Snah said:Lots of stuff
Frankfurter said:Chill out dude. You are taking this way too serious.
DarkJediKnight said:NO PS3 or 360 Add on. HD DVD loves to talk about "standalones"? Look at the numbers BEFORE the Warner announcement.
Cold-Steel said:Have you ever heard of the term HTIB?
It applies to the majority of the population (aka: reality), not enthusiasts like everyone posting in this forum.
Also, enthusiasts can be poor too (see HD-DVD).
It's been fascinating to watch how the tech press has largely decided to make a martyr out of HDDVD.border said:Could they throw the guy anymore softballs?
"Warner backstabbed you!!!111"
"When will consumers have a voice??"
Oni Jazar said:Jesus what questions.
*smacks head*
DarkJediKnight said:
NO PS3 or 360 Add on. HD DVD loves to talk about "standalones"? Look at the numbers BEFORE the Warner announcement.
Keen said:My head is bleeding from reading just three pages from that forum. How the hell can people get that worked up over fucking hd-formats???
I mean, one guy even claimed moral superiority over people who bought sony equipment! :lol Holy fuck!
It's like two kids bickering over whose dad can beat up the other's
Ignatz Mouse said:Neither side has any moral superiority whatsoever.
Onix said:I disagree.
Many feel Tosh should have never pushed a format war, especially based on how the DVD agreement happened in the past.
And certainly now, it makes 0 sense for Tosh to be doing what they are doing.
Keen said:My head is bleeding from reading just three pages from that forum. How the hell can people get that worked up over fucking hd-formats???
Battlezone said:Wasn't there a guy on the "blu" side that printed flyers, got up early, stood in line at Walmart, handed out said flyers, tried to convert people to buying Blu-Ray, and then when like one person did, got on the Internet and crowed about it, to a massive ovation from like-minded supporters?
Or am I just imagining that?
Can you explain that a little more? I'm interested.Onix said:I disagree.
Many feel Tosh should have never pushed a format war, especially based on how the DVD agreement happened in the past.
And certainly now, it makes 0 sense for Tosh to be doing what they are doing.
Battlezone said:Wasn't there a guy on the "blu" side that printed flyers, got up early, stood in line at Walmart, handed out said flyers, tried to convert people to buying Blu-Ray, and then when like one person did, got on the Internet and crowed about it, to a massive ovation from like-minded supporters?
Or am I just imagining that?
Can you explain that a little more? I'm interested.
Also, what's broken about the 3rd gen HD DVD deinterlacing exactly?
Onix said:I disagree.
Many feel Tosh should have never pushed a format war, especially based on how the DVD agreement happened in the past.
And certainly now, it makes 0 sense for Tosh to be doing what they are doing.
maharg said:And Sony should have pushed a format war? Just because they won doesn't mean they should have done it in the first place. There was a time, before anyone was really sure they'd put BD into the PS3, when things looked a lot more likely to go the other way. Was Sony the bad guy then?
It takes two to tango.
Battlezone said:Wasn't there a guy on the "blu" side that printed flyers, got up early, stood in line at Walmart, handed out said flyers, tried to convert people to buying Blu-Ray, and then when like one person did, got on the Internet and crowed about it, to a massive ovation from like-minded supporters?
Or am I just imagining that?
Ignatz Mouse said:We have no evidence that Sony or others wouldn't have acted the same under the circumstances. We know that both companies engage in practices to their own benefit.
dallow_bg said:Can you explain that a little more? I'm interested.
Also, what's broken about the 3rd gen HD DVD deinterlacing exactly?
maharg said:There was a time, before anyone was really sure they'd put BD into the PS3, when things looked a lot more likely to go the other way. Was Sony the bad guy then?
It takes two to tango.
maharg said:And Sony should have pushed a format war? Just because they won doesn't mean they should have done it in the first place. There was a time, before anyone was really sure they'd put BD into the PS3, when things looked a lot more likely to go the other way. Was Sony the bad guy then?
It takes two to tango.
ManaByte said:Please, it's Raistlin you're responding to. Of course Sony should have pushed the format war.
Ignatz Mouse said:"Hey guys, there's a dead horse over here! Let's beat up on it!"
I'm not done beating it yet! :lolIgnatz Mouse said:"Hey guys, there's a dead horse over here! Let's beat up on it!"
BoboBrazil said:Toshiba really needs to stop misleading the customers.
Toshiba hardware is pretty bad too. I've had every model hd-dvd player at my work and all of them just randomly freeze and give some weird error during movies. You can't restart the movie from the same point either...Working with electronics, Toshiba makes some of the worst products of any major brand name.
avaya said:Toshiba had every right to push ahead with their format.
