• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Hi-Def Media Lovefest: The war is over and we can all go home.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Laurent

Member
It could be typical damage control on his part... Just because we can't prove otherwise doesn't make it false, nor true... And he doesn't have proof either, does he? He is on vacation for christ sakes! :lol
 

jjasper

Member
Laurent said:
It could be typical damage control on his part... Just because we can't prove otherwise doesn't make it false, nor true...

Exactly we will never know for sure. People will assume both ways, but at this point it really doesn't matter.
 

StoOgE

First tragedy, then farce.
jjasper said:
Exactly we will never know for sure. People will assume both ways, but at this point it really doesn't matter.

considering they are a publicly traded company, they cant just outright lie about something like this.
 
jjasper said:
He can say that all he wants but with multiple reports stating the $150million not many are going to believe him.
Except that he's not denying that someone paid Paramount. He (along with the other Microsoft insiders on AVS) is saying that Microsoft didn't pay.
 

ManaByte

Member
StoOgE said:
considering they are a publicly traded company, they cant just outright lie about something like this.

Yes they can (at least people here are convinced they can).

chinaismine said:
Except that he's not denying that someone paid Paramount. He (along with the other Microsoft insiders on AVS) is saying that Microsoft didn't pay.

Exactly and everyone (ESPECIALLY the digital bits) are pointing fingers at MS.
 

Crayon Shinchan

Aquafina Fanboy
If you believe that guy, then you probably believe MS when they said there was nothing wrong with the X360 as well.

"Y'know. Things just break."

MS has the money and the interest. They don't necessarily have to pony up the whole 150 million, nor do they have to pay Paramount directly.

They simply put funds in the HD-DVD pool and mark them for 'corporate takeover' use, while suggesting to the HD-DVD group that they should consider money-hatting one of the neutrals.

Unless the mainstream media get hold of hard facts like they did with the X360 break down rates and start reporting on the issue, MS aren't going to admit diddly-squat. Trouble is, the hard facts in this case is going to be a little more tricky to get hold of.

Why wouldn't MS want to deny culpability in the matter? admission that money hats were passed around would weaken the marketing line the group has carefully prepared.
 

jjasper

Member
StoOgE said:
considering they are a publicly traded company, they cant just outright lie about something like this.

We will never know because what if MS funneled the money through the DVD forum or HD DVD group (or whatever it is called) and it is with all the other money they have invested in it.

The money came from somewhere but where else could it have come from? Does Toshiba or Universal have that kind of money to throw around? Even if Universal did would they give it to a competing company?

Like I said though at this point it doesn't matter, they can say they didn't for how ever long they want some people will and some won't believe them. I think you know who will be on which side.
 

Laurent

Member
jjasper said:
Exactly we will never know for sure. People will assume both ways, but at this point it really doesn't matter.
But he's been a home theather enthusiast since forever! He must be telling the truth about his company...
 

mrklaw

MrArseFace
Cheaper, higher yield and greater availability of replication. A perfect case point for this is the European market where there are a multitude of HD DVD titles that are only available from the BD studios in the US. The reason for this? Cheaper replication costs and the ability to use local replicators to produce disc

what kind of spin is this? Availability of BD studio movies in Europe is nothing to do with replication costs. Its all to do with distribution rights outside of the US.


And who cares about actual pressing costs? Surely its only the cost to the studio that counts, and I thought the BDA were making sure they ate some of the cost so that the overall pressing costs for studios were roughly on par?
 

Xater

Member
distantmantra said:
Soooo... how 'bout them movies?

Just paid off my preorders for Black Book and Tekkonkinkreet on Blu-ray...

I don't know about you but I can't wait for the new Blade Runner cut. 5 Disc set with pretty much every cut in existence of the movie and alot of extras is a dream that came true.
 

bill0527

Member
The guy is a techie.

Its highly unlikely he has any dealings or knowledge of what goes on among executive management (where $150 million decisions are made).
 
Xater said:
I don't know about you but I can't wait for the new Blade Runner cut. 5 Disc set with pretty much every cut in existence of the movie and alot of extras is a dream that came true.

