Wrekt said:Please don't be covenant, please don't be covenant, please don't be covenant..
Most likely no Covenant. This is a different galaxy, near a Forerunner-looking planetoid, and a 'new' trilogy.
Wrekt said:Please don't be covenant, please don't be covenant, please don't be covenant..
Glix said:Everyone saying its going to be the old engine...
Do we know ANY details on who owned the engine and stuff like that. Its possible that they CANT use the old engine, no?
bobs99 ... said:Where did this come from?
TUROK said:You know, you have a point. Halo 4 should not be an FPS, it should be a train simulator.
I don't think it will be. All of the old characters were left back at Earth. This is a new series with new characters. I am thinking something along the lines of Forerunners. Or, a third and undiscovered group.Wrekt said:Please don't be covenant, please don't be covenant, please don't be covenant.
Glix said:Everyone saying its going to be the old engine...
Do we know ANY details on who owned the engine and stuff like that. Its possible that they CANT use the old engine, no?
Marleyman said:I am going with Forerunners controlled by the Flood. Forerunners left thinking they got away from the Flood but a spore or something was on one of their ships.
I just hope they can at least lock the frame rate at 30...nothing below ever. Reach had it's drops..(FF)op_ivy said:pretty sure MS/343 got the reach engine to use as they please going forward. frankie said on gttv that they arent talking about what engine halo 4 is using right now, but it sounded like a modified version of reach's - which is fine as its a powerful engine.
I welcome a 60 fps transition.Game2Death said:I just hope they can at least lock the frame rate at 30...nothing below ever. Reach had it's drops..(FF)
shaowebb said:ANOTHER Halo?
claviertekky said:I welcome a 60 fps transition.
We'll see once we see some in game footage next year.Trunchisholm said:No way they're going 60fps. I don't buy that they're just using a modified Reach engine either. That would be a waste of talent after having hired such luminaries as Corrinne Yu.
shaowebb said:ANOTHER Halo?
![]()
shaowebb said:ANOTHER Halo?
![]()
Sai-kun said:You made the exact same post in two different Halo threads. You must have some issues.
People hate popular series they do not get. More news at 11.Sai-kun said:You made the exact same post in two different Halo threads. You must have some issues.
Frankie's Weekly Updates were the best.MagniHarvald said:Can't wait for these two games, I would love Frankie to start doing 343iWUs![]()
Yearly releases. Also, just because other publishers do it doesn't mean people can't complain.Kenak said:People hate popular series they do not get. More news at 11.
It's funny because these complaints can be applied to any blockbuster series.
"More Metal Gear?"
"More Final Fantasy?"
"More Kingdom Hearts?"
"More God of War?"
Halo 3 -> Halo Reach -> Halo 4 are the mainline games. Halo 3: ODST and now Halo CE: Anniversary are in between titles with the same multiplayer. Kind of like how Metal Gear Solid does a Subwhatever edition, except here they change the campaign instead of simply adding to it.CoffeeJanitor said:Yearly releases. Also, just because other publishers do it doesn't mean people can't complain.
op_ivy said:pretty sure MS/343 got the reach engine to use as they please going forward. frankie said on gttv that they arent talking about what engine halo 4 is using right now, but it sounded like a modified version of reach's - which is fine as its a powerful engine.
wonder what Bungie's initial reaction was when they found out 343/MS were pissing all over the ending of Halo 3 and starting up the cash cow again.
The only reason Halo is getting back to back releases is because the franchise is in the process of being transferred to a new developer.CoffeeJanitor said:Yearly releases. Also, just because other publishers do it doesn't mean people can't complain.
Considering how Halo 3 ended, probably expecting it since it continues from right where it left off?macewank said:wonder what Bungie's initial reaction was when they found out 343/MS were pissing all over the ending of Halo 3 and starting up the cash cow again.
And because it consistently rakes in truck loads of cash for Microsoft. It's hard to deny that they're milking it. The question is why everyone cares so much when other popular franchises do the same without the backlash.Lingitiz said:The only reason Halo is getting back to back releases is because the franchise is in the process of being transferred to a new developer.
Kenak said:People hate popular series they do not get. More news at 11.
It's funny because these complaints can be applied to any blockbuster series.
"More Metal Gear?"
"More Final Fantasy?"
"More Kingdom Hearts?"
"More God of War?"
Halo 4 continues exactly where Halo 3 left off. What, do you think Bungie didn't see that as a cliffhanger or something?macewank said:wonder what Bungie's initial reaction was when they found out 343/MS were pissing all over the ending of Halo 3 and starting up the cash cow again.
So how about you describe the differences and actually partake in discussion, rather than blindly disagreeing?ToyBroker said:No...no they can't.
Yeah, I think Bungie knew Microsoft was going to continue making more. Based on sales they have no reason not to. This is why they closed him in that cryo tube and his last words were "wake me when you need me." Since Frankie (one of the main guys from Halo 2 and 3) went from Bungie to 343 I (want to) believe Halo 4 will turn out just fine. Microsoft knows they can't let this franchise get diluted too much and die. Halo made Xbox and as such the quality must remain high.Kenak said:Considering how Halo 3 ended, probably expecting it since it continues from right where it left off?
Lyphen said:Halo 4 continues exactly where Halo 3 left off. What, do you think Bungie didn't see that as a cliffhanger or something?
macewank said:wonder what Bungie's initial reaction was when they found out 343/MS were pissing all over the ending of Halo 3 and starting up the cash cow again.
Yeah they are milking the series but I doubt that we will see another Halo 5 until 2014 or 2015 with new hardware. There is usually a 3 year break between mainline games but it all changed with the developer hand off.Kenak said:Considering how Halo 3 ended, probably expecting it since it continues from right where it left off?
And because it consistently rakes in truck loads of cash for Microsoft. It's hard to deny that they're milking it. The question is why everyone cares so much when other popular franchises do the same without the backlash.
It used to be much worse when it was the most popular FPS. Sony and PC fanboys trolled it whenever and wherever possible, now that Halo isn't seen as a threat anymore, they cut the games some slack.Kenak said:Halo 3 -> Halo Reach -> Halo 4 are the mainline games. Halo 3: ODST and now Halo CE: Anniversary are in between titles with the same multiplayer. Kind of like how Metal Gear Solid does a Subwhatever edition, except here they change the campaign instead of simply adding to it.
Look at God of War: First one in 2005, then one in 2007, then a release of both in 2008, 3 in 2009, and now we're getting a 4th if rumors are true. Then we also have the portable titles. For a title significantly less popular than Halo.
People are shitting on it because it's Halo; because it's a supersoldier in power armor, because it's a FPS, and because it's popular.
g.r.e. said:I don't know you, guys, but my body is ready to start another fight. With Chief.
Snuggler said:Kinda how I feel. I'm fond of the series, but it's hard to get excited about a new Halo, numbered or not, when we've had a new Halo release in 3 of the last 4 years. I could get excited if they waited a couple years and announced it for the new system, but whatev, it's not like I'm forced to buy it until then anyways.
Trasher said:Wake me...
![]()
When you need me.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Cool pistol, bro.
![]()
Wait...what?!
![]()
BOOM
![]()
Time to reload.
![]()
![]()
ToyBroker said:No...no they can't.
Sai-kun said:You made the exact same post in two different Halo threads. You must have some issues.
Oblivionmancer said:The ending where Chief said 'wake me when you need me?' C'mon, really. Not to mention the fact that Bungie was considering Halo 4 for their next project before going with Reach.