They shouldn't have though since it was always a losing proposition. They failed to agree with Matsushita, Philips and Sony at the discussion table in May/June 2005 because Toshiba didn't want to go with the 0.1mm structure....they wanted BD software with HD-DVD disc structure: This left the BDA with the same royalty pool structure that existed with DVD. No incentive for BDA companies to comply.
Toshiba's PR excuse peddled by Amir ad nauseum is that Matsushita wouldn't show them evidence that 0.1mm would work (for BD50). BD-50 was science fiction. This is such a bullshit excuse.
Business Week commented that it was the ego of the chief DVD architect at Toshiba (whose name escapes me) that didn't want to concede on disc structure since it was his creation. One man's ego destroyed the whole thing.
Looking at it from Toshiba's side, if they conceded disc structure they get only minor revenues from the adoption of HD-DVD software spec. There was no incentive to go for it on their side.
However in terms of ethics when they found themselves so obviously mismatched on an intra-industry scale they should have conceded before it began.
Maybe the only good thing to come out of this is that 2 lesson's have been learned:
1. Don't pick the opposite side from a Matsushita coalition.
This is the 2nd time Toshiba ended up the loser, they were the only supporter of Sony in Beta. Toshiba was actually aware of crossing paths with Panasonic till Microsoft started whispering in their ear...this leads to the second lesson...
2. Don't trust Microsoft
Microsoft didn't get to the top playing it by the book. Divide and conquer, subterfuge and forced acquisitions are part of their ruthless business strategy. Microsoft is one of the best companies in the world to work for due to this reason. Frankly 'tis fucking wondrous how they go about their business.
Onix said:If you keep on beating a dead horse ... eventually it'll twitch :lol
That is my major objection with their current moves (beyond failing to just end it outright)
They've historically made some pretty nice TV's at their pricepoint.
BoboBrazil said:Working in electronics their tvs and av equipment have the most breakdowns and service issues of any name brand. Their picture quality on their tvs are also not as good as lg, sony, or samsung...
BojTrek said:I want to post with happy news...
Monsters Inc. (DVD) looks incredible up-converted from PS3 to my Sony 40" BRAVIA XBR 1080p KDL-40XBR4
Holy Crap! It looks almost Blu-Ray... I was really impressed...
I am going to throw in Star Wars or The Incredibles to see how they look up-converted...
I am still very happy with my TV purchase and PS3 purchase as my Blu-Ray player and main DVD player... WOW!
Oh... and hey Ignatz... how were those Police tickets?
avaya said:Toshiba had every right to push ahead with their format.
They shouldn't have though since it was always a losing proposition. They failed to agree with Matsushita, Philips and Sony at the discussion table in May/June 2005 because Toshiba didn't want to go with the 0.1mm structure....they wanted BD software with HD-DVD disc structure: This left the BDA with the same royalty pool structure that existed with DVD. No incentive for BDA companies to comply.
Toshiba's PR excuse peddled by Amir ad nauseum is that Matsushita wouldn't show them evidence that 0.1mm would work (for BD50). BD-50 was science fiction. This is such a bullshit excuse.
Business Week commented that it was the ego of the chief DVD architect at Toshiba (whose name escapes me) that didn't want to concede on disc structure since it was his creation. One man's ego destroyed the whole thing.
Looking at it from Toshiba's side, if they conceded disc structure they get only minor revenues from the adoption of HD-DVD software spec. There was no incentive to go for it on their side.
However in terms of ethics when they found themselves so obviously mismatched on an intra-industry scale they should have conceded before it began.
Maybe the only good thing to come out of this is that 2 lesson's have been learned:
1. Don't pick the opposite side from a Matsushita coalition.
This is the 2nd time Toshiba ended up the loser, they were the only supporter of Sony in Beta. Toshiba was actually aware of crossing paths with Panasonic till Microsoft started whispering in their ear...this leads to the second lesson...
2. Don't trust Microsoft
Microsoft didn't get to the top playing it by the book. Divide and conquer, subterfuge and forced acquisitions are part of their ruthless business strategy. Microsoft is one of the best companies in the world to work for due to this reason. Frankly 'tis fucking wondrous how they go about their business.
bu bu bu bu bu DVD Forum called HD DVD the official successor lolzxemumanic said:Very well stated. Say what you will about Sony, but it was Toshiba and Microsoft who started the format war to begin with. Sony was actually working with the industry.