Yeah, me too. I actually paid the rest of that off too. I took the piggy bank in my office to the local CoinStar machine and converted it into an Amazon e-certificate. Paid off my preorders for Tekkon Kinkreet, Black Book, Wings of Honneamise and Blade Runner.
 

Laurent

Member
I'm pretty sure he's right about most of the stuff he said... The fact that HD-DVD are easy to replicate, Blu-ray are only being manufactured in two warehouses, yadiyadiyada...
 

XMonkey

lacks enthusiasm.
mrklaw said:
And who cares about actual pressing costs? Surely its only the cost to the studio that counts, and I thought the BDA were making sure they ate some of the cost so that the overall pressing costs for studios were roughly on par?

And from a consumer standpoint, the differences in replication aren't even passed on because Bluray maintains price parity with HD-DVD (or in the case of combos, beats it).
 

XMonkey

lacks enthusiasm.
distantmantra said:
Soooo... how 'bout them movies?

Just paid off my preorders for Black Book and Tekkonkinkreet on Blu-ray...

Is Tekkonkinkreet a domestic US release, or import only for now? I got to see it on 35mm and it would be an injustice to see it in anything less than HD.
 
Xater said:
Seeing this cover (I know nothing about the movie) I reminded me that today I had Paprika in my hands. Is it any good? (sam question for Tekkon)

I loved Paprika and really enjoyed Tekkonkinkreet. They're both "out there" anime, so keep that in mind.
 
Where can one get Blu-Ray anime(Especially Bleach) in Canada? I only like Bleach, Naruto(ew), One piece(funny). And they're all Shonen though so I'm not sure.
 

Doctor_No

Member
The Main Event said:
From the Home Theatre Forum:

The reasons given by that post are BS. MS' main gripe against Blu-ray is their unwaivering support for BDJ. Which would put Java into virtually every living room if Blu-ray succeeds. Much more fearful is that if Blu-ray finds a home on PCs if it wins this format war (as DVD players have replaced CD players); then a large majority of PCs will have JRE installed to play Blu-rays. However, as far as this Paramont deal. There is no evidence of MS' involvement. More importantly, Toshiba is absolutely flush with money.

Toshiba just won a $9 billion deal to make nuclear reactors for the Chinese governent. They also made a billion dollar deal with the Kazakhstan's government for secure supply of Uranium (in exchange for 10% of their Toshiba-Westinghouse unit). On top that, their NAND business is growing rapidly; showing a good fight against Samsung's dominant NAND unit. As the main beneficiary of the 6C, and any HD-DVD deal, they are the likely key player in this deal.
 
CrushDance said:
Where can one get Blu-Ray anime(Especially Bleach) in Canada? I only like Bleach, Naruto(ew), One piece(funny). And they're all Shonen though so I'm not sure.

You can't. There aren't any shonen fighting anime or any TV series for that matter available on Blu-ray. So far, it's been theatrical movies only.
 
jjasper said:
We will never know because what if MS funneled the money through the DVD forum or HD DVD group (or whatever it is called) and it is with all the other money they have invested in it.

The money came from somewhere but where else could it have come from? Does Toshiba or Universal have that kind of money to throw around? Even if Universal did would they give it to a competing company?

Like I said though at this point it doesn't matter, they can say they didn't for how ever long they want some people will and some won't believe them. I think you know who will be on which side.
With gross profits of over 14 billion dollars in 2006 Toshiba could easily afford a 150 million dollar payment.
 

ManaByte

Member
bill0527 said:
The guy is a techie.

Its highly unlikely he has any dealings or knowledge of what goes on among executive management (where $150 million decisions are made).

Kevin Collins is basically in charge of everything connected to HD-DVD within Microsoft.
 

Oni Jazar

Member
jjasper said:
We will never know because what if MS funneled the money through the DVD forum or HD DVD group (or whatever it is called) and it is with all the other money they have invested in it.

Of course. Microsoft didn't offer Paramount any deal. The HD DVD Associasion* did. I wonder if the true details of the deal would ever become public.

*HD DVD Association is funded in part by Microsoft.
 

