Remy said:
:lol Well I don't really know if that means much since they put TiVo on a deathwatch too.
Remy said:
Xisiqomelir said:On the contrary, his insistence on Blu-Ray is going to make Sony billions upon billions of dollars over the next decade and Stringer should beg for the privilege of blacking KK's boots with his tongue.
Onix said:He going to go down as being far more important than just the Playstation family.
Cosmic Bus said:Amazon UK has listings for Pulp Fiction and Kill Bill Vols. 1 and 2 at the end of March. Doubtful that they're actually coming out that soon, though, since there's absolutely no info regarding the releases. Certainly not for a while in the US.
ManaByte said:I thought Blu-ray wasn't a "Sony format" though?
ManaByte said:I thought Blu-ray wasn't a "Sony format" though?
Bebpo said:I really miss the lack of Kutaragi already. He was the person I most respected in the game industry and his drive to push technology into the future is sorely missed.
I want flying cars, holograms, and trips to mars! But I fear without Kutaragi it'll take twice as long to get them.
Ignatz Mouse said::lol at Mana trying to pick a fight.
deserved to be shit canned? Its not or wont be in third for very long either, takes your sales age bullshit elsewhere.Days like these... said:Slightly OT
but what is up with all Ken K revisionist adoration? He is the reason the ps3 is in third place and he deserved to be shit canned. I'm not real sure about him being one of the richest people on the planet either but hey whatever helps you sleep better...
Wow. And I thought you'd changed.ManaByte said:I thought Blu-ray wasn't a "Sony format" though?
Chemo said:Wow. And I thought you'd changed.
ManaByte said:Just trying to point out what looked to be a contradiction in this thread. People were screaming that it wasn't a "Sony format" previously, but now it looks like they've changed their tune.
Where, exactly, was the tune changed? Just because Sony stands to make money from Blu-ray doesn't mean it's just their format.ManaByte said:Just trying to point out what looked to be a contradiction in this thread. People were screaming that it wasn't a "Sony format" previously, but now it looks like they've changed their tune.
I get what you're trying to say but it just sounds like a desperate attempt to argue with someone.ManaByte said:Just trying to point out what looked to be a contradiction in this thread. People were screaming that it wasn't a "Sony format" previously, but now it looks like they've changed their tune.
Onix said:Mind pointing out how the tune has been changed?
ManaByte said:Prior to the BRD win, if anyone brought up that Sony is the primary backer in the BDA people would jump on them and say they're wrong and BRD isn't a "Sony format". Now it's different. Just look at the last couple pages. It looks like the GAMING FORUM in this thread with the amount of Kutaragi and PS3 talk/
user friendly said:To answer your question, Sony is a small part of the BDA but at 20%, they are the biggest part of the BDA.
ManaByte said:So I guess now that Blu-Ray won, it's OK to call it a Sony format? Because you know, it is.
I just found it hilariously stupid how people in this thread would jump to try to defend it by trying to distance it from Sony.
If only that's what more people said in the past, there wouldn't have been as many people correcting them. But most of the people you're referring to labeled BD as nothing more than a Sony format with no acknowledgment of any other BD contributors/backers.Manabyte said:if anyone brought up that Sony is the primary backer in the BDA
umm...... even if it continued to outsell the 360 (which it won't for the near future) at the same rate as it did in January, it will take MULTIPLE YEARS for it to catch up to 360 in the US. And it has STILL never outsold Wii in US.captive said:deserved to be shit canned? Its not or wont be in third for very long either, takes your sales age bullshit elsewhere.
captive said:deserved to be shit canned? Its not or wont be in third for very long either, takes your sales age bullshit elsewhere.
avaya said:Worldwide Distributors
N.B. All announcements taken as effective now
In the grand scheme of things, this is a pretty small success. Though I will agree with you to a point. I would definitely credit stringer with turning around what could have eventually been the self-destruction of one of the world's biggest companies, in part to both the stabilization of the PS3 and the eventual win of BRD as the sole niche HD format. Now the question remains will he be able to take BRD past niche status in the face of DD and DVD and will he be able to grow the PS3 into more than an also ran in the console market.Days like these... said:I'd give Strnger the credit for Sony's success.
Days like these... said:That's right shit canned. I'm responding to the people who are giving him more credit than he deserves. I thought he was behind CELL not Blu-Ray? The decision to include it in the ps3 (for better or worse) was not his. It was made by the higher ups. Like I said though if proclaiming him Sony's savior helps some of you sleep better more power to you. I'd give Strnger the credit for Sony's success.
