Sunster
Member
Messed up story, dad seems like a dick. Some scary responses in here though, people flat out saying they will not help a lost kid.
it's scaryyyyyyy to help kids
Messed up story, dad seems like a dick. Some scary responses in here though, people flat out saying they will not help a lost kid.
Some kids literally don't know any better. I was in a convience store by my place while I was in school and a little kid, probably like 3 straight up comes up to me and asks me to open a bag of cherry blasters for her. Like lololol. I did cause why not. Her mom shows up and just laughs and is like "what do you say?". Kid is like "Thank you".
Extremely random but funny situation. Kids honestly don't know any better sometimes. That's why when parents freak the fuck out that they are talking to you I always kind of wonder if they like grasp not everyone is trying to talk to your kid or even the one engaging in the first place.
WHAT IN THE WIDE WORLD OF FUCK
He should've fucking sued too. Like, sued the guy, the police, the fucking workplace, even the damn child.
I think that's backwards. Originally it might have been concerned with custody assumptions, female-on-male domestic violence, and other situations where men might be at a disadvantage, but I think when the Internet came along it turned toxic.No, it is not. MRAs exist for a very specific reason.
The other--legitimate--stuff was picked up after the fact.
And when you do, those parents will bitch a storm that you didn't just talk to the child instead.Well I think I've learned my lesson, next time I see a lost child I'll call the police
There is no hesitation in resorting to violence even when you understand you might be wrong? If you assault me because I tried to help your kid, your beer and aspirin aren't going to keep you out of jail on my account. Beating the guy was alright by you, but the mean Facebook posts were too much. smh.First thing would have done was assault the guy as well. When it comes to my children, there is no hesitation.
However, after hearing how he tried to help me and my family, I would offer him a beer and some aspirin. Too many people out there are afraid of being wrong, to the point where they don't even pretend to show guilt or remorse for their incorrectness. He went too far when he decided to defame him on social media.
This is the true effects of a "Trickle down" society; even when you're wrong, if you're angry enough and ruin the opposition's credibility, some people will believe you are right.
I'm not entirely sure I understand what this post is going for.
As much as I generally call for mercy... this guy was absolutely wrong not to press charges.
This type of rabidly aggressive parenting needs to end immediately.
Part of me thinks a few of you guys need to have a little more self-confidence to know you're doing a positive thing by helping a kid and to tell those people you think are giving you a look to fuck off.
If the Samaritan was Indian or of South Asian heritage, that adds another layer. South Asian men are frequently stigmatized as being creepy, 'foreign', unclean, and sexual perverts. I can understand why he wouldn't want to pursue this further.
Basically, this:
The point is that this is not a valid justification for the assault to begin with, much less his behavior after the fact. "I was protecting my daughter!" does not excuse or in any way diminish the criminality of the behavior, any more than me saying "I was trying to protect his daughter" would; less, because given that he's shown himself to be prone to outbursts of abrupt violence, I at least have some thin justification for assuming he beats his kids.
He should go to prison, get torn into financially in civil suits for the post-assault slander, and frankly Child Services should do a walk-through of his child's home and school environment to make certain it's safe, given that her father is a violent moron.
Can't say I've ever heard or seen this before. Must be region specific.
But yeah the double standard for men with children is pretty crazy. People give side eyes to men with their own kids if there is not a lady with them is crazy. Men can't just go help a lost, hurt, or other instances, child without second thinking it if at all which own its own can cause other problems. Heck even professionally, people question "Why would a man want to be an elementary/kindergarten teacher" or child physician.
Can't say I've ever heard or seen this before. Must be region specific.
Part of me thinks a few of you guys need to have a little more self-confidence to know you're doing a positive thing by helping a kid and to tell those people you think are giving you a look to fuck off.
Yep, as others have said, this is why as as black man, I ain't helping anybody or anyone's lost kids. Don't need that bullshit in my life.
Damn son
Yeah, as a minority dude I'm only helping a kid who looks almost like me, at least in the States lol
I would absolutely press charges against this guy , sounds like a huge asshole.
I have a daughter, and I have to say my first instinct would be to attack him.
but even after it was concluded he was atually trying to help, I wold have been etremely apologetic and thankful. Even thinking about someone taking her makes my blood boil, but to learn he was preventing that exact thing from happening, my gratitude would be in the same level as well.
So I understand where he is coming from, but he is an asshole.
First thing would have done was assault the guy as well. When it comes to my children, there is no hesitation.
However, after hearing how he tried to help me and my family, I would offer him a beer and some aspirin. Too many people out there are afraid of being wrong, to the point where they don't even pretend to show guilt or remorse for their incorrectness. He went too far when he decided to defame him on social media.
