From The Dust
Banned
so, I was thinking I should replace my Phenom 2 X2 925 sometime later this year. or would an overclock be suffice for gaming?
From The Dust said:so, I was thinking I should replace my Phenom 2 X2 925 sometime later this year. or would an overclock be suffice for gaming?
That depends on how you like the results that you're getting from your current build. Start with overclocking if you can, and move on from there.From The Dust said:so, I was thinking I should replace my Phenom 2 X2 925 sometime later this year. or would an overclock be suffice for gaming?
Oh, that would be the 2500T vs any other 2500/2600 variant. The 2500K is very similar to the standard 2500. Between the two, the "K" CPU's unlocked ability to overclock is also what allows you to get a big underclock if you want to lower heat and consumption.Kenka said:You partly answered my other question, thank you so much. So 2500K are supposedly more efficent than 2500 while having better overclocking potential (without going too much into details). Nice.
Up until a few weeks ago, I was working for a small computer store as a technician (kick-ass job for a high schooler,TheExodu5 said:Yup. Clock for clock, Sandy Bridge shames everything else at this point. It's too bad they still won't be available for a few months. On the upside, maybe AMD will release Bulldozer by that point. Has there been any word on when it's coming out?
I would expect it around then maybe june/july. Its gonna be an issue of seeing how they perform versus sandy bridge. They cant afford to just match or slightly outperform considering they are supposed to be 8 core chipsJackEtc said:Up until a few weeks ago, I was working for a small computer store as a technician (kick-ass job for a high schooler,). We were an AMD seller, and I think I heard my boss say something about April/May. I dunno if that's public information or not, or if it's even remotely true, but that's what he said. He was also kind of crazy, so take that with a grain of salt.
Streaming as in live video? Processor would help a ton, as it does with Fraps. That, and a good video card.Kadey said:You guys know anything about streaming? Would having a better processor help?
We should have some info within the next 2-3 weeks (possibly sooner, if I'm not mistaken), but that will mostly be generic performance graphs, estimates (like the same ~3.5GHz+ "capable" that has been hinted at since last year), and further architecture info. Kinda surprising that we haven't seen much in the way of legit BD sample leaks so far, since they've been out since around December. Hell, we've seen really early 6- and 8-core LGA 2011 chips, boards, and double-latched Lotes sockets. Seems we'll have to wait until March for things to start picking up.TheExodu5 said:Yup. Clock for clock, Sandy Bridge shames everything else at this point. It's too bad they still won't be available for a few months. On the upside, maybe AMD will release Bulldozer by that point. Has there been any word on when it's coming out?
TheExodu5 said:Start with the overclock. If you feel you still want the added performance, post again in this thread (with the games in question) and we'll help you out. You may or may not be limited by your CPU in the particular games in which you're interested. Bulldozer and Ivy Bridge (AMD & Intel's offerings) are coming out later this year, so the choices available to you will change over time.
·feist· said:That depends on how you like the results that you're getting from your current build. Start with overclocking if you can, and move on from there.
Plenty of users are fine with OC'd dual cores and less-than-cutting-edge GPUs
Sandy is definetly the way to go if you plan to upgrade this year. Ivy will be hitting around Jan or February for retail at least according to latest word. Since the Sandy Boards will be compatible with Ivy processors at least have options laterArken2121 said:Aye. I just thought i'd get a general consensus about how things might go within the next 6 months on whether to just get the sandy or wait for the Ivy.
Sandy is definetly the way to go if you plan to upgrade this year. Ivy will be hitting around Jan or February for retail at least according to latest word. Since the Sandy Boards will be compatible with Ivy processors at least have options later
·feist· said:We should have some info within the next 2-3 weeks (possibly sooner, if I'm not mistaken), but that will mostly be generic performance graphs, estimates (like the same ~3.5GHz+ "capable" that has been hinted at since last year), and further architecture info.
AMD missed a MAJOR opportunity by not having new, compelling product ready to capitalize on Intel's chipset slip up. Even if the actuall BD1 and Fusion desktop chips weren't on sale, they could have at least had AM3+, and, to a lesser extent, FM1 motherboards ready to go.
Kenka said:I really hope that Bulldozer will be compatible with the AM3 socket. If there is zero chance that it is the case and if those Bulldozer CPUs really do bring a worthy piece of additional performance just as Sandy Bridge did, I will consider to hold on the purchase of a new build until the fog fades away and we get precise information on all of this.
Is this confirmed ? If this is the case, then hurra, CPUs won't be the bottleneck of any build for years to come.antonz said:Sandy is definetly the way to go if you plan to upgrade this year. Ivy will be hitting around Jan or February for retail at least according to latest word. Since the Sandy Boards will be compatible with Ivy processors at least have options later
From The Dust said:I remember hearing they were supposed to be AM3+ sockets.
http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,2845,2368186,00.asp>Extremetech said:AM2 and AM3 processors will work in the AM3+ socket, but Bulldozer chips will not work in non-AM3+ motherboards.
Hazaro said:Well said.
The 80% degradation after 1 year seems shockingly high to me, how do you know this?[/U] I know that the 520 I have has 81% efficiency at 100% load iirc (I was going to sub 75% in actually) and that it takes heat pretty well.
LiquidMetal14 said:Overclocking makes everything better!
zsswimmer said:Hey guys I posted in the gaming laptop thread but I'm pressed on time so I'd thought I would post a simple question here.
How does the Nvidia gt 540M stack up versus the Nvidia gtx 260M?
Kenka said:
ThanksKenka said:The 260M is more powerful. But I don't know if it supports DirectX 11. If you want DirectX 11 with somehow unexpensive stuff, go for the Mobility HD 5650.
zsswimmer said:Thanks
The reason I was asking was because there is a laptop that is $1000 with better specs including the GTX 285M. The Acer is 650 with the 540M and a few other downgraded specs. Just wondering how big a difference it is between the two.