Gamespot 20.6.2005 said:Kutaragi also talked about his decision to adopt Blu-ray for the PlayStation
3 rather than wait a bit longer to see if the Blu-ray and HD-DVD factions
would come to a final conclusion on a unified disc standard. "E3 was the
last chance," Kutaragi said. "The PS3 is the console of the future, so I
wanted an extreme amount of capacity. But for that, we need cutting-edge
technology, and not technology that is currently available. My suggestion
was to come to an agreement with a physical format that is as close to [the
Blu-ray's] 0.1mm as possible. But the PS3 launches in spring 2006. If we had
continued to wait for a unified standard, we wouldn't be able to release the
PS3. We no longer have any more time. It's game over."
Kutaragi strongly stressed that he has no plans to compromise on the
Blu-ray's 0.1mm physical format, which gives it the upper hand to HD-DVD in
terms of capacity. However, he said that he could wait until spring 2006 to
see if Sony and Toshiba could come up with a unified standard that's still
based on the Blu-ray's physical format. As long as the change is only in the
disc's logical structure, the PS3 can still adapt to it with some software
updates. Despite Kutaragi's comments, it's been reported that Toshiba and
Sony are still in negotiations on a standard format.
Panasonic, Samsung, Pioneer, Sharp, Philips and every other major CE company minus Toshiba say NO.ManaByte said:So I guess now that Blu-Ray won, it's OK to call it a Sony format? Because you know, it is.
you can tout as many companies as you want, but at the end of the day all that matters is who gets licensing fees from every player and disc sold. I'd imagine that list is much closer to the 8 or 9 names that have been mentioned here, with Sony getting the largest chunk of those fees. while calling it a sony format may be a little disingenuous, so is insinuating it's as much a format by committee as say DVD.polyh3dron said:Panasonic, Samsung, Pioneer, Sharp, Philips and every other major CE company minus Toshiba say NO.
ok, right... that's what I'm saying. And between those three, how much larger is sony's share than the other two's? Probably quite a bit.polyh3dron said:Panasonic, Philips, Sony
Panasonic, Philips, Sonyborghe said:you can tout as many companies as you want, but at the end of the day all that matters is who gets licensing fees from every player and disc sold. I'd imagine that list is much closer to the 8 or 9 names that have been mentioned here, with Sony getting the largest chunk of those fees.
borghe said:you can tout as many companies as you want, but at the end of the day all that matters is who gets licensing fees from every player and disc sold. I'd imagine that list is much closer to the 8 or 9 names that have been mentioned here, with Sony getting the largest chunk of those fees. while calling it a sony format may be a little disingenuous, so is insinuating it's as much a format by committee as say DVD.
ok, right... that's what I'm saying. And between those three, how much larger is sony's share than the other two's? Probably quite a bit.
polyh3dron said:There are some SERIOUS meltdowns going on at HDD. I recommend getting out the popcorn and going over there for some lulz.
polyh3dron said:Panasonic, Philips, Sony
Many of them were sad, Nico is funny.typo said:It is pretty funny, but I'm a little disturbed at how much people stand by their preferred format. At least Nico makes it funny.
typo said:It is pretty funny, but I'm a little disturbed at how much people stand by their preferred format. At least Nico makes it funny.
typo said:It is pretty funny, but I'm a little disturbed at how much people stand by their preferred format. At least Nico makes it funny.
Xisiqomelir said:Take it with a grain of salt. A lot of those guys literally are virals.
Xater said:On the Europe chart is an error. Universum is actually neutral. I have their Crank BD.
umm.. you're seriously reaching. Or you've virtually never participated in this thread before today. I entered into HDM with both formats on the exact same day (a 360 add-on and a 60GB PS3). I own exactly 26 HD-DVD's and 27 Blu-rays. I'm just not going to suck on Ken K's dick after he took what seemed like a sure thing at the time, leading Sony to another easy win in the console market, and threw them into an uncontrolled spiral landing them in a third place even more distant than Nintendo had been in for two generations.jeremy_ricci said:lol, even meltdowns here. borge and this other character shitting on Ken, dogging Sony, etc etc.
All because of this news :lol
polyh3dron said:There are some SERIOUS meltdowns going on at HDD. I recommend getting out the popcorn and going over there for some lulz.