Speaking of Turtledove-y stories, could we do a Worldwar show next?
Those books were cool.
Those books were cool.
Try doing more than citing an amendment as if that's a substitute for presenting an actual argument to support your position, sport.
13th amendment said:Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
Are they seriously going to try to paint SLAVE OWNING TRAITORS as some kind of righteous people try trying to make it day by day?? Fuck the very concept of this show. I'm sick and tired of people writing stories that either are based in reality where black people get brutalized(12 Years a Slave) or these white supremacy power fantasies. We're either a background prop or a whipping boy for most of Hollywood. Its disgusting.
...You can get literally anything greenlit and you decide to dive straight back into problematic race issues, issues which your show never quite figured out.
It just depresses me when creators waste their carte blanche like this.
When has has something similar happened? I'm genuinely curious.
I hope they at least take some lessons to heart from their problematic game of thrones stuff.
like:
Those six words are the feeble justification for an inane comment like "did the Confederacy really lose?"Me: did the people fighting to keep slavery really lose?
You: yes
Me: *laughs at you in 13th amendment *
You are clearly do not have the range for this subject. Educate yourself kthx
Their last show:
Newly freed brown slaves worshipping their white savior.
gonna be a hard pass for me
What do you call The Man in the High Castle?
Those six words are the feeble justification for an inane comment like "did the Confederacy really lose?"
So you watched a Netflix documentary on modern incarceration, vastly overstated an actual criticism into an objectively false statement, defended the position with an oddly unjustified condescension, and now you believe you're in position to tell another person to educate themselves.
It's astounding.
I don't understand this on any level. Why would anyone want to watch a version of history that's even worse for slaves? What is the goal with this?
You reached for the "...but you're mad" stage of defense in one response rather than admit error.lol I literally grew up across the street with a house with the confederate flag flying in their yard. Grew up in a county where Some parts I could go easily go missing. I'm not sorry if the statement bothered you or anyone else so build a bridge and get over it.
Also lol @ you thinking my education on this is limited to a Netflix documentary. Get hot and bothered about how I said what the hell I said because nobody has offered any substantive argument about what I said was false
You reached for the "...but you're mad" stage of defense in one response rather than admit error.
Your statement was objectively false. The Confederate States of America as an independent nation state ceased to exist in 1865. The 13th Amendment outlawed slavery and indentured servitude as commonly understood today, with a notably awful exception pertaining to the incarcerated having the right to object to work withheld. The racism that fueled the Confederacy's rebellion and also existed a mere one or two notches weaker in the Union didn't die in 1865, nor was it even dealt a significant wound.
The last sentence doesn't render the first two false.
Same reason why people would watch Handmaid's Tale or read Underground Airlines.I don't understand this on any level. Why would anyone want to watch a version of history that's even worse for slaves? What is the goal with this?
lol I literally grew up across the street with a house with the confederate flag flying in their yard. Grew up in a county where Some parts I could go easily go missing. I'm not sorry if the statement bothered you or anyone else so build a bridge and get over it.
Also lol @ you thinking my education on this is limited to a Netflix documentary. Get hot and bothered about how I said what the hell I said because nobody has offered any substantive argument about what I said was false
Edit: lolololol y'all are so upset at me saying the confederacy didn't lose when their flag was flying on several state public grounds only a few years ago ( and some still do IIRC)
Wait, people think the right is going to latch on to this show?
The right is going to hate this show with the power of a thousand suns.
Except for those who don't get it, a la watching The Colbert Report while agreeing with everything Stephen says.
Same reason why people would watch Handmaid's Tale or read Underground Airlines.
These kinds of alternate histories are pretty much always cautionary tales that use the speculative fiction to show how terrifying, immoral, and disturbing these scenarios would be.
I'm tired of this slave shit.
I don't understand what about the description given in the article gives you and others this impression.
It's more about the context. I can't imagine an HBO show premiering during the Trump era will not portray a victorious Confederacy as an evil empire.
Right, they'll be portrayed as clever and there will definitely be some sympathetic characters. Why would the right hate that?
Like Claus von Stauffenberg?
Me: did the people fighting to keep slavery really lose?
You: yes
Me: *laughs at you in 13th amendment *
"What if Hillary won?" is the only alternate history story I'm interested in.