Ignatz Mouse
Banned
Marty Chinn said:
That's annoying, but I can't say it diminished my (already only moderate) enjoyment of the movie any.
If this were Blade Runner or something I would be up in arms.
Marty Chinn said:
Marty Chinn said:Pirates of the Carribbean misframed! Nobody cares?
But in BTTF's case, it was obvious... Which reminds me, I need to call Universal ASAP, it's been almost 2 years since I send those DVDs!Oni Jazar said:I hate this crap. I would have never noticed until someone mentioned it. Now it bugs me.
Same damn thing happend to Universal's Back To The Future collection.
He is really stretching here. His argument about the exclusivity of content is the same with BD. How upset is someone going to be when they purchase a $150 movie player, and see they can't get Disney? Somewhat perhaps, but not as much as someone investing in a $500 player that doesn't play Paramount, Dreamworks or Universal... and can't run features of BD 1.1...And on the high-def front today, there's a couple things to report as well. First, Video Business is reporting that the first cheap Chinese HD-DVD player will street sometime in the 4th quarter of this year under the "Venturer Electronics" brand. The SHD7000 is expected to retail for $199. You can visit Venturer's actual product page here. The low price is certainly going to be attractive to some, but one wonders how people who purchase this player will react later upon realizing that only a handful of studios support the format and that Disney (among other studios) isn't one of them. Other questions remain, including what kind of quality and reliability the SHD7000 will deliver at that price, which is almost certainly at or below cost of manufacturing, as well as what kind of customer support will be offered.
Laurent said:But in BTTF's case, it was obvious... Which reminds me, I need to call Universal ASAP, it's been almost 2 years since I send those DVDs!
Laurent said:But in BTTF's case, it was obvious... Which reminds me, I need to call Universal ASAP, it's been almost 2 years since I send those DVDs!
I was a bit late on that, it's been two years. I still have the email giving me the procedure to follow in order to get my replacements, but I never received anything. Meanwhile, I forgot about the whole thing until recently...Oni Jazar said:Are they still offering replacements? I never did mine. The DVDs are hidden in some closet at my dads.
Well if it's the back of a stuntman's head in a dark action scene, it's not that noticeable...Marty Chinn said:In several shots heads are getting cut off in POTC so it surprises me it didn't get noticed till now.
hdtvuk said:It will play both disc formats at up to 1080p and either 24fps (so-called true film mode) or up to 60fps, dependent on disc content. It also features HQV video selectable up-conversion processing.
Audio-wise, it has both stereo and 7.1-channel outputs, coaxial and optical digital audio out, and supporting Dolby Digital Plus, Dolby TrueHD, and dts HD.
Do most here think that when 1.1 or even 2.0 are released, they might be competitive with current pricing, or perhaps even be less than current pricing?VanMardigan said:So, why does it seem like a lot of the announced BR players today were still 1.0 profile and still $400 plus?
Was it just one 2.0 profile player announced?
thaivo said:Do most here think that when 1.1 or even 2.0 are released, they might be competitive with current pricing, or perhaps even be less than current pricing?
To me, the introduction of these new specs appear to counter the movement toward price reductions, and are likely to keep prices high for some time. Is it possible prices of these new spec'd players may approach dual format player prices?
- There are more than 10 companies in the process of making stand-alone BD players, several at the request of major retailers. Most of these companies will have at least two models.
- Lots of things are being to done to reduce BD player cost as much as possible as fast as possible. For example, we are working closely with the CE companies, drive manufacturers, and DRAM/Flash suppliers to remove every penny from the player cost that we can. And we don't charge a royalty for our software, and use Linux OS, to further lower player costs.
:lolQuestion to BDA: it's about Paramount/Dreamworks. People speculated that Paramount were given 'sweeteners''. The person asking wants a Yes or No answer from all of the studios - have you been 'sweetened' to stick exclusively with Blu-ray?
Answer: Nobody wants to answer this.
The FOX exec is given the mic: "We were given very good content protection" (smiles).
(They continue passing the mic around).
Question to BDA: The guy who originally asked the question wants a definite confirmation that NO studio has received any sweetener to stay with Blu-ray.
