Halo 4: Review Thread

...Okay dude, this needs to stop.

You spent practically an entire week in the Skyward Sword review thread nearly creaming your pants giving hints that you were going to give it a less than perfect score, and almost openly wishing for "death threats" with statements with all the sincerity of, "Boy, I hope a beautiful sorority doesn't come by and have sex with me!"

You back came running into the thread with the pride of a schoolboy telling mama he got honor roll to jubilantly announce that you'd gotten nasty emails (which we're all sure were real death threats and not trash talk identical to any XBL match) and how "scared" you were, like a giggling teen discussing the latest Paranormal Activity.

We get it already Feep. You've told us your harrowing tale of you nearly died from badly misspelled comments and emails but then you narrowly evaded them about fifty times now. You can come down off your cross now.
Ether
 
Jim Sterling can give a shity note to a good game just because he want to and everybody think its ok but because its an untouchable game like halo with a shit load of frustrated fanboys, its another story?

The dude from EGM just said what he doesnt like about the game, like it or not... I dont see the drama about it even for the iron sights.

When Jim says something as braindead stupid as Halo needs to be more like CoD, then we can talk. And is your argument really that because Jim is an idiot, we should accept that other people are idiots too? Did ya think that through before you posted it?
 
Jim Sterling can give a shity note to a good game just because he want to and everybody think its ok but because its an untouchable game like halo with a shit load of frustrated fanboys, its another story?

The dude from EGM just said what he doesnt like about the game, like it or not... I dont see the drama about it even for the iron sights.
First of all what review from Jim Sterling are you referencing here? I have no idea.

Second, that guy gets criticized all the time for his reviews so I don't know what you're talking about.

Third, 'frustrated fanboys?' Really?

Finally, reviewers are welcome to their opinions; but that doesn't mean we can't look at the points they're making and decide if they make sense or not. You can look at reviews with a critical eye.
 
...Okay dude, this needs to stop.

You spent practically an entire week in the Skyward Sword review thread nearly creaming your pants giving hints that you were going to give it a less than perfect score, and almost openly wishing for "death threats" with statements with all the sincerity of, "Boy, I hope a beautiful sorority doesn't come by and have sex with me!"

You back came running into the thread with the pride of a schoolboy telling mama he got honor roll to jubilantly announce that you'd gotten nasty emails (which we're all sure were real death threats and not trash talk identical to any XBL match) and how "scared" you were, like a giggling teen discussing the latest Paranormal Activity.

We get it already Feep. You've told us your harrowing tale of you nearly died from badly misspelled comments and emails but then you narrowly evaded them about fifty times now. You can come down off your cross now.

Brilliant
 
Wow, that review.... Only thing I can agree with is there is a serious Tron vibe in the Forerunner levels. Everything looks like a Recognizer. Other than that, yeah I get it.... He doesn't like it. 1 out of 5, though? WTF!? That's basically saying it's on the level of Duke Nukem or worse. Talk about being melodramatic.

Edit: Yeah I know it's his opinion. Well, my opinion is he's melodramatic. Thanks for your opinion, never-heard-of website.
 
I think what makes me upset or angry about the review is just the fact that when they call him out for content it's chalked up to "Oh wow, well look at these gamers, I have a different opinion and give their favorite franchise a 7 and now they're all mad."

At least that's the attitude that bothered me, since clearly the uproar was due to the reviewer's own ignorance.

There's a word for this but I just can't remember what it is.. hmm.
 
I and lots of people at 343 have shot lots of real guns, lots of times. And lots of different kinds.

And I'll bet that none of those times did you have a +5 D...

No. That line is getting old already. I'll just have to live with it. Damn you for making Halo so cray.
 
I like Tom Chick, not his writing, (he has the communicative skill set of a clothes peg), but his scoring. Far too much of the press use the first eight tenths of the scale on technical competency, then the last two on 'subjective' quality it seems. Tom Chick treats it like a film review. No one questions the competency of a film, Prometheus doesn't automatically get an 8/10 or better just because it didn't fundamentally fuck up. Film reviewers will happily give the big, wildly loved, technically well made films, terrible scores, because those things are presumed and completely irrelevant.
 
Uhh yeah, don't read that if you don't want to be spoiled. I've got no issue with the content of Chick's review though, nothing shitstormy about it to me.

Isn't this one of those people who actually though Mass Effect 3's ending was fantastic? And did I just get spoiled on the entire plot of the game? Fuck.

Yeah seriously, there seem to be pretty big spoilers in there.

Lol, might be a master troll. Bring the fans in to read such a low score then BAM hit them with a spoiler.
 
I have no problems with these low scores, but part of me cant help but think maybe some of these review sites are just looking for hits, it is Halo after all.
 
I have no problems with these low scores, but part of me cant help but think maybe some of these review sites are just looking for hits, it is Halo after all.