Laurent

Member
ManaByte said:
Kevin Collins is basically in charge of everything connected to HD-DVD within Microsoft.
How conveniant that he is in vacation... Maybe he'll be replaced by... STEVE NICKERSON!!!!1!!1!!
 
Crayon Shinchan said:
Wow. Toshiba are richer than I thought.

If that's the case, those jerks need to just money hat everybody and make a united format.

Amen. Sony will (eventually) fall in line with everybody else on board. Do it, Toshiba!

BTW, where does this info (surprising to me) leave those underdog-backers? MS and Toshiba are underdogs?
 

Crayon Shinchan

Aquafina Fanboy
Ignatz Mouse said:
Amen. Sony will (eventually) fall in line with everybody else on board. Do it, Toshiba!

BTW, where does this info (surprising to me) leave those underdog-backers? MS and Toshiba are underdogs?

Thiavo will be thiavo. Specious reasoning is a forte of his.
 

Alcibiades

Member
Universal, who is in charge of the HD DVD Promotion Group, already said that if Paramount and Dreamworks made any money or advertising deals, it wasn't with HD DVD group.

Most likely, Toshiba made some advertising deals with Dreamworks to use the Shrek and/or Transformers characters to sell players and maybe bought some discs to use for bundles or giveaways.

It's also possible Microsoft is providing tech support for Paramount, but they do this with all VC-1 supporting studios anyway...

The $150 million rumor is probably a combination of these things, although whatever contracts were signed were probably between Toshiba, Viacom (owner of Paramount and Dreamworks Pictures), and Dreamworks Animation (completely separate company).
 

StoOgE

First tragedy, then farce.
Does Viacom own CBS as well?

I know they dont produce all of their own stuff, but they have to own some series.. how I met your mother on HDDVD, please?
 

Laurent

Member
StoOgE said:
Does Viacom own CBS as well?

I know they dont produce all of their own stuff, but they have to own some series.. how I met your mother on HDDVD, please?
Wikipedia is your friend...

Wikipedia said:
In 2000, CBS came under the control of Viacom, which coincidentally had begun as a spin-off of CBS in 1971. In late 2005, Viacom split itself and reestablished CBS Corporation with the CBS television network at its core. CBS Corporation and the new Viacom are controlled by Sumner Redstone through National Amusements, the parent of the two companies.
Still, the contract is with Paramount. This doesn't force Viacom (or it's owner) to submit contents from their other companies exclusively to the HD-DVD format, but it might be much simplier that way...
 

Chemo

Member
Crayon Shinchan said:
If that's the case, those jerks need to just money hat everybody and make a united format.
For fucking real. As LITTLE sense as it makes for the unified format to be HD DVD, they need to just get it over with already if they're going to bankroll this shit.

One. Format. Future. Please.
 

jjasper

Member
StoOgE said:
Does Viacom own CBS as well?

I know they dont produce all of their own stuff, but they have to own some series.. how I met your mother on HDDVD, please?

yeah they do, but How I Met Your Mother is Fox distributed though.
 

Alcibiades

Member
StoOgE said:
Does Viacom own CBS as well?

I know they dont produce all of their own stuff, but they have to own some series.. how I met your mother on HDDVD, please?
no, Viacom split into 2 corporations a couple of years ago: Viacom & CBS Corp.

CBS Corp. is "slow growth" tv networks like CBS, CW, and Showtime, etc...

Viacom is "fast growth" businesses like Paramount/Dreamworks, MTV, Nick, etc...


That said, CBS, IIRC uses some Paramount label to distribute their shows.
 

Mrbob

Member
The format war is still undecided...oh shit wait....

71:29 Blu-ray

YTD is 67:33
SI is 61:39

1. 300 BD 100.00
2. Wild Hogs BD 77.63
3. 300 HD 45.18
4. Vacancy BD 21.34
5. Disturbia 16.96
6. PE BD 15.22
7. The Lookout BD 12.29
8. TMNT BD 11.89
9. PE HD 10.95
10. Doctor Strange BD 10.77

xx Disturbia HD 7.88
xx TMNT HD 5.17
xx Hot Fuzz HD 5.10
xx Bourne Identity HD 4.51
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom