda 2. Come at me.
Excellent point. STAY THE FUCK AWAY FROM SPIRIT TRACKS.
I was never able to nail down which ones were doing it and which stood against it, but I've had PR people tell me that they were able to essentially "buy" the cover spot in magazines published in the UK. That always struck me as pretty nasty. That was Xbox/PS2-era stuff. I feel like, depending on who you talk to, the UK magazine scene sounded like it was pretty flagrant back in the day.
By all accounts, Game Informer does not sell its cover.
We'd also hear about smaller sites bending to pressure from companies from time to time. Since smaller sites rely on the free game gravy train in order to post any coverage at all (they, unlike us, wouldn't be able to afford to buy everything if push came to shove) publishers could say things like "we're never going to send you another video card/game/whatever ever again if you don't fix this" and get things to change. It's a big part of why Metacritic now has a "your first score is set in stone forever" policy. This was back in the 90s and early 2000s, but sometimes I wonder if "smaller sites" haven't just been replaced by "fledgling YouTube channels" these days. Both cases involve small-to-solo operations from people who, in some cases, just heard it was a great way to get free games.
I also think there's probably an important distinction to be made between Capital-C Corruption and Dumb Moves From People Who Should Probably Know Better. I was lucky enough to work under smart people like Ron Dulin when I first got to GameSpot, and his no-bullshit attitude about dealing with the companies who made games shaped who I am today. But everyone makes mistakes. At one point (again, this is probably PS1/N64 era) Midway contacted us and asked if they could interview us about their upcoming lineup. It was for some video they were presenting to shareholders. We ended up agreeing for some dumb reason. This was right around the time that a lot of us were getting way into NFL Blitz, so, overall, we were genuinely pretty postiive about some of the games on their schedule. But imagine how that looks! There we were, probably up on some big screen, at some company event, being shown talking about these games that we liked. Eventually that made it onto a tape and got distributed somehow. We shouldn't have agreed to that. Even though we felt we were being honest about those games, it looked pretty gross. I felt like a real idiot over that one.
I also go back and forth on the "let us put your logo in our game" discussion. We used to do it for awhile back at GameSpot. One of the Rush games has the videogames.com logo hidden in there as an unlockable car or something. At some point we very definitively stopped. Over the last few years, we've loosened up on this one, but it's not something I take lightly. It's the sort of thing that I would definitely say prevents us from reviewing a game. But perhaps we could review it and post a disclosure about whatever asset is being used. We've certainly posted disclosures on reviews before.
Lastly, since someone brought up the Official mags, I'm not 100% sure how they operated. But having spoken with people who have worked in editorial at official pubs before, they sound like they were on the up and up. But that's at the Associate/Senior Editor level. No idea if the suits at the top were doing weird stuff or not. You should ask Giancarlo about it, I think he did stuff for OPM and he also had a brief stint at Nintendo Power.
Excellent point. STAY THE FUCK AWAY FROM SPIRIT TRACKS.
Interesting post by Jeff regarding "corruption" in the games media (which is such a tired topic at this point, but whatever):
Haha, alright, I meant it more as a joke really. I do have a 3DS so I could get the remakes and link between worlds, but zelda games never drop in price it seems.
I was never a big fan of that game for some reason, but I respect how fucking weird it is. Especially for a game made by Nintendo.
OK THAT is why I could not find the thread anymore !!! :O:O
NO WAY why did it move over .
Now all future GB gaf threads will die off a slow dead just like every other topic that goes to community
Danny on his tumblr has been very critical of some members of the UK games press pretty much backing up Jeff's views.
Yeah, a lot of stuff lined up in a specific way that made those ads look pretty bad.
A lot of sites that rely on ad revenue are finding themselves in an increasingly tough spot. Typical display ads (banners and stuff) don't work very well any more and, if you're running a site that's used by a fairly savvy audience, your adblock percentages are probably very high. FInding new ways to get advertiser messages in your stuff so you can make enough money to survive without going so far that all of your content is hard to watch and/or looks "bad" is the new struggle. I spend a not-insignificant amount of time fielding quesitons from our sales team that start with "hey, I think I know the answer to this question, but I need to at least be able to say that I asked you directly about <ad campaign that would interfere too heavily with the user experience on the site or put us in a weird position>."
If we took more of those shortcuts we'd probably bring in way more money and be able to hire more people and so on and so forth. But at some point, once you've made all those compromises, is the site even still worth visiting?