Eh, getting extra website hits by giving a major title a low score is not the issue here. It is content of his review that is making people shake their heads. If he had scored the game based on what the actual game is about then fine; but to go into a game review and complain that it is NOT more like the other popular franchise (in this case it was COD) is just shit.

Also Tom Chick is a dolt.
 
can we just ignore this one? please?

guy clearly saw the attention EGM guy got, now he wants to be the center of attention

also people are saying it has spoilers so yea


You might want to read this before writing off the review.

I like Tom Chick, not his writing, (he has the communicative skill set of a clothes peg), but his scoring. Far too much of the press use the first eight tenths of the scale on technical competency, then the last two on 'subjective' quality it seems. Tom Chick treats it like a film review. No one questions the competency of a film, Prometheus doesn't automatically get an 8/10 or better just because it didn't fundamentally fuck up. Film reviewers will happily give the big, wildly loved, technically well made films, terrible scores, because those things are presumed and completely irrelevant.
 
I like Tom Chick, not his writing, (he has the communicative skill set of a clothes peg), but his scoring. Far too much of the press use the first eight tenths of the scale on technical competency, then the last two on 'subjective' quality it seems. Tom Chick treats it like a film review. No one questions the competency of a film, Prometheus doesn't automatically get an 8/10 or better just because it didn't fundamentally fuck up. Film reviewers will happily give the big, wildly loved, technically well made films, terrible scores, because those things are presumed and completely irrelevant.

Last time I checked Roger Ebert give it 4 stars to Prometheus
 
Tom Chick is pretty well known as a kind of "troll" reviewer. However he's kind of like Yahtzee in that even though he's absolutely shitting all over every game he actually brings up a lot of valid points.

I'm not reading that review because of spoilers, but I look forward to giving it a look after I finish the game.
 
Shame that these piss-poor reviews drag down the meta-critic.. Im not talking about bad scores, Im talking about shitty reviews. Its now at an 88.. Really hope 343's bonuses weren't tied to Metacritic.
 
Tom Chick is pretty well known as a kind of "troll" reviewer. However he's kind of like Yahtzee in that even though he's absolutely shitting all over every game he actually brings up a lot of valid points.

I'm not reading that review because of spoilers, but I look forward to giving it a look after I finish the game.

He's in no way like Yahtzee. Yahtzee exhibits creativity, intelligence, and humor.
 
The put this: (SPOILERS) behind the link.

The point of a review thread shouldn't be to selectively put the best reviews in the OP.

It's not about selectively picking. If some asshole gave away ending spoilers in a 10/10 review, I wouldn't post it either.

Fucker has no concern for people who actually care about the story. It's inexcusable.

Nonetheless, I put it in the OP with all Caps warning.
 
...Okay dude, this needs to stop.

You spent practically an entire week in the Skyward Sword review thread nearly creaming your pants giving hints that you were going to give it a less than perfect score, and almost openly wishing for "death threats" with statements with all the sincerity of, "Boy, I hope a beautiful sorority doesn't come by and have sex with me!"

You back came running into the thread with the pride of a schoolboy telling mama he got honor roll to jubilantly announce that you'd gotten nasty emails (which we're all sure were real death threats and not trash talk identical to any XBL match) and how "scared" you were, like a giggling teen discussing the latest Paranormal Activity.

We get it already Feep. You've told us your harrowing tale of you nearly died from badly misspelled comments and emails but then you narrowly evaded them about fifty times now. You can come down off your cross now.

ibryKUSitMfkhU.gif
 
It's not about selectively picking. If some asshole gave away ending spoilers in a 10/10 review, I wouldn't post it either.

Fucker has no concern for people who actually care about the story. It's inexcusable.

Nonetheless, I put it in the OP with all Caps warning.

If you dont want to include it, don't. Don't let someone pressure you into doing it.
 
I just thought I would chime in and tell everyone to shut the hell up already.

This discussion is pointless. Halo 4 is the videogame industry's equivalent to a hollywood blockbuster. Discussing reviews of this game is pointless and idiotic. We're talking about a flashy, obnoxious, and expensive game. This game is pure spectacle (like a hollywood blockbuster) and that is completely fine. In fact, I'll be one of the morons waiting in line at midnight tomorrow to get a copy.

Reviews are not objective. Reviews are not scripture. Its frightening how much some of you people are indoctrinated into the... I don't know "ideology" of this product. Gaming commodity fetishism? This is not the videogame equivalent of Citizen Kane people. This is just a dumb game where you run forward and shoot aliens.

Also, everyone having this objective vs. subjective debate needs to grow some god damn brains. It shows that you know nothing about journalism, literature, or writing in general.

I also realize I am mostly talking to 15 year old boys right now. At least I hope you guys are 15. You are 15, right?
 
Top Bottom