bill0527 said:
Yeah but that's a pipe dream and I've never seen every single content provider in the world line up for one unified format upon its creation, at least not in my lifetime. Any time there's a new major media format introduced, the players all choose their respective sides and may the biggest wallet and PR machine win.
Yup.
I think Opus has the fact right, but not the meaning behind it.
As I said, Content drives sales, studios provide content. But the studios' initial decision is based on yet more (complex) factors and Blu-ray was better at putting them together.
The moneyhatting came relatively late in the game, apart from some to-be-expected subsidation to get things going. Sony (obviously) chose their parent, Fox and Disney for content control, WB was theoretically neutral based on their focus on advanced features pushing catalog titles (and when BDj or whatever stalled, they released a lot more HD-DVD_, Paramount was neutral, and I'm still not sure why Universal backed HD-DVD. Onec WB and Fox titles started flowing, and prices dropped, there was a semi-deadlock. Moneyhatting was the dynamite to try to break the deadlock. Blu apparently needed less dynamite to shift things their way, since the deadlock started with them having the advantage. In a way, all that studio confusion helped BD-- if more studios were neutral to start, HD-DVD may have gotten momentum enough from lower player prices to pull too far ahead from Blu. But the stalemate worked in Blu's favor, because over time, HD-DVD's major advantage-- price-- has withered away.