Many on the GAF love to hate. One can hope for change but I wouldn't hold your breath.
"The problem with the HUD is that Dyack is a fat bastard. Haven't you heard?" - does it ever get any more GAF then this? (I think (at least hope

) this was sarcastic.
I want to qualify that I believe that there are many here are very reasonable and great to interact with - in the end that makes the GAF worth it at times.
The media is relative to what we are discussing in each blog. We check the shots in general to make sure there are no serious flaws - however, there are higher priorities for us, rather then worry about rabid GAFers thinking a texture is not high res enough. Many of the screen shots that so many here get excited about with other games are clearly faked. We decided that we were not going to do this - if it hurts us to be honest then so be it - it is something we can live with.
We are confident when most gamers play Too Human in motion they they will be very happy with what we have created. Understanding the type of game we are is almost always lost here too:
1) 4 Player Co-op
2) Hunting Gathering Loot Collecting
3) Class Customization
4) Fast Action Combat with many enemies
5) Very rich content
We get compared to Heavenly Sword or MGS which make no sense at all to me. I understand we might look similar in some ways but they are vastly different games.
I wish there was some form of reciprocity with all this technology at our finger tips. Henry said to me the other day that one problem I face is that the ideas I am vocal about are by nature complex and require understanding of the subject matter at hand and about 1hr of dialog to communicate properly (commodification, previews/marketing of games, our content theories, etc...). The press try to translate these thoughts and summarize them for the masses. Many details and facts of the ideas are lost. Some of these these summaries have resulted in things like "Dyack claims Too Human will change the Industry" or that "Dyack wants to kill previews", all which are not true or factual.
I really wish i could speak to some of the posters here directly so that I could help them understand the ideas that I am trying to convey. The intent would not be to convince them that I was correct but rather to explain the basic premises of what I suggesting so they could decide for themselves.
My GAF post for the weekend.
Denis