Answer from Buena Vista: "That's not what I said. I said no comment".
thaivo said:Recent Bill Hunt: http://digitalbits.com/#mytwocents
He is really stretching here. His argument about the exclusivity of content is the same with BD. How upset is someone going to be when they purchase a $150 movie player, and see they can't get Disney? Somewhat perhaps, but not as much as someone investing in a $500 player that doesn't play Paramount, Dreamworks or Universal... and can't run features of BD 1.1...![]()
His comment that the price is below the cost of manufacturing is ludicrous. This company is not producing these players out of the kindness of their hearts, and they do not have the back-end profits of format royalties either.
KachoMakura said:Question to BDA: The guy who originally asked the question wants a definite confirmation that NO studio has received any sweetener to stay with Blu-ray.
Ignatz Mouse said:thaivo, are you immune to the idea that CE prices drop very quickly after the inital R and D? And not just for HD DVD players?
Marty Chinn said:
Ignatz Mouse said:Look! High-end *and* low-end options for buyers!
maynerd said:Which is which?
First of all, I haven't watched nor do I intend to buy that movie (DVD or Blu-ray, I don't care about Pirates)... Second of all, FUCK, this is ridiculous!!!!!!!!Marty Chinn said:
Marty Chinn said:BR version is the ones where they cut off the heads.
maynerd said:WTF?! That's really awful!
This is odd....which pirates movie is this?
Marty Chinn said:I wouldn't call these the back of stuntmens' heads....
thaivo said:Isn't BD 1.1 mandatory?![]()
AZ Greg said::lol
Edit: Beaten!
Ignatz Mouse said:Make up your mind-- it's either some players won't be 1.1 and won't play the interactive trivia game, or 1.1 is mandatory and thus all the players will be more expensive.
I'm getting confused trying to keep up with your stance.
OokieSpookie said:It looks more like those are taken by someone who is playing with "stretch" and "zoom", not that they are but just what it looks like.
thaivo said:You are indeed a confused individual. :lol 1.1 was to become mandatory as of a specific date. To suggest that my comment meant that 1.1 features would be mandatory to players produced prior to that date would be very silly.:lol
Ignatz Mouse said:I know, thaivo, but do you really think that will matter much, or (this is my guess) just throwing out as much anti-bd propaganda as you can today? As you like to point out, "standalone" sales of bd to date is relatively small.
And the 1.1 stuff is not the kind of stuff that drives up player prices, unless you buy into the whole two-decoders thing (which you probably do).
I think it's funny you pointinf out Bill Hunt's stretch (accurately) when you've been doing nothing but making stretching comments all day today.
Ignatz Mouse said:Total ludicrousness is how I'd describe your posts today, as well.
I didn't see Van's post, but there was both an announcement of Chinese BD players today and a reference that retailers are requesting low-end models from a number of manufacturers. Nothing concrete announced, but then again, the price of the cheap HD DVD player hasn't been announced officially either.
As I said months and months ago, I expect we'll see $300 MSRP players by Black Friday, and deals to make them even cheaper. By the end of 2007, you'll never see more than a $100 gap between the formats again, at least until the HD DVD fire sales.![]()
I guess I could say the same of your posts too.Ignatz Mouse said:Total ludicrousness is how I'd describe your posts today, as well.![]()
The price of the cheap HD DVD players was announced previously, and confirmed by the manufacturer to be $199 MSRP, which likely means even lower at retail.Ignatz Mouse said:...but then again, the price of the cheap HD DVD player hasn't been announced officially either.
Then you must be predicting a BD player for $250 retail, since the Venturer players are likely to be around $150 retail. This is something that I'd like to see.Ignatz Mouse said:... you'll never see more than a $100 gap between the formats again, at least until the HD DVD fire sales.![]()
:lol :lol :lolOokieSpookie said:also because the excessive use of emotes was making me want to throat punch and curb stomp someone.
The Main Event said:
Good luck with that expectation.Ignatz Mouse said:I think Ookie has the right idea.
And yes, thaivo, I expect MSRP $300 BD players by Christmas, and rebates/sales/deals to make them even less. $250 sounds about right.
jjasper said:You can get e-certs from Coinstars now? i didn't know that.
thaivo said:Good luck with that expectation.![]()