Hmm. I was looking at the HP Envy and it has the ATI HD 5650M card. Its around the same price as the MSI laptop. Do you know anything about MSI's rep, haven't heard too much about them? And for the same price the MSI has the i7 versus the i5, and 6 gigs of ram versus 4. Damn decisions!Kenka said:If your question was referring to the 285M, then you may consider both choices a bit more. The 285M is a very good card that will run most current games on med-high settings in a decent resolution (1366 x 720) but, again, doesn't support DirectX 11. Right now, with some bucks, you should aim for a card that allows you to behold the latest visual tricks. The HD Mobility 5650 is the current bang for bucks for portable GPUs but may get old pretty quickly. It's up to you, but if you value weight, maybe it is safe to go with this card for now. Make sure that you are able to upgrade it in the future though.
zsswimmer said:Hmm. I was looking at the HP Envy and it has the ATI HD 5650M card. Its around the same price as the MSI laptop. Do you know anything about MSI's rep, haven't heard too much about them? And for the same price the MSI has the i7 versus the i5, and 6 gigs of ram versus 4. Damn decisions!
JediMasterMatt said:Even apps that still rely heavily on my media servers, like my photo shares of RAW files for Lightroom, benefit from their install footprint being on the solid state
JediMasterMatt said:My computer has now caught an SSD. I'm not sure if it was from unprotected downloading or what, but it is bad.
In all seriousness, adding the SSD has been the most noticable upgrade I've ever done to any machine I've built. Everything is just fast as fuck now. Even apps that still rely heavily on my media servers, like my photo shares of RAW files for Lightroom, benefit from their install footprint being on the solid state.
There is no going back after you get a taste for what is possible on these bad boys.
The latest word is Sandy Boards will require a Bios update to run ivy chips but other than that will be fine. I Imagine it will have a few weaknesses like the lack of quad channel memory and such that Ivy boards will have but it is as you say a way to not be stuck with a useless board quickly.Kenka said:Is this confirmed ? If this is the case, then hurra, CPUs won't be the bottleneck of any build for years to come.
edit :
http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,2845,2368186,00.asp
Fuck.
Kenka said:Is it ? If you install a game on one of these drives, is the performance also improved ?
Unknown Soldier said:Games which constantly stream data from the HDD (read: MMOGs) benefit hugely from SSDs. Other games will have dramatically improved load time between levels. However, many games these days are console ports and are optimized for loading from a very slow optical disc and SSDs will do nothing for those.
That last one you posted, I'm not too familiar with amd cpus. I assume the phenom quad core is fairly powerful. Good price, definitely will be on my top list. Thanks for the informative posts man. In all honesty the most demanding game on my laptop now is bad company 2. Sounds like the 5650 would be fine for me.Kenka said:Mmmh, I am starting to understand where this is leading us to and I think you might consider this :
http://bizsupport1.austin.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?objectID=c02529128&lang=en&cc=us&taskId=101&prodSeriesId=4247579&prodTypeId=321957
It's probably less expensive than an Envy and it boasts a good processor. It has an HD 5650 in its insides and it should be found both in Europe and the US for less than 1000 $.
You have this solution as well but the CPU looks oversized and its price is higher :
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ..._Notebook_Pavilion_DV6-_-34-157-387-_-Product
edit : this is better
Kenka said:Thank you for this knowledgeable info. So overall, it's good to have Windows, Firefox and your media player installed on your SSD plus whatever ressource-consuming tool you'd use for work and, let's say, Aion ? If it is the case, then there is a 40 GB SSD which looks quite unexpensive compared to its friends. Everything should fit in there and there could be some room left for a Windows 8 upgrade.
Yes. I meant anything you install on the drive itself. My catalog files are on my C: which is now the SSD. Lightroom's ability to edit and work with the catalog is much improved, even though the RAW files it's working with are still on an HDD.Naked Snake said:What do you mean by "their install footprint"? Do you mean the LR Catalog?
RedSwirl said:Okay can someone at least give me some tips fow differentiating the pros and cons of different versions of the same GPU?
·feist· said:Seems that way. The initial run of Fusion parts are low-end compared to what's coming later this year, and, especially, what's on deck for 2012.
At the very least, you should consider upgrading whatever components may be holding you back the most.
Kenka said:Thank you for this knowledgeable info. So overall, it's good to have Windows, Firefox and your media player installed on your SSD plus whatever ressource-consuming tool you'd use for work and, let's say, Aion ? If it is the case, then there is a 40 GB SSD which looks quite unexpensive compared to its friends. Everything should fit in there and there could be some room left for a Windows 8 upgrade.
I guess we stil need some time before reaching that point. In what case I think, data transfer from one SSD to another will be common and thus, there will be no need in re-installing all the stuff on the new drive.Unknown Soldier said:My standard policy is to buy way more hard drive than you think you'll need, because one day, not only will you need it but it will become way too small sooner than you think. Of course, SSDs are incredibly expensive right now, so my dream of a 1TB SSD is a dream which will remain deferred.
Really ? In that case, well.... pff, let's just wait.cartman414 said:You might want an SSD that's a bit bigger. Speed is somewhat proportional to size.
It will, indeed. It's on par with the i5-580M. The laptop itself is not future-proof but as some would say here, real men go for desktop gamingzsswimmer said:That last one you posted, I'm not too familiar with amd cpus. I assume the phenom quad core is fairly powerful. Good price, definitely will be on my top list. Thanks for the informative posts man. In all honesty the most demanding game on my laptop now is bad company 2. Sounds like the 5650 would be fine for me.