ElRenoRaven
Member
So a bit OT but interesting news. Phil Harrison joins Microsoft and Takes Peter Molyneuxs place running Microsoft's European studios.
I don't think Halo 3 social matchmaking uses TrueSkill, does it?
Yeah, I should have put more emphasis on the 4v4 part. For some reason people like to mention Big Team when talking about Longshore, but 4v4 1 Flag and 1 Bomb were a blast! There were so many ways to attack the base. I remember Ghost-rushing Grav Lift and OS, charging the nearest ramp into the base, throwing the bridge switch and jumping off the window sill to the top level, grabbing the flag and escaping up to the bridge with the Grav Lift. And that's Halo.Fixed
Yeah, I should have put more emphasis on the 4v4 part. For some reason people like to mention Big Team when talking about Longshore, but 4v4 1 Flag and 1 Bomb were a blast! There were so many ways to attack the base. I remember Ghost-rushing Grav Lift and OS, charging the nearest ramp into the base, throwing the bridge switch and jumping off the window sill to the top level, grabbing the flag and escaping up to the bridge with the Grav Lift. And that's Halo.
Another reason to get dedis.I was playing earlier, got anniversary slayer on Hang Em High, host kept changing, and we all ended up with completely loaded shotguns lolololol. I'm guessing weapons respawn when host changes?
He hasn't taken over Moly's role.So a bit OT but interesting news. Phil Harrison joins Microsoft and Takes Peter Molyneuxs place running Microsoft's European studios.
Update 2: An Edelman spokesperson wrote to us, stating Harrison's new role is "completely unrelated to Peter's departure." Microsoft will "determine if and when the Microsoft Studios Europe Creative Director vacancy should be filled." Furthermore, the spokesperson explained that Molyneux's position as Lionhead manager is currently filled by chief operating officer Mark Webley.
People with a k/d below 1 shouldn't be allowed to vote.Wonder what 343 thinks about the current voting system...
Oh, so now you like the perks system.People with a k/d below 1 shouldn't be allowed to vote.
Meh, he's overrated by many.That guy is awesome, you hear me? Awesome!
I was playing earlier, got anniversary slayer on Hang Em High, host kept changing, and we all ended up with completely loaded shotguns lolololol. I'm guessing weapons respawn when host changes?
Meh, he's overrated by many.
I was playing earlier, got anniversary slayer on Hang Em High, host kept changing, and we all ended up with completely loaded shotguns lolololol. I'm guessing weapons respawn when host changes?
"How the eff does this even function?!"Wonder what 343 thinks about the current voting system...
As in you kept picking them up then a new host change? Cos weapons do spawn on host change. It's really frustrating at times.
Yes, I'm still upset the last map pack was held back so long. And I'll never understand the point of Assembly with Heretic coming just after it. Assembly (and Zealot for that matter) just came off as wannabe Midships.
Wonder what 343 thinks about the current voting system...
Wonder what 343 thinks about the current voting system...
I laughed, and then I cried.Armor Lock is only made for Pros with Recon ,
Armor Lock is great for Recon , When ever i am attacked randomly from somewhere , I use Armor Lock to analyze the situation , And see where the enemies are and if i will be able to kill them with a certain weapon ,
Just saw this comment on Youtube:
I laughed, and then I cried.
Trueskill.
I want to see more choices for maps (not game types) on the voting screen. Sad to say though that I don't trust Halo gamers to vote for the good choices so I hate matchmaking/voting anyway.
Elite slayer over and over and over and over
Oh, so now you like the perks system.
5 matches of Halo 3, boundless came up 4 times, Ewww.
5 matches of Reach, Uncaged voted for 4 times.
I was very excited for the voting system, but I've begun to feel that it actually reduces the variety you experience in matchmaking. It's largest flaw is that it also basically eliminates objective gametypes from playlists with slayer and objective [ BTB ;( ] in them due to the player base being nothing short of peons that slam the vote on the top slayer option.
Perk: Your vote is the only one that counts. Game of forever.
5 matches of Reach, Uncaged voted for 4 times.
I was very excited for the voting system, but I've begun to feel that it actually reduces the variety you experience in matchmaking. It's largest flaw is that it also basically eliminates objective gametypes from playlists with slayer and objective [ BTB ;( ] in them due to the player base being nothing short of peons that slam the vote on the top slayer option.
Fun fact: on average, a player that doesn't want to play objective will leave a list after getting objectives twice, and never comes back to that playlist.
Hence why if it's a mixed list, Slayer is usually always in the top slot, and why lists tend to start Slayer-only and only get objectives afterwards. The Halo base just massively prefers Slayer.
Indeed
No.I like Reach's voting system but would prefer the 2 round system in which round 1 is for a game type and round 2 is for a map. The more maps available in round 2 the better.
Sad.
Jeremiah found a way around it in BTB by making objective gametypes mostly what came up, and almost always having those at the top. Unfortunately, 343 decided to move away from that.
Indeed
BTB seems kind of weird that Objectives come up a decent amount of time. I wonder if it's because since there's more people, the Slayer junkies can just get 'lost in the crowd' and the game still mostly works out for them.
The cogency of your argument has forced me to not only reevaluate my opinion of Halo voting systems but also of my entire life. Thank you. Thank you.
Also: no bleed-through kills this game for me (again). Not having fun in Super Slayer. Double beat down may only happen once or twice a game but it still sucks. Would rather have no health packs on TU maps and have bleed through. The game would be more fun that way.
Why not just have a server browser in addition to matchmaking then? It'll get you into what you want to play quicker while retaining the full games of matchmaking.
Voting options should be maps in combination with a gametype that works great on it. Voting for them separately will lead to bad combinations.The cogency of your argument has forced me to not only reevaluate my opinion of Halo voting systems but also of my entire life. Thank you. Thank you.
Voting options should be maps in combination with a gametype that works great on it. Voting for them separately will lead to bad combinations.
Does anyone else here feel shafted by the latest MM update? I don't have a decent playlist I can fall back to anymore. Squad Slayer was it for me; TU settings and only a few AA's. It was glorious. Now we've got its inbred cousin, Super Slayer. I'm finding myself playing either Infection or Anniversary FFA now for lack of desire to play any of the other game types. I would play MLG if I didn't constantly get matched against full teams.
Feels like Shishka levels of playlist bungling in here (almost), so what would HaloGaf do if they were in charge?
Here's what I would do:
-I would completely nuke non TU (it's the only way to be sure).
-Remove all AA's apart from Sprint and Hologram.
-Increase speed+jump height.
And for actual playlists:
I would set it up kinda like COD. So instead of Competitive, Community, Cooperative, etc, you'll have Slayer, Objective, Hardcore and a place for party gametypes.
-Slayers pretty self explanatory just have different team sizes (FFA, 2v2, 4v4, 5v5, 6v6 and 8v8).
-Objective will be 2v2, 4v4 or 8v8 (with appropriately sized maps) and sub playlists of Bomb, Flag, Ball or Mixed.
-Hardcore would be MLG, SWAT and Snipers.
-Party (for lack of a better name) would have Race, Infection and a mixed playlist of stuff like Juggernaut, Headhunter, Stockpile and all the other trash I've forgotten.
And that's all I've got for now. Come at me, GAF!
Failing that. GIVE ME SQUAD SLAYER BACK!
Voting options should be maps in combination with a gametype that works great on it. Voting for them separately will lead to bad combinations.
Dani, what's your avatar?Halo is 10 years old today (in Europe).
http://www.littleenglishhaloblog.com/2012/03/march-14th-2002.html