This is the true effects of a "Trickle down" society; even when you're wrong, if you're angry enough and ruin the opposition's credibility, some people will believe you are right.
is it weird to me that the good Samaritan just moved his family and didn't press charges?
I am a really laid back, non-confrontational person, but if I was completely innocent, had been assaulted and defamed, I would be getting a lawyer and pressing charges instantly, especially considering there are witnesses to back up my story.
I get this weird hair on the back of my neck going up when a story says "hey innocent person gets screwed, then does actions that a guilty party would do... (aka leave town).
Sounds like you and he have the same problem and inappropriate reaction to things.
Yeah, try watching your daughter being led away from where you are by a strange man and see if your first reaction would be to calmy walk up to the gentleman and ask "hello good sir, perchance you my explain why are you leading my daughter away?"
I get this weird hair on the back of my neck going up when a story says "hey innocent person gets screwed, then does actions that a guilty party would do... (aka leave town).
Yeah, try watching your daughter being led away from where you are by a strange man and see if your first reaction would be to calmy walk up to the gentleman and ask "hello good sir, perchance you my explain why are you leading my daughter away?"
is it weird to me that the good Samaritan just moved his family and didn't press charges?
I am a really laid back, non-confrontational person, but if I was completely innocent, had been assaulted and defamed, I would be getting a lawyer and pressing charges instantly, especially considering there are witnesses to back up my story.
I get this weird hair on the back of my neck going up when a story says "hey innocent person gets screwed, then does actions that a guilty party would do... (aka leave town).
So basically "I still suspect this traumatized person who has been cleared by the police because he's choosing the path of least resistance."
This type of thinking is part of the problem.
Dude has rabid members of his community threatening him and a father who has already beaten him once and has expressed the desire to kill him. I can see why he'd want to GTFO and not incite further violence, even through justified legal retribution.
The samaritan's name is ------------, so a pretty good chance that he's brown. Can't help but think that factored into it...
Cleared by police and being innocent are two different things... but I do understand your point about the path of least resistance. However, this isn't just a simple path of least resistance. You are talking about a town and people that have completely defamed you and are inciting violence against you. If I was fearful of my life, I would possibly move (or hire private security) and then press charges with an additional suit for damages I incurred by hiring additional security. I can understand "least resistance" for most situations, but if the accusations are completely un-true, you would need to fight them with everything you have... Imagine some accuses you of a terrible crime, do you run ? Or do you fight for your innocence?
So my gathering from this is that the father both prioritizes his daughter's safety over everything, but also apparently had something more important to do than keep her safe from wandering off.
The proper thing to do isn't to completely ignore a lost child, because you're afraid of being labeled a predator.
What you do is call the police, and keep a visual on the child.
What you don't do, is just walk around with the kid.
p.s. - the father should be charged for losing the kid, and for assaulting the guy
How about you also don't lose your daughter?
Did you miss the part where he rounded up a fucking posse to square off with the guy before the confrontation? The fact he apparently had already coordinated with his buddy that the buddy should be the one to grab his daughter so he could go in swinging free?
If your instinct when you're confronting someone with two of your dipshit friends is to go hard in the paint from the opening bell, you need to work on yourself. And I'm telling you this as an asshole who likes getting into pointless fights.
I didnt see anywhere in the article where he says he coordinated anything with his buddy? It says that one man grabbed the child and hte dad punched the guy. And again, stressing what I said, my first instinct is to attack, it doesnt mean I would do exactly what this guy did, going in swinging with 3 friends. Bt I would not calmly go to him asking what was happening. Also, a quote from the article: "According to police the young girl tried to pull away but the man was concerned for her safety and picked her up and continued walking toward the playground, hoping that he would be able to locate the childs father.
If you saw your daughter, trying to pull away from a strange man and being picked up, do you really think no emotion was necessary in this situation? Come on now. its not an either or situation, thats why I said, I think what he did after learning the guy wanted to help was wrong, doubing, and social media, and all that, but I see why he was overcome with fear and panic. I dont want to assume, but are you saying he should not have gone in wanting to fix the situation, no matter how stupid the way he chose to do it was?
Cleared by police and being innocent are two different things... but I do understand your point about the path of least resistance. However, this isn't just a simple path of least resistance. You are talking about a town and people that have completely defamed you and are inciting violence against you. If I was fearful of my life, I would possibly move (or hire private security) and then press charges with an additional suit for damages I incurred by hiring additional security. I can understand "least resistance" for most situations, but if the accusations are completely un-true, you would need to fight them with everything you have... Imagine some accuses you of a terrible crime, do you run ? Or do you fight for your innocence?
So my gathering from this is that the father both prioritizes his daughter's safety over everything, but also apparently had something more important to do than keep her safe from wandering off.