Servbot #42
Unconfirmed Member
it's offensive to the concept of good game design
Why?
it's offensive to the concept of good game design
Is that COD picture offensive? Because i see no problem.
I wish it wasn't context sensitive and their would be an actual "Pay Respects" key in the mapping options. I'd map it to one of my mouse buttons for easier access. What if I want to pay respects while strafing right?
Why?
wiggle LS to make single tear fall
I miss Vinny's ILM song.
While in stealth, press X to kiss your wife.
It's really weird how much this got hyped up. Like it was something amazing and mysterious before the game came out.. and it was just a context button at the start of the game.
It's really weird how much this got hyped up. Like it was something amazing and mysterious before the game came out.. and it was just a context button at the start of the game.
What game was that again? I vaguely remember reading about this.
Shadow of Mordor.
i remember Polygon making a big deal about it because of course
I find it funny because you don't really even kiss her, you just give her flowers.
They cut that because stealth kissing your wife was too controversial.
I got the batch of modules where you still kiss her.
I, too, would like a Columbo game, Alex.
Vinny's Columbo impression is terrible, lol.
Oh really? I didn't know that, that does clarify the confusion I had over the scene when I played the game.
I only know Columbo from several parodies, and I have indeed seen better ones. But the quicklook itself is great, I devoured it and put Sherlock Holmes on my wishlist.
Nah, it was just a bad not-even-really-a-joke.
Yeah, it's great. Beast is the reigning king of adventure game QLs.
this is terribly writtenIt was an opinion piece written by Zach Gage (dev of Ridiculous Fishing) and published on Polygon. You might not agree but I don't like when this is generalized to the whole site. Even if you're in the camp of pretty much always disagreeing with Polygon's reviews / opinion pieces.
I like the Kotaku piece about the stealth kissing. Some people just don't want game criticism I guess. To some people, thinking critically about a game is equal to stirring up controversy.
Why is that bad?this is terribly written
he actually used the phrase allow me to explain sincerely
I like the Kotaku piece about the stealth kissing. Some people just don't want game criticism I guess. To some people, thinking critically about a game is equal to stirring up controversy.
I like the Kotaku piece about the stealth kissing. Some people just don't want game criticism I guess. To some people, thinking critically about a game is equal to stirring up controversy.
It's a metaphor for oral sex.I find it funny because you don't really even kiss her, you just give her flowers.
it just strikes me as clumsy grasping at the video game equivalent of literary analysis. which, somewhat embarrassingly, is what my bachelor's degree is in. I just look at that article and cringe thinking of some of my 1st and 2nd year papers. You can't convince me that whole subject is interesting beyond the initial hypothesis.
I mean, maybe it would be if it was actually intentional and not just developers trying to think of a clever way to introduce mechanics. there's nothing to support that they're drawing lines between love and violence, or a larger metacommentary about reducing all ranges of human emotion to the same rote series of button presses.
and maybe that's why we're faced with a generation of people raised on games who can't differentiate between fiction and threatening someone's life and wellbeing, because after all, it's just button presses.
Shadows of Mordor is not about that.
Let the criticism come. Let's talk about games I love doing that.
Let's not have it be terrible trash and headline attention grabbing.
I genuinely believe there is not one person in games journalism that can handle real well written, concise, intelligent, thought provoking criticism and analysis. Most of them are extremely young, few went to school for it, most have spent their entire career in magazines meant to sell things, or websites made to get clicks and very few have actually attempted or shown that that is the direction they would like to go.
It's extremely hard to do. It's a rare thing to find for movies, books or plays which is why writers will stay in one place for long periods of their life and work for the New Yorker or The New York Times.
I guess you could say I'm complaining about having lots of poor attempts, and how could they get better if they don't practice! I dunno, but I don't want to waste my time reading their practice. Wake me up when it's good and I'll take it seriously.
The other issue is of course what you're aiming at is whether the audience would be there to support it. I don't know that either.
I like the Kotaku piece about the stealth kissing. Some people just don't want game criticism I guess. To some people, thinking critically about a game is equal to stirring up controversy.
If this COD screenshot will not result in a hilarious discussion on the Bombast I will be really disappointed. Have to cross post it here.
wrong image
wrong image
Anyone got any info on when the review embargo on COD: Advanced Warfare lifts? The internet is telling me November 3rd at midnight PST, but I have no idea if that's correct. Really interested in Jeff's take on the game, it might be the game that gets me into COD again...maybe. Probably not.
Yeah it's tonight.